Skip to main content
Log in

A Nonparametric Index for Determining the Numbers of Events in Clusters

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The task of discriminating between heterogeneity and complete spatial randomness (CSR) for a given point process can be divided into three subtasks: the identification of the point pattern; the determination of the sizes of clusters; and the estimation of the numbers of events in dominant clusters. Many studies have been performed regarding the first and second subtasks. However, limited work has been done on the third aspect; hence, the determination of the number of events in each dominant cluster is still an unsolved problem. In this paper, we provide a solution by constructing a new index which is defined as the ratio between the variance of the (k+1)th nearest distance and that of the kth nearest distance. Our method can be divided into two phases: the detection of point pattern and the estimation of the numbers of events in dominant clusters. These phases can be estimated by the values at which the index abruptly decreases to be less than 1. A comparative study between the existing indices and our index shows the following: (i) our index can indicate the numbers of events in dominant clusters in a relatively objective way, which is different from the K-function revealing the sizes of clustered patterns; (ii) it is a nonparametric index and is easy to implement; and (iii) it demonstrates the highest detection power for differentiating between heterogeneity and CSR. The simulations and two seismic case studies also confirmed the correctness of our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assunção R (1994) Testing spatial randomness by means of angles. Biometrics 50:531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag JE (1977) Comment on “Modelling spatial patterns” by B.D. Ripley. J R Stat Soc B 39:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag JE, Gleaves JT (1973) On the detection of spatial pattern in plant communities. Bull Internat Statist Inst 45(1):153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Byth K, Ripley BD (1980) On sampling spatial patterns by distance methods. Biometrics 36:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byth K (1982) On robust distance-based intensity estimator. Biometrics 38:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chainey S, Ratcliffe J (2005) GIS and crime mapping. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • China Seismograph Network (CSN) catalog available online at: http://www.csndmc.ac.cn. Accessed in 2010

  • Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial patterns in biological populations. Ecology 35:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox TF, Lewis T (1976) A conditional distance ratio method for analyzing spatial patterns. Biometrika 63:483–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ (1977) The detection of random heterogeneity in plant populations. Biometrics 33:390–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ (1985) A kernel method for smoothing point process data. Appl Stat 34:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ, Gates DJ, Stibbard A (1987) A nonparametric estimator for pairwise-interaction point processes. Biometrika 74:763–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas JB (1975) Clustering and aggregation. Sankhya, Ser B 37:398–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt LL (1967) Some developments in ‘distance sampling’. Biometrics 23:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu ZX, Jiang LX (1997) On large-scale spatial heterogeneties of great shallow earthquakes and plates coupling mechanism in Chinese mainland and its adjacent area. Earthq Res China 13:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Holgate P (1965) Some new tests of randomness. J Ecol 53:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins B (1954) A new method for determining the type of distribution of plant individuals. Ann Bot 18:213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Geophysics China Earthquake Administration (1989a) The annal of the catalogue of earthquakes in China (1985). Seismological Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Geophysics China Earthquake Administration (1989b) The annal of the catalogue of earthquakes in China (1986). Seismological Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Geophysics China Earthquake Administration (1991) The annal of the catalogue of earthquakes in China (1987). Seismological Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson BA (2001) Statistical methods in spatial epidemiology, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Zimmer WJ (1985) A more powerful test for dispersion using distance measurements. Ecology 6:1669–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CR (2001) A comparison of fi distance-based methods for spatial pattern analysis. J Veg Sci 12:411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd M (1967) Mean crowding. J Anim Ecol 36:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucio PS, Brito NLC (2004) Detecting randomness in spatial point patterns, a “stat-geometrical” alternative. Math Geol 36:79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng GK (1996) Discussion on intensity assessments of recent earthquakes in Ningxia. Inland Earthquake 10:330–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugglestone AM, Renshaw E (2001) Spectral tests of randomness for spatial point patters. Environ Ecol Stat 8:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei T, Zhu AX, Zhou CH, Li BL, Qin CZ (2007) Delineation of support domain of feature in the presence of noise. Comput Geosci 33:952–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1959) The use of point to plant distances in the study of the pattern of plant populations. J Ecol 47:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard JH (1971) On distance-estimator of density in randomly distributed forests. Biometrics 27:991–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prayag VR, Deshmukh SR (2000) Testing randomness of spatial pattern using Eberhardt’s index. Environmetrics 11:571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley BD (1976) The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J Appl Probab 13:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley BD (1977) Modelling spatial patterns. J R Stat Soc B 39:172–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffers K, Schurr FM, Tielborger K, Urbach C, Moloney K, Jeltsch F (2008) Dealing with virtual aggregation—a new index for analysing heterogeneous point patterns. Ecography 31:545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skellam JG (1952) Studies in statistical ecology, I: spatial pattern. Biometrika 39:346–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifkovic S, Yamamoto H (2008) Indexing of spatial patterns of trees using a mean of angles. J For Res 13:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson HR (1956) Distribution of distance to nth neighbour in a population randomly distributed individuals. Ecology 37:391–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang JC, Chang CP, Ogata Y, Chen YL (2005) A study on the background and clustering seismicity in the Taiwan region by using point process models. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 110:B05S18. doi:10.1029/2004JB003157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Pei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pei, T. A Nonparametric Index for Determining the Numbers of Events in Clusters. Math Geosci 43, 345–362 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9325-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9325-x

Keywords

Navigation