Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Segmentation of Geophysical Log Data

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stationary segments in well log sequences can be automatically detected by searching for change points in the data. These change points, which correspond to abrupt changes in the statistical nature of the underlying process, can be identified by analysing the probability density functions of two adjacent sub-samples as they move along the data sequence. A statistical test is used to set a significance level of the probability that the two distributions are the same, thus providing a means to decide how many segments comprise the data by keeping those change points that yield low probabilities. Data from the Ocean Drilling Program were analysed, where a high correlation between the available core-log lithology interpretation and the statistical segmentation was observed. Results show that the proposed algorithm can be used as an auxiliary tool in the analysis and interpretation of geophysical log data for the identification of lithology units and sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davis J (1986) Statistics and data analysis in geology. Wiley, New York, p 646

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill D (1970) Application of a statistical zonation method to reservoir evaluation and digitized-log analysis. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 54(5):719–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill D, Shomrony A, Fligelman H (1993) Numerical zonation of log suites and logfacies recognition by multivariate clustering. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 77(10):1781–1791

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins DM, Merriam DF (1973) Optimal zonation of digitized sequential data. Math Geol 5(4):389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaaresen KF, Taxt T (1998) Multichannel blind deconvolution of seismic signals. Geophysics 63(6):2093–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligges U, Weihs C, Hasse-Becker P (2002) Detection of locally stationary segments in time series. In: Härdle W, Rönz B (eds) Proc. of the 15th conference on computational statistics. Physika, Heidelberg, pp 285–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, Flannery B (1992) Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarduno JA, Duncan RA, Scholl DW (2002) Motion of the Hawaiian hotspot: a paleomagnetic test. In: Proc. ODP, initial reports, vol 197, available from Word Wide Web: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/197_IR

  • Velis DR (2003) Estimating the distribution of primary reflection coefficients. Geophysics 68(4):1417–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R (1973) Automatic soil-boundary location from transect data. Math Geol 5(1):27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz Ö (2001) Seismic data analysis: processing, inversion, and interpretation of seismic data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilo R. Velis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velis, D.R. Statistical Segmentation of Geophysical Log Data. Math Geol 39, 409–417 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9103-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9103-y

Keywords

Navigation