Skip to main content
Log in

The Necessity of a Multiple-Point Prior Model

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Any interpolation, any hand contouring or digital drawing of a map or a numerical model necessarily calls for a prior model of the multiple-point statistics that link together the data to the unsampled nodes, then these unsampled nodes together. That prior model can be implicit, poorly defined as in hand contouring; it can be explicit through an algorithm as in digital mapping. The multiple-point statistics involved go well beyond single-point histogram and two-point covariance models; the challenge is to define algorithms that can control more of such statistics, particularly those that impact most the utilization of the resulting maps beyond their visual appearance. The newly introduced multiple-point simulation (mps) algorithms borrow the high order statistics from a visually and statistically explicit model, a training image. It is shown that mps can simulate realizations with high entropy character as well as traditional Gaussian-based algorithms, while offering the flexibility of considering alternative training images with various levels of low entropy (organized) structures. The impact on flow performance (spatial connectivity) of choosing a wrong training image among many sharing the same histogram and variogram is demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arpat, B., and Caers, J., 2005, A multiple scale, pattern-based approach to sequential simulation, in Leuangthong, O., and Deutsch, C. V., eds., Proc. of the 2004 Banff Int. Geostat. Congress: Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, p. 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caers, J., and Zhang, T., 2004, Multiple-point geostatistics: a quantitative vehicle for integrating geologic analogs into multiple reservoir models, in Grammer, G. M., Harris, P. M., and Eberli, G. P., eds., Integration of outcrop and modern analogs in reservoir modeling. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Memoir p. 384–394.

  3. Deutsch, C., and Journel, A. G., 1998, GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn.: Oxford University Press, New York, 368 p.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Journel, A. G., 1993, Geostatistics: Roadblocks and challenges, in Soares, A., ed., Geostat Troia 1992, vol. 1: Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, p. 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Journel, A. G., and Deutsch, C. V., 1993, Entropy and spatial disorder: Math. Geol., v. 25, no. 3,p. 329–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishnan, S., and Journel, A. G., 2003, Spatial connectivity: from variograms to multiple-point measures: Math. Geol., v. 35, no. 8, p. 915–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Strebelle, S., 2000, Sequential simulation drawing structures from training images: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, California, 193 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Strebelle, S., 2002, Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics: Math. Geol., v. 34, no. 1, p. 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, T., Switzer, P., and Journel, A. G., 2006, Filter-based classification of training image patterns for spatial simulation: Math. Geol., v. 38, no. 1 (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre Journel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Journel, A., Zhang, T. The Necessity of a Multiple-Point Prior Model. Math Geol 38, 591–610 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-006-9031-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-006-9031-2

Key Words

Navigation