Abstract
Multigaussian kriging is used in geostatistical applications to assess the recoverable reserves in ore deposits, or the probability for a contaminant to exceed a critical threshold. However, in general, the estimates have to be calculated by a numerical integration (Monte Carlo approach). In this paper, we propose analytical expressions to compute the multigaussian kriging estimator and its estimation variance, thanks to polynomial expansions. Three extensions are then considered, which are essential for mining and environmental applications: accounting for an unknown and locally varying mean (local stationarity), accounting for a block-support correction, and estimating spatial averages. All these extensions can be combined; they generalize several known techniques like ordinary lognormal kriging and uniform conditioning by a Gaussian value. An application of the concepts to a porphyry copper deposit shows that the proposed “ordinary multigaussian kriging” approach leads to more realistic estimates of the recoverable reserves than the conventional methods (disjunctive and simple multigaussian krigings), in particular in the nonmineralized undersampled areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, R. J., and Johnson, T. B., 1984, Positive kriging, in Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A. G., and Maréchal, A., eds., Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 231–244.
Chilès, J. P., and Delfiner, P., 1999, Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty: Wiley, New York, 696 p.
David, M., 1988, Handbook of applied advanced geostatistical ore reserve evaluation: Elsevier, Amsterdam, 216 p.
Goovaerts, P., 1997, Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation: Oxford University Press, New York, 480 p.
Journel, A. G., 1980, The lognormal approach to predicting local distributions of selective mining unit grades: Math. Geol., v. 12, no. 4, p. 285–303.
Journel, A. G., 1982, The indicator approach to estimation of spatial distributions, in Johnson, T. B., and Barnes, R. J., eds., Proceedings of the 17th APCOM International Symposium: Society of Mining Engineers of the AIME, New York, p. 793–806.
Matheron, G., 1974, Les fonctions de transfert des petits panneaux: Internal report N-395, Centre de Géostatistique et de Morphologie Mathématique, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Fontainebleau, 73 p.
Matheron, G., 1976, A simple substitute for conditional expectation: the disjunctive kriging, in Guarascio, M., David, M., and Huijbregts, C. J., eds., Advanced geostatistics in the mining industry: Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 221–236.
Matheron, G., 1984, The selectivity of the distributions and the “second principle” of geostatistics, in Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A. G., and Maréchal, A., eds., Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 421–433.
Remacre, A. Z., 1989, Uniform conditioning versus indicator kriging: a comparative study with the actual data, in Armstrong, M., ed., Geostatistics: Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 947–960.
Rivoirard, J., 1994, Introduction to disjunctive kriging and nonlinear geostatistics: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 181 p.
Verly, G., 1983, The multigaussian approach and its applications to the estimation of local reserves: Math. Geol., v. 15, no. 2, p. 259–286.
Verly, G., 1984, The block distribution given a point multivariate normal distribution, in Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A. G., and Maréchal, A., eds., Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 495–515.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Emery, X. Simple and Ordinary Multigaussian Kriging for Estimating Recoverable Reserves. Math Geol 37, 295–319 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-1560-6
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-1560-6