Skip to main content
Log in

Compositional Data Analysis of Some Alkaline Glasses

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The approach to the analysis of compositional data involving log-ratio transformation of the data has not been generally adopted by researchers wishing to analyse such data. In the context of exploratory methods of multivariate analysis, such as principal components analysis, where the hope is to identify (cluster) structure in the data, this may be because traditional methods can produce more interpretable results than the log-ratio approach. After illustrating this with an example, circumstances under which the log-ratio approach performs poorly when traditional approaches work well are identified. Log-ratio analysis can be dominated by variables having low absolute presence and high relative variation that do not contribute to, and can obscure, structure in the data. Traditional methods can detect certain kinds of structure in the data that correspond to structure on a ratio scale, after a suitable redefinition of the composition. Since traditional methods often detect such structure more directly than log-ratio analysis it can be concluded that claims that the traditional analysis is “inappropriate” or “meaningless” are exaggerated. This conclusion is based on empirical experience rather than theoretical concerns. The arguments are illustrated using compositional data for alkaline glasses, but have more general application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J., 1986, The statistical analysis of compositional data: Chapman and Hall, London, 416 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 2002, Simplicial inference, in Viana, M.A.G. and Richards, D.S.P., eds., Algebraic methods in statistics and probability: American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island (USA), p. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., and Greenacre, M., 2002, Biplots of compositional data: Appl. Stat., v. 51, no. 4, p. 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., Barceló-Vidal, C., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 2002, Some comments on compositional data analysis in archaeometry, in particular the fallacies in Tangri and Wright’s dismissal of logratio analysis: Archaeometry, v. 44, no. 2, p. 295–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barceló-Vidal, C., 2003, When a data set can be considered compositional? Paper presented at Compositional Data Analysis Workshop, Girona, Spain: http://ima.udg.es/Activitats/CoDaWork03/

  • Baxter, M. J., 1993, Comment on D. Tangri and R. V. S. Wright, “Multivariate analysis of compositional data ...”: Archaeometry, v. 35, no. 1, p. 112–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M. J., 2004, Distance and transformation in the multivariate analysis of archaeometric data, in Martini, M., Milazzo, M. and Piacentini, M., eds., Proceedings of the international school “Enrico Fermi” Course CLIV—Physics Methods in Archaeometry, IOS Press, Amsterdam, p. 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M. J., Cool, H. E. M., and Jackson, C. J., 2005, Further studies in the compositional variability of colorless Romano-British glass: Archaeometry, v. 47, no. 1 (in press).

  • Beardah, C. C., Baxter, M. J., Cool, H. E. M., and Jackson, C. M., 2003, Compositional data analysis of archaeological glass – problems and possible solutions: Paper presented at Compositional Data Analysis Workshop, Girona, Spain: http://ima.udg.es/Activitats/CoDaWork03/paper_baxter_Beardah2.pdf

  • Greenacre, M. J., 2002, Ratio maps and correspondence analysis: Departament d’Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Working Paper 598. http://www.econ.upf.es/cgi-bin/onepaper?598

  • Henderson, J., 2000, The science and archaeology of materials: Routledge, London, 334 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N., and Sibson, R., 1971, Mathematical taxonomy: Wiley, London, 286 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., and Bibby, J. M., 1979, Multivariate analysis: Academic Press, London, 521 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Fernández, J. A., Barceló-Vidal, C., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 2003, Dealing with zeros and missing values in compositional data sets: Math. Geol., v. 35, no. 3, p. 253–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams-Thorpe, O., 1995, Obsidian in the Mediterranean and the Near East: A provenancing success story: Archaeometry, v. 37, no. 2, p. 217–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Baxter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baxter, M.J., Beardah, C.C., Cool, H.E.M. et al. Compositional Data Analysis of Some Alkaline Glasses. Math Geol 37, 183–196 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-1308-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-1308-3

Keywords

Navigation