Skip to main content
Log in

Proud volunteers: the role of self- and vicarious-pride in promoting volunteering

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the role of self- and vicarious-pride in eliciting divergent mindsets and behaviors toward volunteering. We propose that the congruent matching of self-pride (vicarious-pride) emotions with promotion (prevention) focus-framed messages increases the effectiveness of promoting volunteering behaviors. The positive “match-up” effects arise because self-pride elicits a competitive mindset, whereas vicarious-pride elicits a collaborative mindset toward volunteering. We test our predictions across three experimental studies using behavioral measures in different non-profit organizational settings. The findings contribute to research on the role of pride in prosocial consumer behavior by providing empirical evidence that self-pride and vicarious-pride lead to different mindsets and behavioral outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As an additional analysis, we used recognition and reciprocity measures as potential mediators. The results were non-significant.

References

  • Amnesty International (2018) Gun violence. https://www.amnestyusa.org/issues/gun-violence/.

  • Barclay, P., & Van Vugt, M. (2015). The evolutionary psychology of human prosociality: adaptations, byproducts, and mistakes. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology (pp. 37–60). New York: The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N., Singh, S. N., & Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing helping behavior: an integrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing, 60, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, L. A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2015). Feeling love and doing more for distant others: specific positive emotions differentially affect prosocial consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 657–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Change.org (2018) We want road safety camera AWAS in Taman Melawati to protect the school kids. https://www.change.org/p/dear-jpj-transport-minister-we-want-road-safety-camera-under-awas-to-be-installed-in-front-of-sktm2-to-protect-the-school-kids.

  • Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Positive cueing: promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporation for National Community Service (2017) Volunteering and civic life in America. https://www.nationalservice.gov/vcla.

  • De Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, R., & Barasch, A. (2014). Prosocial behavior in intergroup relations: how donor self-construal and recipient group-membership shape generosity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorikhin, A., & Patrick, V. M. (2010). Positive mood and resistance to temptation: the interfering influence of elevated arousal. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 698–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J., & Ackerman, D. (1998). The effects of recognition and group need on volunteerism: a social norm perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 262–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace (2018) Fighting global warming. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/global-warming/.

  • Griskevicius, V., & Kenrick, D. T. (2013). Fundamental motives: how evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Shiota, M. N., & Nowlis, S. M. (2010a). The many shades of rose-colored glasses: an evolutionary approach to the influence of different positive emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 238–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010b). Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: the case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1047–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: the case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph M (2017) America does not have enough volunteers. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/marc-joseph/america-does-not-have-eno_b_9032152.html.

  • Ju, I., He, Y., Chen, Q., He, W., Shen, B., & Sar, S. (2017). The mind-set to share: an exploration of antecedents of narrowcasting versus broadcasting in digital advertising. Journal of Advertising, 46, 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiersz A (2016) Volunteering in America is at its lowest level in over a decade. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/bls-volunteering-chart-2016-2?r=US&IR=T.

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Meglino, B. M., Lester, S. W., & Jeong, S. S. (2010). Paying you back or paying me forward: understanding rewarded and unrewarded organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2012). Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing, 76, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebowitz, M. S., & Dovidio, J. F. (2015). Implications of emotion regulation strategies for empathic concern, social attitudes and helping behavior. Emotion, 15, 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. (2000). Practical meta-analysis (applied social research methods). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, K. R. (1994). Motivating recycling behavior: a quasiexperimental investigation of message and source strategies. Psychology & Marketing, 11, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShane, B. B., & Böckenholt, U. (2017). Single-paper meta-analysis: benefits for study summary, theory testing, and replicability. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 1048–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindsets shape consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J., & Hassay, D. N. (2007). A typology of charity support behaviors: toward a holistic view of helping. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 17, 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H.-W. (1990). Altruism: a review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, L. L., Coulter, R. A., Strizhakova, Y., & Schultz, A. (2018). The fresh start mindset: transforming consumers’ lives. Journal of Consumer Research, 45, 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad, G. (2013). Evolutionary consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Septianto, F., & Chiew, T. M. (2018). The effects of different, discrete positive emotions on electronic word-of-mouth. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Septianto, F., & Pratiwi, L. (2016). The moderating role of construal level on the evaluation of emotional appeal vs. cognitive appeal advertisements. Marketing Letters, 27, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L. (2015). Antecedents to psychological reactance: the impact of threat, message frame. and Choice Health Communication, 30, 975–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (2005). Competition, cooperation, and the effects of others on me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 1029–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, C., Breheny, M., & Mansvelt, J. (2015). Volunteering as reciprocity: beneficial and harmful effects of social policies to encourage contribution in older age. Journal of Aging Studies, 33, 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 114–137). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Emerging insights into the nature and function of pride. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 147–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. A., & Davies, J. (2017). Beyond the self: pride felt in relation to others. In J. A. Carter & E. C. Gordon (Eds.), The moral psychology of pride (pp. 43–68). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, K. P., & Barone, M. J. (2011). Warm glow or cold, hard cash? Social identity effects on consumer choice for donation versus discount promotions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 855–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, K. P., & Haws, K. L. (2011). Helpful hopefulness: the effect of future positive emotions on consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 505–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Aquino, K. (2013). When does recognition increase charitable behavior? Toward a moral identity-based model. Journal of Marketing, 77, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woltin, K.-A., Corneille, O., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Förster, J. (2011). Narrowing down to open up for other people’s concerns: empathic concern can be enhanced by inducing detailed processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 418–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer Jr., W. W., & Starnes, B. J. (2001). Conceptual foundations and practical guidelines for recruiting volunteers to serve in local nonprofit organizations: part I. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 9, 63–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S., & Baumgartner, H. (2009). Regulatory focus and message framing: a test of three accounts. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Septianto.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Before you continue with the next part of the survey, would you please take a few minutes to read the following request from the Change.org?

The illegal U-Turn and the failure of drivers and bikers to stop and/or REFUSE to slow down at pedestrian crossing have caused road fatalities over the years in front of many schools in Malaysia.

There was one instance when two schoolchildren (siblings) mowed down by a speeding car while using the pedestrian crossing at Jalan Taman Melawati, in front of SKTM2. One died and the other brother suffered serious injury, went into coma and later recovered. This unfortunate incident was confirmed by the family member of the deceased in Twitter. We need big help and action from JPJ and Transport Ministry to install safety cameras in front of schools.

ROAD SAFETY CAMERA COULD SAVE LIVES! (Promotion)

NO ROAD SAFETY CAMERA COULD LEAD TO DEATHS! (Prevention)

Appendix 2

Before you continue with the next part of the survey, would you please take a few minutes to read the following request from the Amnesty International?

We all want to be safe and secure, and to live without fear, and that’s a human right that we all have.

But in the USA, gun violence is an epidemic that directly threatens these rights—and Amnesty International is addressing it as the human rights crisis it is.

On a September afternoon, a gang member who was reportedly seeking revenge for a minor injury suffered in a gang-related shooting walked into a crowded park with fellow gang members, and one of them unloaded more than a dozen bullets from an assault rifle, injuring 13 people—including a three-year-old boy. One of the bullets struck the boy just behind his right ear and exited from his face. He recovered after multiple surgeries.

Amnesty International documented the boy’s story and several others in a 2014 report on the epidemic of gun violence in Chicago. The report outlined how gun violence violates the human rights of men, women, and children in communities across the nation, and it outlined a series of reforms that need to be adopted in the United States to protect people.

GUN’S OWNERSHIP CONTROL COULD PROMOTE A SAFER AMERICA! (Promotion)

NO GUN’S OWNERSHIP CONTROL COULD LEAD TO A MORE DANGEROUS AMERICA! (Prevention)

Appendix 3

figure a

Neutral, Promotion Ad

figure b

Neutral, Prevention Ad

figure c

Self-Pride, Promotion Ad

figure d

Self-Pride, Prevention Ad

figure e

Vicarious-Pride, Promotion Ad

figure f

Vicarious-Pride, Prevention Ad

Appendix 4

figure g

Contrast 1 indicates the relationship between self-pride and neutral conditions for the promotion message, whereas contrast 2 indicates the relationship between vicarious-pride and neutral conditions for the prevention message.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Septianto, F., Sung, B., Seo, Y. et al. Proud volunteers: the role of self- and vicarious-pride in promoting volunteering. Mark Lett 29, 501–519 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-018-9472-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-018-9472-7

Keywords

Navigation