Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cake or fruit? Influencing healthy food choice through the interaction of automatic and instructed mental simulation

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Promoting healthy food choice is a central issue for public welfare and a continuous challenge for marketers and policy makers. This research examines how marketing communication elements, such as visuals and text, can be used to encourage healthy food choices. Extending previous research in automatic process mental simulation, this research examines whether visual presentations of food items can trigger a different type of automatic mental simulation that is outcome oriented. Results from four studies show that visual presentations of food items in an advertisement can trigger process and outcome automatic mental simulation (AMS) of food consumption, and AMS interacts with an advertisement’s instructed mental simulation (IMS) to influence consumer healthy food choice. Contributing to marketing research in using IMS in advertising to promote product offerings, this research demonstrates that the success of IMS cues varies depending not only on the amount, but more importantly, the type of AMS triggered from visual cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aydinoğlu, N. Z., & Krishna, A. (2012). Imagining thin: why vanity sizing works. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 565–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S., & Holt, L. (2007). Embodied preference judgments can likeability be driven by the motor system?. Psychological Science, 18(1), 51–57.

  • Burton, S., Howlett, E., & Tangari, H. (2009). Food for thought: how will the nutrition labeling of quick service restaurant menu items influence consumers’ product evaluations, purchase intentions, and choices? Journal of Retailing, 85(3), 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2007). The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eelen, J., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2013). Situated embodied cognition: monitoring orientation cues affects product evaluation and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 424–433.

  • Elder, R., & Krishna, A. (2012). The “visual depiction effect” in advertising: facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J., & Luce, M. (2003). Process versus outcome thought focus and advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J., & Luce, M. (2004). Understanding the effects of process-focused versus outcome-focused thought in response to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 274–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J., & Stern, B. (2003). Sympathy and empathy: emotional responses to advertising dramas. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 566–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

  • Hoeffler, S. (2003). Measuring preferences for really new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 406–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, N., Petrova, P., & Cialdini, R. (2006). Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minton, E., & Cornwell T B (2015) The cause cue effect: cause-related marketing and consumer health perceptions. Journal of Consumer Affairs.

  • Miyazaki, A., Grewal, D., & Goodstein, R. (2005). The effect of multiple extrinsic cues on quality perceptions: A matter of consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 146–153.

  • Ogden, C., Carrol, M., Kit, B., & Flegal, K. (2014). Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311(8), 806–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, L., & Taylor, S. (1999). From thought to action: effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R., Dhillon, S., & Beilock, S. (2009). Reach for what you like: The body’s role in shaping preferences. Emotion Review, 1(2), 140–150.

  • Raghunathan, R., Naylor, R., & Hoyer, W. (2006). The unhealthy equal tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 170–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2004). Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. (2002). The availability heuristic revisited: ease of recall and content of recall as distinct sources of information. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, H., & Sengupta, J. (2012). If you can’t grab it, it won't grab you: The effect of restricting the dominant hand on target evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 525–529.

  • Simmons, K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. (2005). Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. Cerebral Cortex, 15(10), 1602–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Schneider, S. (1989). Coping and the simulation of events. Social Cognition, 7(2), 174–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Pham, L., Rivkin, I., & Armor, D. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. American Psychologist, 53(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D., Hamilton, R., & Petrova, P. (2009). When mental simulation hinders behavior: the effects of process-oriented thinking on decision difficulty and performance. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 562–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Kemps, E. (2005). The phenomenology of food cravings: the role of mental imagery. Appetite, 45(3), 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830.

  • Wansink B (1996) Can package size accelerate usage volume? The Journal of Marketing, 1–14.

  • Wansink, B., & Chandon, P. (2006). Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 605–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, B., Payne, C., & Shimizu, M. (2011). The 100-calorie semi-solution: sub-packaging most reduces intake among the heaviest. Obesity, 19(5), 1098–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oregon, 1208 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA

    Hu Xie & Lynn R. Kahle

  2. University of Wyoming, 1000 E University Ave, Laramie, WY, 82071, USA

    Elizabeth A. Minton

Authors
  1. Hu Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth A. Minton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lynn R. Kahle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hu Xie.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Key measures

figure a

Appendix 2: Study 3 stimuli

1.1 Process IMS condition

figure b

1.2 Outcome IMS condition

figure c

Appendix 3: Study 4 stimuli

1.1 Cake and process IMS condition: ad banner design and demo

figure d

1.2 Salad and outcome IMS condition: ad banner design and demo

figure e

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, H., Minton, E.A. & Kahle, L.R. Cake or fruit? Influencing healthy food choice through the interaction of automatic and instructed mental simulation. Mark Lett 27, 627–644 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-016-9412-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-016-9412-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation