Skip to main content
Log in

Do I know you? How brand familiarity and perceived fit affect consumers’ attitudes towards brands placed in movies

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study uses Associative Network Theory to construct a model that explains effects of brand placement in movies. Based on a field experiment (n = 167), we investigate the effects of plot connection and prominence on brand attitude, as well as the mediating role of brand-movie fit and the moderating role of brand familiarity. Results show that more closely connecting a brand to the plot of a movie positively impacts brand attitude by increasing the perceived fit between the brand and the movie. Brand familiarity moderates the effect of the interaction between a placement’s plot connection and prominence on brand attitude. When brand familiarity is high, there is no significant effect of plot connection on brand attitude, nor is this effect moderated by the prominence of the placement. However, when brand familiarity is low, both prominently and subtly connecting the brand to the plot of the movie positively influences brand attitude. More importantly, the effect of plot connection is significantly stronger when an unfamiliar brand is prominently placed, than when it is subtly placed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balasubramanian, S. K., Karrh, J. A., & Patwardhan, H. (2006). Audience response to product placements: an integrative framework and future research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, E., & Barron, C. (2008). When product placement goes wrong: the effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J., Romer, D., & McQueen, J. (1989). Using drama to persuade. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dens, N., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2010). Advertising for extensions: moderating effects of extension type, advertising strategy, and product category involvement on extension evaluation. Marketing Letters, 21(2), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., Wouters, M., & Purnawirawan, N. (2012). Do you like what you recognize? The effects of brand placement prominence and movie plot connection on brand attitude as mediated by recognition. Journal of Advertising, 41(3), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, R., & Avery, R. J. (2000). Brand appearances on prime-time television. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 22(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, B., & Roediger, H. L. I. (2013). Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1665–1681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2008) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press

  • Homer, P. M. (2009). Product placements: the impact of placement type and repetition on attitude. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens W, De Pelsmacker P, Wijnen K, Van Kenhove P (2008) Marketing research with SPSS. Prentice Hall

  • La Ferle, C., & Edwards, S. M. (2006). Product placement: how brands appear on television. Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehu, J.-M., & Bressoud, E. (2008). Effectiveness of brand placement: new insights about viewers. Journal of Business Research, 61(10), 1083–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, W. D., Jr., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. A. (2002). Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: the role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 306–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. A., & Stern, B. B. (2006). Consumers, characters, and products: a balance model of sitcom product placement effects. Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Neijens, P., & Smit, E. (2007). Effects of Television brand placement on brand image. Psychology and Marketing, 24(5), 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. H. (1979). Consumer initial processing in a difficult media environment. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(3), 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Flemish Agency for Innovation Through Science and Technology (IWT Vlaanderen).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yann Verhellen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verhellen, Y., Dens, N. & De Pelsmacker, P. Do I know you? How brand familiarity and perceived fit affect consumers’ attitudes towards brands placed in movies. Mark Lett 27, 461–471 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9347-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9347-0

Keywords

Navigation