Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Firm's Management of Social Interactions

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumer choice is influenced in a direct and meaningful way by the actions taken by others. These “actions” range from face-to-face recommendations from a friend to the passive observation of what a stranger is wearing. We refer to the set of such contexts as “social interactions” (SI). We believe that at least some of the SI effects are partially within the firm's control and that this represents an exciting research opportunity. We present an agenda that identifies a list of unanswered questions of potential interest to both researchers and managers.

In order to appreciate the firm's choices with respect to its management of SI, it is important to first evaluate where we are in terms of understanding the phenomena themselves. We highlight five questions in this regard: (1) What are the antecedents of word of mouth (WOM)? (2) How does the transmission of positive WOM differ from that of negative WOM? (3) How does online WOM differ from offline WOM? (4) What is the impact of WOM? (5) How can we measure WOM? Finally, we identify and discuss four principal, non-mutually exclusive, roles that the firm might play: (1) observer, (2) moderator, (3) mediator, and (4) participant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. W. (1998). “Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth,” Journal of Service Research 1(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. (1992). “A Simple Model of Herd Behavior,” Journal of Economics 110(Quarterly), 797–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F. (1969). “A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables,” Management Science 15, 215–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. and S. Song. (2004). “Social Contagion and Trial on the Internet: Evidence from Online Grocery Retailing,” Wharton Working Paper.

  • Biyalogorsky, E., E. Gerstner, and B. Libai (2001). “Customer Referral Management: Optimal Reward Programs,” Marketing Science 20, 82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani, S. D., D. Hirshleifer, and I. Welch. (1991). “A Theory of Fads, Fashions, Custom and Cultural Change as Information Cascades,” Journal of Political Economy 100, 992–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. and S. Durlauf. (2001). “Discrete Choice with Social Interactions,” Review of Economic Studies 68(2), 235–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. and J. Xie. (2004). “Online Consumer Review: A New Element of Marketing Communications Mix,” University of Arizona Working Paper.

  • Chen, Y. and J. Xie. (2005). “Third-Party Product Review and Firm Marketing Strategy,” Marketing Science 24 (2), 218–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. and M. Shi. (2004). “The Design and Implications of Customer Recommendation Programs,” NYU Working Paper.

  • Celen, B. and S. Kariv. (2003). “Distinguishing Information Cascades from Herd Behavior in the Laboratory,” American Economic Review, June 2004, 94(3), 484–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. and D. Mayzlin. (2004). “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” Yale SOM Working Paper.

  • Coleman, J. E., Katz, and E. Menzel, H. (1957). “The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians,” Sociometry December, 253–270.

  • Das, S., A. Martínez-Jerez and P. Tufano. (2005). “eInformation: A Clinical Study of Investor Discussion and Sentiment,” Financial Management (forthcoming).

  • Das, S. and M. Chen. (2004). “Yahoo! for Amazon: Sentiment Extraction from Small Talk on the Web,” Santa Clara University Working Paper.

  • Dellarocas, C. (2004). “Strategic Manipulation of Internet Opinion Forums: Implications for Consumers and Firms”, MIT Working Paper.

  • Dellarocas, C., N. Awad and X. Zhang. (2004). “Exploring the Value of Online Reviews to Organizations: Implications for Revenue Forecasting and Planning”, MIT Working Paper.

  • Feick, F. and L. Price. (1987). “The Market Maven: A Diffuser of Marketplace Information,” Journal of Marketing 51, 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A. and M. Rosenzweig. (1995). “Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture,” Journal of Political Economy 103(6), 1176–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, T., J. Goldenberg, B. Libai and E. Muller. (2004). “From Density to Destiny: Using Spatial Analysis for Early Prediction of New Product Success,” Marketing Science 22(3), 419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy, U, M. Niederle and A. Rustichini. (2003), “Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences,” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVIII, (August) 1049–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godes, D. and D. Mayzlin. (2004). “Using Online Conversations to Measure Word of Mouth Communication,” Marketing Science 23(4), 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godes, D. and D. Mayzlin. (2004). “Firm-Created Word of Mouth Communication: A Quasi-Experiment,” Harvard Business School Working Paper.

  • Goldenberg, J., B. Libai and E. Muller. (2004). “The Chilling Effect of Network Externalities on New Product Growth,” Tel-Aviv University Working Paper.

  • Gladwell, M. (2000). The Tipping Point. New York, NY: Little, Brown

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. (1999). “Basic Facts on Customer Complaint Behavior and the Impact of Service on the Bottom Line,” http://www.e-satisfy.com/pdf/basicfacts.pdf.

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. B., S. MacKenzie, and P. Podsakoff. (2003). “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model izsspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research 30(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. and W. Hoyer. (1981). “What if Opinion Leaders Didn't Know More? A Question of Nomological Validity,” In Kent B. Monroe, (ed.) Advances in Consumer Research Vol. 8. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.34)

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. and P. Lazarsfeld. (1955). Personal Influence. Glencoe (IL): Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2002). “The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities,” Journal of Marketing Research 39, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, J., R. Lewis, L. Mobilio, D. Perry and N. Raman. (2004). “Viral Marketing or Electronic Word-of-Mouth Advertising: Examining Consumer Responses and Motivations to Pass Along Email,” Journal of Advertising Research 44(4), 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putsis, W., S. Balasubramanian, E. Kaplan, and S. Sen. (1997). “Mixing Behavior in Cross-Country Diffusion,” Marketing Science 16, 354–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayzlin, D. (2004). “Promotional Chat on the Internet,” Marketing Science (Forthcoming).

  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Ed., New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, E. (2000). The Anatomy of Buzz. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulte, C. and G. Lilien. (2001). “Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort,” American Journal of Sociology 106(5), 1409–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. W. J. Verlegh, K. A. Peters, and A. Th. H. Pruyn. (2003). “Turning Shoppers into Sellers: Two Experimental Studies on Member-get-Member Campaigns.” Advances in Consumer Research 30, 364–365

    Google Scholar 

  • P. W. J. Verlegh, C. Verkerk, M. A. Tuk and A. Smidts. (2004). “Customers or Sellers? The Role of Persuasion Knowledge in Customer Referral,” Advances in Consumer Research 31, 304–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1994). “On the Function of Sales Assistance,” Marketing Science 13, 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojnicki, A. and D. Godes. (2004). “Word of Mouth as Impression Management,” HBS Working Paper.

  • Yin, Chien-Chung. (1998). “Equilibria of Collective Action in Different Distributions of Protest Thresholds,” Public Choice 97, 535–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y. et al. The Firm's Management of Social Interactions. Market Lett 16, 415–428 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-5902-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-5902-4

Keywords

Navigation