Skip to main content
Log in

Models of Multi-Category Choice Behavior

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the advent of basket-level purchasing data of households, choice modelers are actively engaged in the development of statistical and econometric models of multi-category choice behavior of households. This paper reviews current developments in this area of research, discussing the modeling methodologies that have been used, the empirical findings that have emerged so far, and directions for future research. We also motivate the use of Bayesian methods to overcome the computational challenges involved in estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainslie, A. and P. E. Rossi. (1998). “Similarities in Choice Behavior Across Multiple Categories,” Marketing Science 17(2), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainslie, A., G. Sonnier, and S. Moorthy. (2004). “Taming the Intercept Term in Choice Models: An Application to Private Labels,” Working Paper, University of California at Los Angeles.

  • Albert, J. and S. Chib. (1993). “Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. R. and J. M. Lattin. (1998). “Shopping Behavior and Consumer Preferences for Store Price Format: Why Large Basket Shoppers Prefer EDLP,” Marketing Science 17(1), 66–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. R., T. Ho, and C. S. Tang. (1998). “Determining Where to Shop: Fixed and Variable Costs of Shopping,” Journal of Marketing Research 35(3), 352–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C. R., S. Srinivasan, and K. W. Axhausen. (2004). “An Analysis of Multiple Interactivity Durations Using a Unifying Multivariate Hazard Model,” Working Paper, The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Bodapati, A. V. and V. Srinivasan. (2001). “The Impact of Out-of-Store Advertising on Store Sales, “Working Paper,” University of California at Los Angeles.

  • Boatwright, P., S. Borle, and J. B. Kadane. (2003). “A Model of the Joint Distribution of Purchase Quantity and Timing,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 98, 564–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borle, S., P. Boatwright, J. B. Kadane, J. C. Nunes, and G. Shmueli. (2004). “Effect of Product Assortment Changes on Customer Retention,” Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.

  • Chiang, J. (1991). “A Simultaneous Approach to the Whether, What and How Much to Buy Questions,” Marketing Science 10(4), 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T., Y. Ma, C. Narasimhan, and V. Singh. (2005). “A Store Choice Model with Basket Shopping,” Working Paper, Washington University in St. Louis.

  • Chib, S. and E. Greenberg. (1995). “Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm,” The American Statistician 49(4), 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S. and E. Greenberg. (1998). “Analysis of Multivariate Probit Models,” Biometrika 85(2), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S., P. B. Seetharaman, and A. Strijnev. (2002). “Analysis of Multi-Category Purchase Incidence Decisions Using IRI Market Basket Data,” Advances in Econometrics 16, 55–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S., P. B. Seetharaman, and A. Strijnev. (2004). “Model of Brand Choice With a No-Purchase Option Calibrated to Scanner-Panel Data,” Journal of Marketing Research 41(2), 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S., P. B. Seetharaman, and A. Strijnev. (2005). “Joint Modeling of Multiple Category Incidence and Private Label Choice, Accounting for No Category Incidence and Panel Heterogeneity,” Working Paper, School of Management, University at Buffalo.

  • Chintagunta, P. K. and S. Haldar. (1998). “Investigating Purchase Timing Behavior in Two Related Product Categories,” Journal of Marketing Research 35(1), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. and V. R. Rao. (2003). “A General Choice Model for Bundles with Multiple-Category Products: Application to Market Segmentation and Optimal Pricing for Bundles,” Journal of Marketing Research 40(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972). “The Analysis of Multivariate Binary Data, Applied Statistics,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 21(2), 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepak, S., A. Ansari, and S. Gupta. (2002). “Investigating Consumer Price Sensitivities Across Categories,” Working Paper, University of Iowa.

  • Dhar, R. and I. Simonson. (1999). “Making Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes: Highlighting Versus Balancing,” Journal of Marketing Research 36(1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, T., G. J. Russell, A. D. Shocker, R. L. Andrews, L. Bacon, B. L. Bayus, J. D. Carroll, R. M. Johnson, W. A. Kamakura, P. Lenk, J. A. Mazanec, V. R. Rao, and V. Shankar. (2002). “Inferring Market Structure from Customer Response to Competing and Complementary Products,” Marketing Letters 13(3) 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T. (1998). “An Empirical Analysis of Umbrella Branding,” Journal of Marketing Research 35(3), 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T. and B. Sun. (2002). “An Empirical Investigation of the Spillover Effects of Advertising and Sales Promotions in Umbrella Branding,” Journal of Marketing Research 39, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T. and R. Winer. (1999). “Econometric Modeling of Competition: A Multicategory Choice-Based Mapping Approach,” Journal of Econometrics 89, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. M., P. E. Green, and Y. Wind. (1984). “Conjoint Analysis of Price Premiums for Hotel Amenities,” Journal of Business 54(1), 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E. and M. T. Devita. (1974). “A Complementarity Model of Consumer Utility for Item Collections,” Journal of Consumer Research 1(4), 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., Y. Wind, and A. K. Jain. (1972). “Preference Measurement of Item Collections,” Journal of Marketing Research 9(4), 371–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K., V. Singh, and P. K. Chintagunta. (2003). “Understanding Store Brand Purchase Behavior Across Categories,” Working Paper, Northwestern University.

  • Ho, T., C. S. Tang, and D. R. Bell. (1998). “Rational Shopping Behavior and the Option Value of Variable Pricing,” Management Science 44(12), 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard, P. (2000). Analysis of Multivariate Survival Data. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, R., A. Ansari, and S. Gupta. (2003). “Leveraging Information Across Categories,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics 1(4), 425–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedidi, K., S. Jagpal, and P. Manchanda. (2003). “Measuring Heterogeneous Reservation Prices for Product Bundles,” Marketing Science. 22(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, W. A., S. Ramaswami, and R. K. Srivastava. (1991). “Qualification of Prospects for Cross-Selling in the Financial Services Industry,” International Journal of Research in Marketing 26(4), 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B. D., K. Srinivasan, and R. T. Wilcox. (1999). “Identifying Price Sensitive Consumers: The Relative Merits of Demographic versus Purchase Pattern Information,” Journal of Retailing 75(2), 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., P. B. Seetharaman, and C. Narasimhan. (2005). “Empirical Analysis of Competitive Pricing Strategies with Complementary Product Lines,” Working Paper, Washington University in St. Louis.

  • Ma, Y. and P. B. Seetharaman. (2004a). “The Multivariate Logit Model for Multicategory Purchase Incidence Outcomes,” Working Paper, Rice University.

  • Ma, Y. and P. B. Seetharaman. (2004b). “Multivariate Hazard Models for Multicategory Purchase Timing Behavior,” Working Paper, Rice University.

  • Manchanda, P., A. Ansari, and S. Gupta. (1999). “The Shopping Basket: A Model for Multicategory Purchase Incidence Decisions,” Marketing Science 18(2), 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, N. (2005). “Investigating Consumers' Purchase Incidence and Brand Choice Decisions Across Multiple Product Categories,” Working Paper, University of Toronto.

  • Niraj, R., V. Padmanabhan, and P. B. Seetharaman (2002). “A Cross-Category Model of Households' Incidence and Quantity Decisions,” Working paper, University of Southern California.

  • Pipper, C. B. and T. Martinussen. (2004). “An Estimating Equation for Parametric Shared Frailty Models with Marginal Additive Hazards,” Working Paper, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. R. (2004). “Bundles of Multi-Attributed Items: Modeling Perceptions, Preferences and Choices,” Working Paper, Cornell University.

  • Russell, G. J. and W. A. Kamakura. (1997). “Modeling Multiple Category Brand Preference with Household Basket Data,” Journal of Retailing 73(1), 439–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. J. and A. Peterson. (2000). “Analysis of Cross Category Dependence in Market Basket Selection,” Journal of Retailing 76(3), 367–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. J., D. R. Bell, A. Bodapati, C. Brown, J. W. Chiang, G. Gaeth, S. Gupta, and P. Manchanda. (1997). “Perspectives on Multiple Category Choice,” Marketing Letters 8(3), 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. J., S. Ratneshwar, A. D. Shocker, D. R. Bell, A. Bodapati, A. Degeratu, L. Hildebrandt, N. Kim, S. Ramaswami, and V. Shankar. (1999). “Multiple Category Decision Making: Review and Synthesis,” Marketing Letters 10(3), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seetharaman, P. B. (2004). “The Additive Risk Model for Purchase Timing,” Marketing Science 23(2), 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seetharaman, P. B., A. Ainslie, and P. K. Chintagunta (1999). “Investigating Household State Dependence Effects Across Categories,” Journal of Marketing Research 36(4), 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P., K. Hansen, and S. Gupta. (2005). “Modeling Preferences For Common Attributes in Multicategory Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research 42(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, I. and P. K. Chintagunta. (2001). “Investigating Cross-Category Effects of Retailer's Marketing Activities: Application of Random Coefficient Choice Models with Aggregate Data,” Working Paper, University of Chicago.

  • Song, I. and P. K. Chintagunta. (2004). “A Discrete/Continuous Model for Multi-Category Behavior of Households,” Working Paper, University of Chicago.

  • Sudhir, K. (2001). “Structural Analysis of Manufacturer Pricing in the Presence of a Strategic Retailer,” Marketing Science 20(3), 244–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, G. J. (2000). “Duration Models: Specification, Identification, and Multiple Durations,” Working Paper, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Villas-Boas, J. M. and Y. Zhao. (2005). “Retailers, Manufacturers, andIndividual Consumers: Modeling the Supply Side in the Ketchup Marketplace,” Journal of Marketing Research 42(1), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. G. (1991). “Assessing the Impact of Retail Price Promotions on Product Substitution, Complementary Purchase and Inter-store Displacement,” Journal of Marketing 55(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. G. and S. B. MacKenzie. (1988). “A Structural Equation Model of the Impact of Price Promotions on Store Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research 25(4), 551–563.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. B. Seetharaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seetharaman, P.B., Chib, S., Ainslie, A. et al. Models of Multi-Category Choice Behavior. Market Lett 16, 239–254 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-5888-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-5888-y

Keywords

Navigation