Skip to main content
Log in

Do political connections affect bank leverage? Evidence from some Middle Eastern and North African countries

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the association between political patronage and bank financing decisions in a sample of 34 commercial banks operating in the Middle East and North Africa for the period 2003–2014. We collected information manually about the profiles and biographies of individuals on the boards of banks to identify which banks had political connections, which is the novel contribution of the study. Linear and nonlinear panel data analysis was used to investigate this relationship. The results reveal that politically backed banks tend to be more leveraged. The indirect effect of political patronage on leverage was not found to be large, but was significant through its interaction with profitability; that is, politically backed banks with higher profitability are positively associated with leverage. Our findings imply that the privileges resulting from political ties make banks more profitable, and that this also leads to higher leverage. In line with the related literature, we found that a strong political presence on the boards of banks can be considered an important intangible asset, and one of the factors driving bank financing decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baltagi, B. H., & Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR (1) disturbances. Econometric Theory,15(6), 814–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencheikh, F., & Boulila Taktak, N. (2017). The effect of political connections on the firm performance in a newly democratized country. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,4(8), 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, A., Franzini, L., & Narendranathan, W. (1982). Serial correlation and the fixed effects model. The Review of Economic Studies,49(4), 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, M. A., & Gul, F. A. (2012). Political connection and leverage: Some Malaysian evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance,36(8), 2344–2350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Guedhami, O. (2005). Economic reforms, corporate governance and privatization: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Corporate Finance,11, 767–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., & Saffar, W. (2012). Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance,18, 541–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubekeur, A. (2013). Rolling either way? Algerian entrepreneurs as both agents of change and means of preservation of the system. The Journal of North African Studies,18(3), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2013.775870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, M., & Raddatz, C. (2010). Banking on politics: When former high-ranking politicians become bank directors. The World Bank Economic Review,24(2), 234–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carretta, A., Farina, V., Gon, A., & Parisi, A. (2012). Politicians on board: Do political connections affect banking activities in Italy? European Management Review,9(2), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, P., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics,51(1–2), 58–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. J. P., Li, Z., Su, X., & Sun, Z. (2011). Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance,17, 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Feijen, L., & Schmukler, L. (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics,88(3), 554–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disli, M., Schoors, K., & Meir, J. (2013). Political connections and depositor discipline. Journal of Financial Stability,9(4), 804–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diwan, I., & Schiffbauer, M. (2018). Private banking and crony capitalism in Egypt. Business and Politics,20(3), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2018.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Liu, Z., Shen, Z., & Sun, Q. (2014). Political patronage and capital structure in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,50(3), 102–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, M. S., Girma, S., Shah, M. E., & Williams, J. (2014). Dynamic capital structure and political patronage: The case of Malaysia. International Review of Financial Analysis,31, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review,96(1), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and non-connected firms: A cross country analysis. Journal of Financial Management,39(3), 905–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics,84(2), 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review,91(4), 1095–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management,38(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. R., Zhang, H., & Derashid, C. (2006). Capital structure and political patronage: The case of Malaysia. Journal of Banking & Finance,30(4), 1291–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, T. M., & Iwasaki, I. (2011). Government directors and business-state relations in Russia. European Journal of Political Economy,27(4), 642–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, E. T., & Jomo, K. S. (1997). Malaysia’s political economy: Politics, patronage and profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specifications tests in econometrics. Econometrica,46(6), 1251–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics,67(2), 351–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favour politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics,120(4), 1371–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics,81(2), 411–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics,87, 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, T. C., Chai, R., Zhao, D., & Lim, X. Y. (2012). Capital structure and political patronage: Evidence from China. American Journal of Business and Management,1(4), 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Liu, Q., Tian, G., & Wang, P. (2018). Government connections and the persistence of profitability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Emerging Markets Review,36, 110–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micco, A., Panizza, U., & Yañez, M. (2007). Bank ownership and performance: Does politics matter? Journal of Banking & Finance,31(1), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nheri, O. (2014). Economic reforms, corporate governance and privatization method as determinants in performance changes of new privatized firms: The case of MENA countries. Journal of Management and Governance,18(1), 95–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nys, E., Tarazi, A., & Trinugroho, I. (2015). Political connections, bank deposits, and formal deposit insurance. Journal of Financial Stability,19, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omran, M., & Fatheldin, A. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance in Arab equity markets: Does ownership concentration matter? International Review of Law and Economics,28(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organisations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piesse, J., Strange, R., & Toonsi, F. (2012). Is there a distinctive MENA model of corporate governance? Journal of Management and Governance,16(4), 645–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijkers, B., Freund, C., & Nucifora, A. (2017). All in the family: State capture in Tunisia. Journal of Development Economics,124, 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1994). Politicians and firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics,109(4), 995–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Yao, C., & Kang, D. (2018). Political connections and firm performance: Evidence from government officials’ site visits. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). The resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian de Peretti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Braham, R., de Peretti, C. & Belkacem, L. Do political connections affect bank leverage? Evidence from some Middle Eastern and North African countries. J Manag Gov 23, 989–1006 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09478-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09478-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation