Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated reporting in action: mobilizing intellectual capital to improve management and governance practices

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In management studies, the relevance of intellectual capital (IC) in value creation processes has been a research topic for many years. Several attempts have been made to develop measurement and reporting systems for this relevant source of value, but managerial literature has highlighted the limits and difficulties of some of those endeavors. Integrated reporting, the general purpose of which is to provide transparent and integrated disclosure, has also entered this field with the aim of improving disclosure of intangibles, along with a strategic perspective on communication. An accurate description of a company’s IC is indeed one of the focal elements of an integrated report. This paper describes an exploratory study based on the case study research method of three companies, all of which have applied the integrated reporting IIRC framework and are operating in different business contexts. Following a performative approach, the first aim of this work is to verify the ability of integrated reporting to support the mobilization of IC and to encourage companies to take advantage of this process. This should lead to positive effects on management and governance practices, with respect to both external and internal users. Additionally, from a critical and performative perspective, this research investigates how business context influences the processes of measurement, management, and reporting of IC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeysekera, I. (2006). The project of intellectual capital disclosure: Researching the research. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(1), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abeysekera, I. (2013). A template for integrated reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, C., & Redigolo, G. (2016). Business model in IPO prospectuses: Insights from Italian Innovation Companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(2), 261–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bañegil Palacios, T. M., & Sanguino Galván, R. (2007). Intangible measurement guidelines: A comparative study in Europe. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(2), 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bini, L., Dainelli, F., & Giunta, F. (2017). Is a loosely specified regulatory intervention effective in disciplining management commentary? The case of performance indicator disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 21(1), 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boedker, C. (2010). Ostensive versus performative approaches for theorising accounting-strategy research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(5), 595–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozzolan, S., Favotto, F., & Ricceri, F. (2003). Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 543–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukh, P. N. (2003). The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: A paradox? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(1), 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman, R., & Roos, G. (2007). The importance of intellectual capital reporting: Evidence and implications. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 7–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busco, C., Frigo, M. L., Quattrone, P., & Riccaboni, A. (2014). Leading practices in integrated reporting: Management accountants will guide their companies on the journey to value creation. Strategic Finance, 12(9), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catasús, B., Ersson, S., Gröjer, J., & Yang Wallentin, F. (2007). What gets measured gets … on indicating, mobilizing and acting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(4), 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catasús, B., & Gröjer, J. (2006). Indicators: On visualizing, classifying and dramatizing. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Goh, P., & Pheng Lim, K. (2004). Disclosing intellectual capital in company annual reports: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), 500–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M., Green, W., Conradie, P., & Romi, A. (2014). The international integrated reporting framework: Key issues and future research opportunities. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 25(1), 90–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiucchi, M. S. (2013a). Measuring and reporting intellectual capital: Lessons learnt from some interventionist research projects. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(3), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiucchi, M. S. (2013b). Intellectual capital accounting in action: Enhancing learning through interventionist research. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 48–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiucchi, M. S., & Montemari, M. (2016). Investigating the “fate” of intellectual capital indicators: A case study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choong, K. K. (2008). Intellectual capital: Definitions, categorization and reporting models. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 609–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinquini, L., Passetti, E., Tenucci, A., & Frey, M. (2012). Analyzing intellectual capital information in sustainability reports: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), 531–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daum, J. H. (2003). Intangible assets and value creation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, C., & Sharma, U. (2017). A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.05.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, C., Venter, E. R., & Hsiao, P.-C. K. (2016). Integrated reporting: Background, measurement issues, approaches and an agenda for future research. Accounting & Finance, 57(4), 937–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J. (2009). Intellectual capital measurement: A critical approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), 190–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40(3), 166–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & La Torre, M. (2017). Barriers to implementing the international integrated reporting framework: A contemporary academic perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 461–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., & Cai, L. (2014). A review and critique of content analysis as a methodology for inquiring into IC disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(2), 264–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., & Dai, T. (2017). Integrated thinking as a cultural control? Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 574–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., & Garanina, T. (2013). Intellectual capital research: A critical examination of the third stage. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., & Rooney, J. (2011). “Measuring for managing?” An IC practice case study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(3), 344–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., & Ribot, S. (2014). The integrated reporting movement: Meaning, momentum, motives, and materiality. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L. (2013). IC 21: Reflections from 21 years of IC practice and theory. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferenhof, H. A., Durst, S., Zaniboni Bialecki, M., & Selig, P. M. (2015). Intellectual capital dimensions: State of the art in 2014. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 58–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, J. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27(March), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garanina, T., & Dumay, J. (2017). Forward-looking intellectual capital disclosure in IPOs. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(1), 128–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-meca, E., Parra, I., Larrán, M., & Martínez, I. (2005). The explanatory factors of intellectual capital disclosure to financial analysts. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 63–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerpott, T. J., Thomas, S. E., & Hoffmann, A. P. (2008). Intangible asset disclosure in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1), 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M. (2016). Sensemaking, sensegiving and sensebreaking: The case of intellectual capital measurements. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 218–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M., Chiucchi, M. S., & Marasca, S. (2016). A history of intellectual capital measurements: From production to consumption. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(3), 590–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M., & Marasca, S. (2011). Construction and valuation of intellectual capital: A case study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012). Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research. British Accounting Review, 44(2), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incollingo, A., & Bianchi, M. (2016). The connectivity of information in integrated reporting. Empirical evidence from international context. Financial Reporting, 7(2), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The international IR framework. London.

  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B., & Zambon, S. (2003). Intangibles and intellectual capital: An introduction to a special issue. European Accounting Review, 12(4), 597–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melloni, G. (2015). Intellectual capital disclosure in integrated reporting: An impression management analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(3), 661–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melloni, G., Stacchezzini, R., & Lai, A. (2016). The tone of business model disclosure: An impression management analysis of the integrated reports. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(2), 295–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, J. (2006). Problematising intellectual capital research: Ostensive versus performative IC. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 820–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, J., Johansen, M. R., Larsen, H. T., & Bukh, P. N. (2001a). Reading an intellectual capital statement. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, J., Larsen, H. T., & Bukh, P. N. (2001b). Intellectual capital and the “capable firm”: Narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7–8), 735–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C., Nikolaj Bukh, P., Mouritsen, J., Rosenkrands Johansen, M., & Gormsen, P. (2006). Intellectual capital statements on their way to the stock exchange. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(2), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, L., Lima Rodrigues, L., & Craig, R. (2010). Intellectual capital reporting in sustainability reports. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(4), 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrini, M. (2007). Human capital convergences in intellectual capital and sustainability reports. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(2), 346–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perego, P., Kennedy, S., & Whiteman, G. (2016). A lot of icing but little cake? Taking integrated reporting forward. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136(Part A), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucci, T., Simoni, C., & Zanni, L. (2015). Measuring the relationship between marketing assets, intellectual capital and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(3), 589–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), 238–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A. (1986). Creating shareholder value. A guide for managers and investors. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacchezzini, R., Melloni, G., & Lai, A. (2016). Sustainability management and reporting: The role of integrated reporting for communicating corporate sustainability management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136(Part A), 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayles, M., Bramley, A., Adshead, N., & Farr, J. (2002). Dealing with the management of intellectual capital: The potential role of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G., Lee, A., & Tower, G. (2007). Drivers of voluntary intellectual capital disclosure in listed biotechnology companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WICI. (2016). WICI intangibles reporting framework (Version 1.). WICI.

  • Yi, A., & Davey, H. (2010). Intellectual capital disclosure in Chinese (mainland) companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(3), 326–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2015). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). London: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambon, S. (2016). Ten years after: The past, the present and the future of scholarly investigation on intangibles and intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(1), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambon, S., & Guenther, T. W. (2011). Special issue: Measuring and managing intangibles for accounting use. Journal of Management Control, 22(3), 237–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambon, S., & Marzo, G. (Eds.). (2007). Visualising Intangibles: Measuring and Reporting in the Knowledge Economy. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Badia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badia, F., Dicuonzo, G., Petruzzelli, S. et al. Integrated reporting in action: mobilizing intellectual capital to improve management and governance practices. J Manag Gov 23, 299–320 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9420-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9420-1

Keywords

Navigation