Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Closing the Womb Door: Contraception Use and Fertility Transition Among Culturally Tibetan Women in Highland Nepal

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives Whether in metropoles or remote mountain communities, the availability and adoption of contraceptive technologies prompt serious and wide-ranging biological, social, and political-economic questions. The potential shifts in women’s capacities to create spaces between pregnancies or to prevent future pregnancies have profound and often positive biological, demographic, and socioeconomic implications. Less acknowledged, however, are the ambivalences that women experience around contraception use—vacillations between moral frameworks, generational difference, and gendered forms of labor that have implications well beyond the boundaries of an individual’s reproductive biology. This paper hones in on contraceptive use of culturally Tibetan women in two regions of highland Nepal whose reproductive lives occurred from 1943 to 2012. Methods We describe the experiences of the 296 women (out of a study of more than 1000 women’s reproductive histories) who used contraception, and under what circumstances, examining socioeconomic, geographic, and age differences as well as points of access and patterns of use. We also provide a longitudinal perspective on fertility. Results Our results relate contraception usage to fertility decline, as well as to differences in access between the two communities of women. Conclusions We argue that despite seemingly similar social ecologies of these two study sites—including stated reasons for the adoption of contraception and expressed ambivalence around its use, some of which are linked to moral and cosmological understandings that emerge from Buddhism—the dynamics of contraception uptake in these two regions are distinct, as are, therefore, patterns of fertility transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the proximate determinants of fertility model commonly used by demographers, use and effectiveness of contraception is one of the seven major socioeconomic and environmental variables that affect fertility. In contemporary societies contraceptive usage has the most significant influence on achieving low fertility [42].

  2. As illustrated by this information about contraceptive availability in Nubri and Mustang, the authors with long-term and ongoing fieldwork in these regions include for context data about general healthcare infrastructure and contraceptive ability that extends beyond the period in 2012 when data used for the statistical analyses in this paper were collected.

  3. In revising this paper, one reviewer mentioned that this seemed like a question that could be interpreted as a reference to abortion. This is not the case. Abortion is described in Tibetan in terms that do not reference “medicine” (men) but rather in various ways that describe the agentive act of “taking a baby out before its time,” “making the baby no more” or, more rarely, a direct reference to killing the unborn fetus. During our fieldwork, we asked the following question in vernacular Tibetan: trugu ma khorwa men se song e? This translates literally as “[did you] eat medicine to make a baby not be conceived?” This was often preceded or followed by: “men se song e? khab gyab song e?” which, literally translates, means “Did you eat medicines? Did you use an injection?” for women to understand that we were speaking of contraception. Interestingly, the idea of “eating medicine” here covers several contraceptive choices, from the less common birth control pill to the more common use of norplant. The reference to injections speaks directly to Depo-provera. Once we asked these questions, if the answer was “yes” we then discussed the specific method(s) used.

  4. Relative wealth ranking is a method to rank households according to wealth status using emic criteria [43].

  5. The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) is a standardized measure of the average number of children that would be born to each woman if Age-Specific Fertility Rates (ASFRs, births in a year to women aged x divided by the number of women aged x at midyear) remain constant. The TFR is an estimate of the number of children that would be born to a hypothetical cohort of women, not to an actual cohort of women. To estimate fertility we used the Own-Children method (henceforth, OCM), a reverse-survival technique designed to calculate Total Fertility Rates in the absence of detailed data on reproduction [29]. Reverse-survival uses a population’s current age structure and assumptions about mortality to reconstruct that population’s age structure at a previous time. OCM has been applied to large datasets such as national censuses from various countries [4447] as well as household surveys to estimate fertility in small-scale populations studied by anthropologists [39]. A recent reappraisal of the method finds that in some cases it is more accurate than fertility estimates derived from full birth histories [35]. Our data comes from two surveys: 2012 Nubri, Tsum, and Mustang household and reproductive history survey and 2013 Nubri household and reproductive history survey.

  6. We note controversies in the United States, Canada, and India over the use of Depo-Provera as examples. Vitzthum et al. [50] discusses these issues in relation to hormonal contraception and physiology in non-western contexts.

  7. Personal communication with Margaret Swift. In 2002 she interviewed several women in Nubri about birthing difficulties and family planning issues.

  8. Such comparisons between women and domestic animals also appears in Jan Brunson’s [16] introduction to her new book on Nepal’s family planning history. In the Introduction, she recounts a contentious moment during International Women’s Day in 2002 when the Family Planning Association of Nepal published a poster, the title of which was “Am I am man’s wife or a rooster’s hen?” While there was controversy over this message, this idea of women being compared to reproductive beings with no agency over their reproductive lives resonates.

References

  1. Ginsberg, F., & Rapp, R. (1995). Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Greenhalgh, S. (Ed.). (1995). Situating fertility: Anthropology and demographic inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, A., Sobo, E. J., & Thompson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). Contraception across cultures: Technologies, choices, constraints. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Inhorn, M. (2007). Reproductive disruptions: Gender, technology, and biopolitics in the new millennium. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gutmann, M. (2007). Fixing men: Sex, birth control, and AIDS in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bledsoe, C., Banja, F., & Hill, A. G. (1998). Reproductive mishaps and western contraception: An African challenge to fertility theory. Population and Development Review, 24(1), 15–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sargent, C. F. (2006). Reproductive strategies and islamic discourses. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20(1), 31–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirsch, J. S. (2008). Catholics using contraceptives: Religion, family planning, and interpretive agency in rural Mexico. Studies in Family Planning, 39(2), 93–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunson, J. (2010). Son preference in the context of fertility decline: Limits to new constructions of gender and kinship in Nepal. Studies in Family Planning, 41(2), 89–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes, C. L. (2011). The ‘amazing’ fertility decline: Islam, economics, and reproductive decision making among working-class Moroccan women. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 25(4), 417–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gwatkin, D. R. (1979). Political will and family planning: The implications of India’s emergency experience. Population and Development Review, 5(1), 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, C. H. (1984). The forced sterilization program under the Indian emergency: Results in one settlement. Human Organization, 43(1), 49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenhalgh, S. (2008). Just one child: Science and policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaterjee, N., & Riley, N. (2001). Planning an Indian modernity: The gendered politics of fertility control. Signs, 26(3), 812–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeffery, P., & Jeffery, R. (2006). Confronting saffron demography: Religion, fertility, and women’s status in India. New Delhi: Three Essays Collective.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brunson, J. Planning families in Nepal: Global and local projects of reproduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. (in press).

  17. Goldstein, M., Jiao, B., & Beall, C. M. (2002). Fertility and family planning in rural Tibet. China Journal, 47, 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aengst, J. (2011). Reproductive politics at the border: Pronatalism, intermarriage, and moral movements in Ladakh, India. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis.

  19. Aengst, J. (2014). Adolescent movements: Dating, elopement, and youth policing in Ladakh, India. Ethnos,. doi:10.1080/00141844.2013.817459.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Childs, G., & Barkin, G. (2006). Reproducing identity: Using images to promote pronatalism and sexual endogamy among Tibetan exiles in South Asia. Visual Anthropology Review, 22(2), 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aengst, J. (2012). The politics of fertility: Population and pronatalism in Ladakh. Himalaya, 32(1–2), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Childs, G. (2008). Tibetan transitions: Historical and contemporary perspectives on fertility, family, planning, and demographic change. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Schrempf, M. (2011). Re-production at stake—Experiences of fertility, family planning and reproductive health among Amdo Tibetan women. In H. Fjeld & R. Hofer (Eds.) Women and gender in Tibetan medicine (special issue). Asian medicineTradition and modernity, 6(2), 314–339. doi:10.1163/15734218-12341237.

  24. Adams, V. (2005). Moral orgasm and productive sex: Tantrism faces fertility control in Lhasa, Tibet (China). In V. Adams & S. L. Pigg (Eds.), Sex in development: Science, sexuality, and morality in global perspective (pp. 207–240). Durham, NC: Duke Univeristy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Tuladhar, J. M., Gubhaju, B. B., & Stoeckel, J. (1978). Population and family planning in Nepal. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schuler, S. R., Noel McIntosh, E., Goldstein, M. C., & Pande, B. R. (1985). Barriers to effective family planning in Nepal. Studies in Family Planning, 16(5), 260–270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tuladar, J. M. (1987). Effects of family planning availability and accessibility on contraceptive use in Nepal. Studies in Family Planning, 18(1), 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gubhaju, B. (2009). Barriers to sustained use of contraception in Nepal: Quality of care, socioeconomic status, and method-related factors. Biodemography and Social Biology,. doi:10.1080/19485560902964671.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Satyavada, A., & Adamchak, D. J. (2000). Determinants of current use of contraception and children ever born in Nepal. Social Biology,. doi:10.1080/19485565.2000.9989009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Folmar, S. (1992). Wives’ roles in fertility decision-making among Nepalese caste-hindus. Central Issues in Anthropology, 10(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Höfer, A. (2004 [1979]). The caste hierarchy and the state in Nepal: A study of the Muluki Ain of 1854. Lalitpur: Himal Books.

  32. Childs, G. (2004). Tibetan diary: From birth to death and beyond in a Himalayan Valley of Nepal. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Craig, S. R., Chase, L., & Lama, T. N. (2010). Taking the MINI to Mustang, Nepal: Methodological and epistemological translations of illness narrative interviews. Anthropology and Medicine, 17(1), 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Craig, S. R. (2012). Healing elements: Efficacy and the social ecologies of Tibetan medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Beall, C. M., & Leslie, P. W. (2014). Collecting women’s reproductive histories. American Journal of Human Biology, 26(5), 577–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Childs, G., Craig, S. R., Beall, C. M., & Basnyat, B. (2014). Depopulating the Himalayan highlands: Education and outmigration from ethnically Tibetan Communities of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 34(2), 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Retherford, R. D., & Shyam, T. (1998). Fertility trends in Nepal, 1977–1995. Contributions to Nepalese studies: Fertility transition in Nepal, 25(Special Issue), 9–58.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) [Nepal], New ERA, and ICF International Inc. 2012. Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. (2011). Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health and Population, New ERA, and ICF International, Calverton, Maryland (pp. 76, 99).

  39. Childs, G., Goldstein, M. C., & Wangdui, P. (2013). Balancing people, policies, and resources in rural Tibet. In E. Brondizio & E. F. Moran (Eds.), Human-environment interactions: Current and future directions (pp. 53–78). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Garrett, F. (2008). Religion, medicine, and the human embryo in Tibet: Becoming human in Tibetan literature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gyatso, J. (2015). Being human in a Buddhist world: An intellectual history of medicine in early modern Tibet. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Bongaarts, J., & Potter, R. G. (1983). Fertility, biology, and behavior: An analysis of the proximate determinants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Grandin, B. (1988). Wealth ranking in smallholder communities: A field manual. Rugby: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Cho, L.-J., Retherford, R. D., & Choe, M. K. (1986). The own-children method of fertility estimation. Honolulu: East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Retherford, R. D., Cho, L.-J., & Kim, N.-I. (1984). Census-derived estimates of fertility by duration of first marriage in the Republic of Korea. Demography, 21(4), 537–558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schroeder, R., & Retherford, R. D. (1979). Application of the own-children method of fertility estimation to an anthropological census of a Nepalese village. Demography India, 8(1–2), 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Avery, C., St. Clair, T., Levin, M., & Hill, K. (2013). The ‘own children’ fertility estimation procedure: A reappraisal. Population Studies, 67(2), 171–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hirsch, J. S., Meneses, Sergio, Thompson, B., Negroni, M., Pelcastre, B., & del Rio, C. (2007). The inevitability of infidelity: Sexual reputation, social geographies, and marital HIV risk in rural Mexico. American Journal of Public Health, 97(6), 986–996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Smith, D. (2014). AIDS doesn’t show its face: Inequality, morality, and social change in Nigeria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Vitzthum, V. J., & Ringheim, K. (2005). Hormonal contraception and physiology: A research based theory for differences in discontinuation due to side effects. Studies in Family Planning, 36, 13–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Most of the data presented in this paper was gathered in the summer of 2012 during a project titled Genes and the Fertility of Tibetan Women at High Altitude in Nepal, which was sponsored by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. BCS-1153911). Additional Funding was provided by grants from the Claire Garber Goodman Fund, the Rockefeller Center, and the Dean of Faculty Innovation and Advancement Fund, at Dartmouth College. The Institutional Review Boards of Case Western Reserve University, Washington University, Dartmouth College, Oxtrec, and the Nepal Health Research Council approved the research protocol. We would like to thank our fieldwork assistants for their hard work and dedication to the project: for Nubri and Tsum, Ang Tsering, Jangchuk Sangmo, Tinley Tsering, Tsechu Dolma, and Tsering Buti; for Mustang, Kunzom Thakuri, Karma Chödron, ‘‘Apu’’ Karma Cho¨dron, Diki Dolkar Gurung, Yangjin Bista, Karchung Gurung, Nawang Tsering Gurung, and Tashi Bista. We also thank the study communities and volunteers for their hospitality and participation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sienna R. Craig.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Craig, S.R., Childs, G. & Beall, C.M. Closing the Womb Door: Contraception Use and Fertility Transition Among Culturally Tibetan Women in Highland Nepal. Matern Child Health J 20, 2437–2450 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2017-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2017-x

Keywords

Navigation