Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neonatal Mortality Reflect Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal Health Services? Evidence from 48 Low- and Middle-Income Countries

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To examine socioeconomic and health system determinants of wealth-related inequalities in neonatal mortality rates (NMR) across 48 low- and middle-income countries.

Methods

We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2006 and 2012. Absolute and relative inequalities for NMR and coverage of antenatal care, facility-based delivery, and Caesarean delivery were measured using the Slope Index of Inequality and Relative Index of Inequality, respectively. Meta-regression was used to assess whether variation in the magnitude of NMR inequalities was associated with inequalities in coverage of maternal health services, and whether country-level economic and health system factors were associated with mean NMR and socioeconomic inequality in NMR.

Results

Of the three maternal health service indicators examined, the magnitude of socioeconomic inequality in NMR was most strongly related to inequalities in antenatal care. NMR inequality was greatest in countries with higher out-of-pocket health expenditures, more doctors per capita, and a higher adolescent fertility rate. Determinants of lower mean NMR (e.g., higher government health expenditures and a greater number of nurses/midwives per capita) differed from factors associated with lower NMR inequality.

Conclusions

Reducing the financial burden of maternal health services and achieving universal coverage of antenatal care may contribute to a reduction in socioeconomic differences in NMR. Further investigation of the mechanisms contributing to these cross-national associations seems warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shiffman, J. (2010). Issue attention in global health: The case of newborn survival. The Lancet, 375(9730), 2045–2049. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60710-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oestergaard, M. Z., Inoue, M., Yoshida, S., Mahanani, W. R., Gore, F. M., Cousens, S., et al. (2011). Neonatal mortality levels for 193 countries in 2009 with trends since 1990: A systematic analysis of progress, projections, and priorities. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), e1001080. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001080.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. You, D., New, J. R., & Wardlaw, T. (2012). Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2012. New York, NY: United Nations Children’s Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  4. REMOVED FOR PEER REVIEW

  5. Målqvist, M., Sohel, N., Do, T. T., Eriksson, L., & Persson, L.-Å. (2010). Distance decay in delivery care utilisation associated with neonatal mortality. A case referent study in northern Vietnam. BMC Public Health. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-762.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Målqvist, M. (2011). Neonatal mortality: An invisible and marginalised trauma. Global Health Action. doi:10.3402/gha.v4i0.5724.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. WHO. (2014). Every Newborn: An action plan to end preventable deaths. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.everynewborn.org/Documents/Full-action-plan-EN.pdf.

  8. Houweling, T. A. J., Morrison, J., Azad, K., Manandhar, D. S., Alcock, G., Shende, S., et al. (2014). Comment: How to reach every newborn: Three key messages. The Lancet Global Health. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70271-2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Victora, C. G., & Barros, A. J. D. (2014). Socioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are falling: But why? The Lancet Global Health, 2(3), e122–e123. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70024-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker, N., Yenokyan, G., Friberg, I. K., & Bryce, J. (2013). Patterns in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: Projections of neonatal and under-5 mortality to 2035. The Lancet, 382(9897), 1029–1038. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61748-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawn, J. E., Kinney, M. V., Black, R. E., Pitt, C., Cousens, S., Kerber, K., et al. (2012). Newborn survival: A multi-country analysis of a decade of change. Health Policy and Planning, 27, iii6–iii28. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Målqvist, M., Yuan, B., Trygg, N., Selling, K., & Thomsen, S. (2013). Targeted interventions for improved equity in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66453. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066453.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Houweling, T., Ronsmans, C., Campbell, O., & Kunst, A. (2007). Huge poor–rich inequalities in maternity care: An international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85, 745–754.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization, UNFPA, United Nations, AMDD. (2009). Monitoring emergency obstetric care: A handbook. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/…/obstetric_monitoring.pdf.

  15. Hajizadeh, M., Nandi, A., & Heymann, J. (2014). Social inequality in infant mortality: What explains variation across low and middle income countries? Social Science and Medicine, 101, 36–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Houweling, T. A. (2005). Determinants of under-5 mortality among the poor and the rich: A cross-national analysis of 43 developing countries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(6), 1257–1265. doi:10.1093/ije/dyi190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Villar, J., Valladares, E., World Bank, Zavaleta, N., Carroli, G., Velazco, A., et al. (2006). Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: The 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. The Lancet, 367(9525), 1819–1829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khawaja, M., Jurdi, R., & Kabakian-Khasholian, T. (2004). Rising trends in cesarean section rates in Egypt. Birth (Berkeley, California), 31(1), 12–16. doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0269.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rutstein, S. O., & Johnson, K. (2004). The DHS wealth index. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Filmer, D., & Scott, K. (2012). Assessing asset indices. Demography, 49(1), 359–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schell, C. O., Reilly, M., Rosling, H., Peterson, S., & Ekström, A. M. (2007). Socioeconomic determinants of infant mortality: A worldwide study of 152 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35(3), 288–297. doi:10.1080/14034940600979171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gakidou, E., Cowling, K., Lozano, R., & Murray, C. J. L. (2010). Increased educational attainment and its effect on child mortality in 175 countries between 1970 and 2009: A systematic analysis. The Lancet, 376(9745), 959–974. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61257-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pamuk, E. R. (1985). Social class inequality in mortality from 1921 to 1972 in England and Wales. Population Studies, 39(1), 17–31. doi:10.1080/0032472031000141256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sterne, J. (2009). Meta-analysis in Stata: An updated collection from the Stata Journal (1st ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harbord, R. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2008). Meta-regression in Stata. The Stata Journal, 8(4), 493–519.

    Google Scholar 

  26. StataCorp. (n.d.). Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

  27. Kruk, M. E. (2013). Universal health coverage: A policy whose time has come. BMJ (Clinical Research ed), 347, f6360. doi:10.1136/bmj.f6360.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brearley, L., Marten, R., & O’Connell, T. (2013). Universal Health Coverage: A commitment to close the gap. London, UK: Save the Children. Retrieved from http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/images/Universal_health_coverage.pdf.

  29. Borghi, J., Ensor, T., Somanathan, A., Lissner, C., Mills, A., & Lancet Maternal Survival Series Steering Group. (2006). Mobilising financial resources for maternal health. The Lancet, 368(9545), 1457–1465. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69383-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Victora, C. G., Fenn, B., Bryce, J., & Kirkwood, B. R. (2005). Co-coverage of preventive interventions and implications for child-survival strategies: Evidence from national surveys. The Lancet, 366(9495), 1460–1466. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67599-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Victora, C. G., Vaughan, J. P., Barros, F. C., & Silva, A. C. (2000). Explaining trends in inequities: Evidence from Brazilian child health studies. The Lancet, 356, 1093–1098.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagstaff, A., Bredenkamp, C., & Buisman, L. R. (2014). Progress on global health goals: Are the poor being left behind? The World Bank Research Observer, 29(2), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cavallaro, F. L., Cresswell, J. A., França, G. V., Victora, C. G., Barros, A. J., & Ronsmans, C. (2013). Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: Cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(12), 914–922.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gwatkin, D., Rutstein, S. O., Johnson, K., Suliman, E., Wagstaff, A., & Amouzou, A. (2007). Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPAH/Resources/IndicatorsOverview.pdf.

  35. Harvey, S. A., Blandón, Y. C. W., McCaw-Binns, A., Sandino, I., Urbina, L., Rodríguez, C., et al. (2007). Are skilled birth attendants really skilled? A measurement method, some disturbing results and a potential way forward. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(10), 783–790. doi:10.1590/S0042-96862007001000015.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sam Harper was supported by a Chercheur-boursier Junior 2 from the Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ). Jay Kaufman was supported by the Canada Research Chairs programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Health and Social Policy, 1030 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A2, Canada

    Britt McKinnon & Jay S. Kaufman

  2. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Britt McKinnon, Sam Harper & Jay S. Kaufman

Authors
  1. Britt McKinnon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sam Harper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jay S. Kaufman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Britt McKinnon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 99 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKinnon, B., Harper, S. & Kaufman, J.S. Do Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neonatal Mortality Reflect Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal Health Services? Evidence from 48 Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Matern Child Health J 20, 434–446 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1841-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1841-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation