Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

2009 H1N1 and Seasonal Influenza Immunization Among Pregnant Women: A Comparison of Different Sources of Immunization Information

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Validity of prenatal immunization data from different sources has not been assessed. We evaluated prenatal 2009 H1N1 and seasonal influenza (FLU) data obtained from state immunization information systems (IIS), medical record abstraction (MRA), and participant recall using medical care logs (NCS–MCL). 2009 H1N1 and FLU data were obtained from IIS and MRA for 325 pregnant women participating in the National Children’s Study at three locations (SD/MN, NC, WI). Women recalled immunizations at first pregnancy visit and at 16–17 and 36 weeks’ gestation (NCS–MCL). The proportion of women with vaccine information obtainable from each data source was determined, and proportions immunized as determined using different data sources were compared. IIS data were available for 82 %, MRA for 97 %, and NCS–MCL for 93 % of women. No mention of either vaccine occurred in 29 % (range 4–48 %) of IIS, 40 % of MRA (25–59 %), and 59 % (43–82 %) in NCS–MCL. Best agreement between sources was 2009 H1N1 vaccine in MRA versus IIS [kappa (95 % CI) of 0.44 (0.32–0.55)], with poorest agreement for FLU in IIS versus NCS–MCL [0.11 (−0.03 to 0.25)]. IIS was the most sensitive method for identifying women receiving 2009 H1N1 vaccine (92 %); MRA was most sensitive for FLU vaccine (81 %). IIS provided the most complete and sensitive data for 2009 H1N1 immunizations and MRA the most complete and sensitive data for FLU; IIS data were available for a smaller percent of population than MRA. NCS–MCL was the least sensitive method for identifying vaccinated women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Landrigan, P., Trasande, L., Thorpe, L., Gwynn, C., Lioy, P. J., D’Alton, M. E., et al. (2006). The National Children’s Study: A 21-year prospective study of 100,000 American children. Pediatrics, 118, 2173–2186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolton, P., Holt, E., Ross, A., Hughart, N., & Guyer, B. (1998). Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards, and medical records. Public Health Reports, 113, 521–526.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luman, E., Ryman, T., & Sablan, M. (2009). Estimating vaccination coverage: Validity of household-retained vaccination cards and parental recall. Vaccine, 27, 2534–2539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walter, E. B., Fuller, J. E., Dole, N., O'Hara, R., Herring, A., Durkin, M., & Specker, B. Childhood immunization data sources: Assessment of feasibility and acceptability for use in child health research. Pediatric Academic Societies, E-PAS2013:1501 (abstract for poster presentation).

  5. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hinman, A. R., & Ross, D. A. (2010). Immunization registries can be building blocks for national health information systems. Health Affairs, 29, 676–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boulton, M. L., Grossman, A. M., Potter, R., Vranesich, P. A., & Clayton, J. (2011). Assessing the relationship between seasonal and H1N1 influenza vaccination status in Michigan children, 2009–2010. Public Health Reports, 126, 70–77.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorell, C. G., Jain, N., & Yankey, D. (2011). Validity of parent-reported vaccination status for adolescents aged 13–17 years: National Immunization Survey—Teen, 2008. Public Health Reports, 126, 60–69.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suarez, L., Simpson, D. M., & Smith, D. R. (1997). Errors and correlates in parental recall of child immunizations: Effects on vaccination coverage estimates. Pediatrics, 99, E3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the South Dakota, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Wisconsin Health Departments for their assistance in accessing the IIS registries. The views expressed in this paper are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the NCS, the National Institutes of Health, or the Department of Health and Human Services. This project was conducted as formative research for the National Children’s Study, supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and funded, through its appropriation, by the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health via contracts HHSN27520063416C and HHSN275201100004C (South Dakota State University Study Center), HHSN275200503413C and HHSN275201100005C (North Carolina Study Center), and HHSN275200503396C and HHSN275201100014C (University of Wisconsin Madison Study Center). It also was supported in part by the Ethel Austin Martin Endowment at South Dakota State University and R24 HD050924 awarded to the Carolina Population Center at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonny Specker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Specker, B., Wey, B., Fuller, J. et al. 2009 H1N1 and Seasonal Influenza Immunization Among Pregnant Women: A Comparison of Different Sources of Immunization Information. Matern Child Health J 18, 681–687 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1293-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1293-y

Keywords

Navigation