Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disparities in Cesarean Delivery by Ethnicity and Nativity in New York City

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to examine differences in risk of cesarean delivery among diverse ethnic groups in New York City. Using cross-sectional New York City birth and hospitalization data from 1995 to 2003 (n = 961,381) we estimated risk ratios for ethnic groups relative to non-Hispanic whites and immigrant women relative to US-born women. Adjusting for insurance, pre-pregnancy weight, maternal age, education, parity, birthweight, gestational age, year, medical complications, and pregnancy complications, all ethnic groups except East Asian women were at an increased risk of cesarean delivery, with the highest risk among Hispanic Caribbean women [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.27, 95 % CI (confidence interval) = 1.24, 1.30] and African American women (aRR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 1.17, 1.23). Among Hispanic groups, immigrant status further increased adjusted risk of cesarean delivery; adjusted risk ratios for foreign-born women compared to US-born women of the same ethnic group were 1.27 for Mexican women (95 % CI = 1.05, 1.53), 1.23 for Hispanic Caribbean women (95 % CI = 1.20, 1.27), and 1.12 for Central/South American women (95 % CI = 1.04, 1.21). Similar patterns were found in subgroup analyses of low-risk women (term delivery and no pregnancy or medical complications) and primiparous women. We found evidence of disparities by ethnicity and nativity in cesarean delivery rates after adjusting for multiple risk factors. Efforts to reduce rates of cesarean delivery should address these disparities. Future research should explore potential explanations including hospital environment, provider bias, and patient preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brennan, D. J., Robson, M. S., Murphy, M., & O’Herlihy, C. (2009). Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201(3), 308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Declercq, E., Menacker, F., MacDorman, M. (2006). Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991–2002. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 867–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MacDorman, M. F., Menacker, F., & Declercq, E. (2008). Cesarean birth in the United States: Epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clinics in Perinatology, 35(2), 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Srinivas, S. K., Fager, C., & Lorch, S. A. (2010). Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 115(5), 1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryant, A. S., Washington, S., Kuppermann, M., Cheng, Y. W., & Caughey, A. B. (2009). Quality and equality in obstetric care: Racial and ethnic differences in caesarean section delivery rates. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 23(5), 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kabir, A. A., Pridjian, G., Steinmann, W. C., Herrera, E. A., & Khan, M. M. (2005). Racial differences in cesareans: An analysis of US 2001 national inpatient sample data. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 105(4), 710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Braveman, P., Egerter, S., Edmonston, F., & Verdon, M. (1995). Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California. American Journal of Public Health, 85(5), 625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aron, D. C., Gordon, H. S., DiGiuseppe, D. L., Harper, D. L., & Rosenthal, G. E. (2000). Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance. Medical Care, 38(1), 35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Irwin, D. E., Savitz, D. A., Bowes, W. A., & St André, K. A. (1996). Race, age, and cesarean delivery in a military population*. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 88(4), 530–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Washington, S., Caughey, A. B., Cheng, Y. W., & Bryant, A. S. (2012). Racial and ethnic differences in indication for primary cesarean delivery at term: Experience at one US institution. Birth, 39(2), 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung, J. H., Garite, T. J., Kirk, A. M., Hollard, A. L., Wing, D. A., & Lagrew, D. C. (2006). Intrinsic racial differences in the risk of cesarean delivery are not explained by differences in caregivers or hospital site of delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(5), 1323–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zlot, A. I., Jackson, D. J., & Korenbrot, C. (2005). Association of acculturation with cesarean section among latinas. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9(1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Savitz, D. A., Janevic, T. M., Engel, S. M., Kaufman, J. S., & Herring, A. H. (2008). Ethnicity and gestational diabetes in New York city, 1995–2003. BJOG, 115(8), 969–978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Janevic, T., Stein, C., Savitz, D., Kaufman, J., Mason, S., & Herring, A. (2010). Neighborhood deprivation and adverse birth outcomes among diverse ethnic groups. Annals of Epidemiology, 20(6), 445–451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yasmeen, S., Romano, P. S., Schembri, M. E., Keyzer, J. M., & Gilbert, W. M. (2006). Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(4), 992–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenberg, T. J., Garbers, S., Lipkind, H., & Chiasson, M. A. (2005). Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: Differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups. American Journal of Public Health, 95(9), 1545–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spiegelman, D., & Hertzmark, E. (2005). Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162(3), 199–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huesch, M. D. (2011). Association between type of health insurance and elective cesarean deliveries: New Jersey, 2004–2007. American Journal of Public Health, 101(11), e1–e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stein, C. R., Savitz, D. A., Janevic, T., Ananth, C. V., Kaufman, J. S., Herring, A. H., et al. (2009). Maternal ethnic ancestry and adverse perinatal outcomes in New York City. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201(6), 584.e1–584.e9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smedley, B. D., & Stith, A. Y. (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: Natl Academy Press.

  21. Lipkind, H. S., Duzyj, C., Rosenberg, T. J., Funai, E. F., Chavkin, W., & Chiasson, M. A. (2009). Disparities in cesarean delivery rates and associated adverse neonatal outcomes in New York City hospitals. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 113(6), 1239–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dovidio, J. F., Penner, L. A., Albrecht, T. L., Norton, W. E., Gaertner, S. L., & Shelton, J. N. (2008). Disparities and distrust: The implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health care. Social Science and Medicine, 67(3), 478–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. van Ryn, M., Burgess, D., Dovidio, J., Phelan, S., Saha, S., Malat, J., et al. (2011). The impact of racism on clinician cognition, behavior, and clinical decision making. Du Bois Review, 8(1), 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barber, E. L., Lundsberg, L. S., Belanger, K., Pettker, C. M., Funai, E. F., & Illuzzi, J. L. (2011). Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118(1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khunpradit, S., Tavender, E., Lumbiganon, P., Laopaiboon, M., Wasiak, J., & Gruen, R. L. (2011). Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6):CD005528. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, UMDNJ School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West, Room 209, PO Box 9, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA

    T. Janevic

  2. School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    E. Loftfield & E. Bradley

  3. Departments of Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

    D. A. Savitz

  4. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

    J. Illuzzi & H. Lipkind

Authors
  1. T. Janevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Loftfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. A. Savitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Bradley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Illuzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Lipkind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Janevic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janevic, T., Loftfield, E., Savitz, D.A. et al. Disparities in Cesarean Delivery by Ethnicity and Nativity in New York City. Matern Child Health J 18, 250–257 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1261-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1261-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation