Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health Care Utilization in the First Year of Life among Small- and Large- for-Gestational Age Term Infants

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess if small- and large-for gestational age term infants have greater health care utilization during the first year of life. The sample included 28,215 singleton term infants (37–42 weeks) without major birth defects delivered from 1998 through 2007 and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northwest for 12 months after delivery. Birth weight for gestational age was categorized into 3 levels: <10th percentile (SGA), 10–90th percentile (AGA), >90th percentile (LGA). Length of delivery hospitalization, re-hospitalizations and sick/emergency room visits were obtained from electronic records. Logistic regression models estimated associations between birth weight category and re-hospitalization. Generalized linear models estimated adjusted mean number of sick/emergency visits. Among term infants, 6.2 % were SGA and 13.9 % were LGA. Of infants born by cesarean section, SGA infants had 2.7 higher odds [95 % 1.9, 3.8] than AGA infants of staying ≥5 nights during the delivery hospitalization; of those born vaginally, SGA infants had 1.5 higher adjusted odds [95 % 1.1, 2.1] of staying ≥4 nights. LGA compared to AGA infants had higher odds of re-hospitalization within 2 weeks of delivery [OR 1.25, 95 % CI 0.99, 1.58] and of a length of stay ≥4 days during that hospitalization [OR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.3, 5.0]. The adjusted mean number of sick/emergency room visits was slightly higher in SGA (7.8) than AGA (7.5) infants (P < .05). Term infants born SGA or LGA had greater health care utilization than their counterparts, although the increase in utilization beyond the initial delivery hospitalization was small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Minior, V. K., & Divon, M. Y. (1998). Fetal growth restriction at term: Myth or reality? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 92(1), 57–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, X., Decker, A., Platt, R. W., & Kramer, M. S. (2008). How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 198(5), 517.e1–517.e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stotland, N. E., Caughey, A. B., Breed, E. M., & Escobar, G. J. (2004). Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macromia. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 87(3), 220–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McIntire, D. D., Bloom, S. L., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (1999). Birthweight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(16), 1234–1238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seeds, J. W., & Peng, J. (1998). Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: Is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 178, 658–669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hornbrook, M. C., Whitlock, E. P., Berg, C. J., et al. (2006). Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes in an integrated health care delivery system. Health Services Research, 42, 908–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Callaghan, W. M., & Dietz, P. M. (2010). Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 171(7), 826–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maisels, M. S., & Kring, E. A. (1998). Length of stay, jaundice, and hospital readmission. Pediatrics, 101, 995–998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiu, X., Lodha, A., Shah, P. S., Sankaran, K., Seshia, M. M., Yee, W., et al. (2012). Canadian Neonatal Network. Neonatal outcomes for small for gestational age preterm infants in Canada. American Journal of Perinatology, 29(2), 87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luu, T. M., Lefebvre, F., Riley, P., & Infante-Rivard, C. (2010). Continuing utilisation of specialised health services in extremely preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 95(5), F320–F325.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bird, T. M., Bronstein, J. M., Hall, R. W., Lowery, C. L., Nugent, R., & Mays, G. P. (2010). Late preterm infants: birth outcomes and health care utilization in the first year. Pediatrics, 126(2), e311–e319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or Kaiser Permanente.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia M. Dietz.

 

 

Appendix 1 2004 United States birth weight cut points for the <10th and >90th percentiles by gestational age, sex, and race/ethnicity for singleton term infants
Appendix 2 Definitions of grouped conditions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, P.M., Rizzo, J.H., England, L.J. et al. Health Care Utilization in the First Year of Life among Small- and Large- for-Gestational Age Term Infants. Matern Child Health J 17, 1016–1024 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1082-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1082-z

Keywords

Navigation