Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variation by State in Outcomes Classification for Deliveries Less Than 500 g in the United States

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore state-level fetal death rates and <24 h infant mortality rates for deliveries less than 500 g in order to estimate outcomes classification differences at the edge of viability. We selected singleton deliveries to US resident mothers born <500 g and >20 weeks gestation from the NCHS live birth-infant death and fetal death files for 1999–2002 (n = 37,813). Infant deaths within 24 h of birth were selected to estimate odds of classification as a fetal death versus a live birth/infant death by state. Logistic regression was used to derive odds of classification as a fetal death and to adjust for maternal characteristics, calculating unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios. We identified 37,813 outcomes from 48 states reporting in this birthweight category. Unadjusted odds of classification of outcomes as a fetal death versus a live birth/death within 24 h by state ranged from OR = 0.38 (95% CI = 0.24–0.59) to OR = 2.93 (95% CI = 2.26–3.78); adjusted for maternal age and race, the range narrowed slightly to a OR = 0.31 (95% CI = 0.20–0.48) to aOR = 2.54 (95% CI = 1.96–3.30). Six states were more likely to classify outcomes as a live birth/infant death, while 14 states were more likely to classify as a fetal death, when compared to a large reference state. The remaining states did not differ significantly in their outcomes. The fraction of outcomes classified as fetal deaths varied by state during the years studied. This study suggests fetal death and early infant death outcomes reported for babies less than 500 g reflect differential classification thus influencing the validity of these vital statistics data at the state level. Further studies are needed to explore the factors that influence these differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee, K. S., Khoshnood, B., Hsieh, H., Kim, B. I., Schreiber, M. D., & Mittendorf, R. (1995). Which birthweight groups contributed most to the overall reduction in the neonatal mortality rate in the United States from 1960 to 1986? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 9(4), 420–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin, J. A., Kochanek, K. D., Strobino, D. M., Guyer, B., & MacDorman, M. F. (2005). Annual summary of vital statistics—2003. Pediatrics, 115(3), 619–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, B. E., Minino, A. M., Martin, J. A., Kochanek, K. D., Strobino, D. M., & Guyer, B. (2007). Annual summary of vital statistics: 2005. Pediatrics, 119(2), 345–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph, K. S., Kramer, M. S., Allen, A. C., Cyr, M., Fair, M., Ohlsson, A., et al. (2000). Gestational age- and birthweight-specific declines in infant mortality in Canada, 1985–94. Fetal and infant health study group of the canadian perinatal surveillance system. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 14(4), 332–339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paul, D. A., Mackley, A., Locke, R. G., Stefano, J. L., & Kroelinger, C. (2009). State infant mortality: An ecologic study to determine modifiable risks and adjusted infant mortality rates. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 13(3), 343–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Racial/ethnic trends in fetal mortality—United States, 1990–2000. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 53(24), 529–532.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MacDorman, M. F., Hoyert, D. L., Martin, J. A., Munson, M. L., & Hamilton, B. E. (2007). Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2003. National Vital Statistics Reports, 55(6), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacDorman, M. F., Munson, M. L., & Kirmeyer, S. (2007). Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2004. National vital statistics reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

  9. MacDorman, M. F., & Kirmeyer, S. (2009). Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports, 57(8), 1–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kochanek, K. D., & Martin, J. A. (2005). Supplemental analyses of recent trends in infant mortality. International Journal of Health Services, 35(1), 101–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, J. A., Kung, H. C., Mathews, T. J., Hoyert, D. L., Strobino, D. M., Guyer, B., et al. (2008). Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006. Pediatrics, 121(4), 788–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Joseph, K. S., & Kramer, M. S. (1996). Recent trends in Canadian infant mortality rates: effect of changes in registration of live newborns weighing less than 500 g. CMAJ, 155(8), 1047–1052.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph, K. S., & Kramer, M. S. (1997). Recent trends in infant mortality rates and proportions of low-birth-weight live births in Canada. Cmaj, 157(5), 535–541.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Phelan, S. T., Goldenberg, R., Alexander, G., & Cliver, S. P. (1998). Perinatal mortality and its relationship to the reporting of low-birthweight infants. American Journal of Public Health, 88(8), 1236–1239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander, G. R., Himes, J. H., Kaufman, R. B., Mor, J., & Kogan, M. (1996). A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87(2), 163–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MacDorman, M. F., Martin, J. A., Mathews, T. J., Hoyert, D. L., & Ventura, S. J. (2005). Explaining the 2001–2002 infant mortality increase in the United States: Data from the linked birth/infant death data set. International Journal of Health Services, 35(3), 415–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petersen, D. J., & Alexander, G. R. (1997). Threats to accurate interpretation of secondary data. In J. B. Kotch (Ed.), Maternal and child health: Programs, problems and policy in public health (pp. 395–404). Gaithersburg: Aspen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alexander, G. R., Petersen, D. J., Wingate, M. S., & Kirby, R. S. (2005). Research issues in maternal and child health. In J. B. Kotch (Ed.), Maternal and child health: Programs, problems and policy in public health (2nd ed., pp. 493–533). Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah B. Ehrenthal.

Additional information

This study was performed without any financial support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ehrenthal, D.B., Wingate, M.S. & Kirby, R.S. Variation by State in Outcomes Classification for Deliveries Less Than 500 g in the United States. Matern Child Health J 15, 42–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0566-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0566-y

Keywords

Navigation