Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Couple Context of Pregnancy and its Effects on Prenatal Care and Birth Outcomes

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The couple context of pregnancy and newborn health is gaining importance with the increase in births to unmarried couples, a disproportionate number of which were not intended. This study investigates the association of early prenatal care, preterm birth, and low birth weight with the couple relationship context, including partners’ joint intentions for the pregnancy, their marital status at conception, and the presence of relationship problems during pregnancy. Data are drawn from the first wave of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study––Birth Cohort, a representative study of births in 2001. The sample is composed of parents residing together with their biological child at the time the child is 9 months old, where both the mother and father completed the self-report interview (N = 5,788). Couple-level multivariate logistic regression models, weighted to account for the complex sampling design, were used in the analysis. Risk of inadequate prenatal care and preterm birth was increased when partners did not share intentions or when neither partner intended the pregnancy. Couples were at additional risk of inadequate prenatal care when the pregnancy was conceived nonmaritally and when the mother did not tell the father about the pregnancy, particularly when neither partner intended the pregnancy. The risk of premature birth was particularly high when the partners were unmarried and either or both did not intend the pregnancy. The couple context of pregnancy is important for a healthy pregnancy and birth. When the partner is present, practitioners and programs should maintain a focus on the couple, and researchers should make every effort to include the father’s own perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin, L. T., McNamara, M. J., Milot, A. S., Halle, T., & Hair, E. C. (2007). The effects of father involvement during pregnancy on receipt of prenatal care and maternal smoking. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11, 595–602. doi:10.1007/s10995-007-0209-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schafer, M. A., & Lia-Hoagberg, B. (1997). Effects of social support on prenatal care and health behaviors of low-income women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 26, 433–440. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1997.tb02725.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman, P. J., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Sandman, C. A., & Wadhwa, P. D. (2000). Maternal social support predicts birth weight and fetal growth in human pregnancy. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 715–725.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Padilla, Y., & Reichman, N. (2001). Low birthweight: Do unwed fathers help? Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 505–530. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(01)00136-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Messer, L. C., Dole, N., Kaufman, J. S., & Savitzl, D. A. (2005). Pregnancy intendedness, maternal psychosocial factors and preterm birth. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9, 403–412. doi:10.1007/s10995-005-0021-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hobel, C. J. (2004). Stress and preterm birth. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 47, 856–880. doi:10.1097/01.grf.0000142512.38733.8c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dole, N., Savitz, D. A., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Siega-Riz, A. M., McMahon, M. J., & Buekens, P. (2003). Maternal stress and preterm birth. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157, 14–24. doi:10.1093/aje/kwf176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (1992). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964–980. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 90–96. doi:10.1363/3809006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, S. S., & Eisenberg, L. (Eds.). (1995). The best intentions: Unwanted pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Axinn, W. G., Barber, J. S., & Thornton, A. (1998). The long-term impact of parents’ childbearing decisions on children’s self-esteem. Demography, 35, 435–443. doi:10.2307/3004012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Altfield, S., Handler, A., Burton, D., & Berman, L. (1998). Wantedness of pregnancy and prenatal health behaviors. Women and Health, 26, 29–43. doi:10.1300/J013v26n04_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, L. B. (1994). Determinants of couple agreement in U.S. fertility decisions. Family Planning Perspectives, 26, 169–173. doi:10.2307/2136242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, L., & Sobieszczyk, T. (2003). Couple attitudes and agreement regarding pregnancy wantedness in the Philippines. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 1019–1030. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.01019.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sangi-Haghpeykar, H., Mehta, M., Posner, S., Poindexter, A. N., & II, I. (2005). Paternal influences on the timing of prenatal care among Hispanics. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9, 159–163. doi:10.1007/s10995-005-3012-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (November 21, 2006). Births: Preliminary data for 2005. National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/prelimbirths05/prelimbirths05.htm).

  18. Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41, 237–261. doi:10.1353/dem.2004.0012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bird, S. T., Chandra, A., Bennett, T., & Harvey, S. M. (2000). Beyond marital status: Relationship type and duration and the risk of low birth weight. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 281–287. doi:10.2307/2648196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). User’s manual for the ECLS-B nine-month restricted-use data file and electronic code book. Washington, DC.

  22. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 889–900. doi:10.2307/351453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanford, J. B., Hobbs, R., Jameson, P., DeWitt, M. J., & Fischer, R. C. (2000). Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 4, 183–189. doi:10.1023/A:1009575514205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Becker, S. (1994). Couples and reproductive health: A review of couple studies. Studies in Family Planning, 27, 291–306. doi:10.2307/2138025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Greene, M. E., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2000). Absent and problematic men: Demographic accounts of male reproductive roles. Population and Development Review, 26, 81–115. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00081.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryndl Hohmann-Marriott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hohmann-Marriott, B. The Couple Context of Pregnancy and its Effects on Prenatal Care and Birth Outcomes. Matern Child Health J 13, 745–754 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0467-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0467-0

Keywords

Navigation