Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effort Levels of National Maternal and Neonatal Health Programs: 2005 Measures and Six Year Trends

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective To assess efforts by national programs in developing countries to improve maternal and neonatal health in 2005 in the context of the six-year trend. Methods A total of 14 components of effort based upon 81 questionnaire items were measured for 49–55 countries in 1999, 2002, and 2005, covering about 85% of the developing world’s population. A standard questionnaire was completed by 10–25 experts in each country, with all questionnaires analyzed centrally and results returned to each country. The 2005 round includes new items and analysis for malaria and newborn interventions. Findings An overall index of effort showed no significant improvement over the six-year period. The patterns of effort across the 14 components were quite similar in the three rounds, supporting the usefulness of the methodology while also confirming the consistency of non-improvement. Rural access to services, in essentially all countries, is very inferior to urban access. Effort scores for antenatal and neonatal care were among the highest while those for health center capacities were among the lowest. Conclusion Effort levels by maternal health programs in developing countries remain seriously deficient. Even by the standard set by the best scoring countries the ratings show only about 75% of maximum effort achieved. The overall average is just above half of maximum effort, at about 56% in all three years, whether countries are weighted equally or by their population sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A listing of questionnaire items for each component is in Appendix 1 of reference 1.

  2. See reference 1.

  3. The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is defined as the number of pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 live births per year. The two principal relationships are to abortion-related deaths and birth-related deaths. Estimates for essentially all countries are found in references below for 1990, 1995, and 2000.

  4. The MMR estimates for 1990, 1995, and 2000 used somewhat different methods, and changes for individual countries vary considerably. However the overall MMR mean value for developing countries fell from 545 in 1990 to 514 in 1995 to 455 in 2000. Weighting each country’s MMR by its population gives the lower figures of 378, 327, and 321 respectively, since China and certain other large countries have achieved somewhat lower maternal mortality.

References

  1. Ross, J. A., Campbell, O. M. R., & Bulatao, R. (2001). The maternal and neonatal programme effort index (MNPI). Tropical Medicine and International Health, 6, 787–798.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bulatao, R. A., & Ross, J. A. (2002). Rating maternal and neonatal health services in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, 721–727.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, J. A., Begala, & J. E. (2005). Measures of strength for maternal health programs in 55 developing countries: The MNPI Study. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9(1), 59–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulatao, R. A., & Ross, J. A. (2001). Dimensions of Ratings of Maternal and Neonatal Health Services: A factor analysis. Measure evaluation working paper WP-01-40. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, Carolina Population Center.

  5. Bulatao, R. A., & Ross, J. A. (2003). Which health services reduce maternal mortality? Evidence from ratings of maternal health services. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 8(8), 710–721. [Also see note no. 3].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross, J. A., & Begala, J. E. (2005). Measures of strength for maternal health programs in 55 developing countries: The MNPI Study. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9(1), 59–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The components were conceptualized in stages, as described in Ross, Campbell, and Bulatao (2001). See reference no. 1.

  8. Bollinger, L., & Sonneveldt, E. Safe motherhood model, January 2006. Available at: (http://www.constellafutures.com/software/Spectrum/SafeMoME.pdf), accessed February 13, 2007.

  9. Ross, J. A., & Mauldin, W. P. (1996). Family planning programs: Efforts and results, 1972–1994. Studies in Family Planning 27(3):137–147. Also Ross, J. A., Stover, J. (2001). The family planning program effort index: 1999 cycle. International Family Planning Perspectives, 27(3):119–229. See also Ross, J., Stover, J., & Adelaja, D. (2007). Family planning programs in 2004: New assessments in a changing environment. International Family Planning Perspectives, 33(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stover, J., & Begala, J. E. (2004). Coverage of selected services for HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and support in low and middle income countries in 2003. Washington, DC: Futures Group/POLICY Project.

  11. Listed alphabetically the top ten are Egypt, Ghana, Guatemala, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania. The bottom ten are Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Haiti, Mauritania, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Yemen, Zambia (A separate recent study in Afghanistan placed its total score as especially low, along with Pakistan and Ethiopia).

  12. The list of key neonatal interventions is taken from Darmstadt, G. L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cousens, S., Adam, T., Walker, N., & de Bernis, L. (2005). Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: How many newborn babies can we save? Lancet, 365, 977–988.

  13. WHO (2004). A strategic framework for malaria prevention and control during pregnancy in the African region. Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for Africa. AFR/MAL/04/01.

  14. WHO (2005). International travel and health. Geneva: World Health Organization, pp. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  15. AbouZahr, C., & Wardlaw, T. (2000). Maternal mortality in 1995: Estimates developed by WHO and UNICEF. New York: UNICEF. The estimates for 1990 are in WHO and UNICEF (1996) Revised 1990 estimates of maternal mortality: A new approach by WHO and UNICEF.

  16. AbouZhar, C., & Wardlaw, T. (2004). Maternal mortality in 2000: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, and UNFPA. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bulatao, R. A. (2001). Efects of maternal health services on maternal mortality: a simulation model. Available at: http://www.futuresgroup.com

  18. WHO World Health Report (2005). Geneva: World Health Organization.

  19. A recent estimate of global costs during 2006–20015 to attain the MCH objectives in the Millennium Development Goals is available in Benjamin Johns et al., “Estimated Global Resources Needed to Attain Universal Coverage of Maternal and Newborn Health Services.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization,April 2007; 85:256–263. The aggregate outlays total $39.3 to $55.7 billion depending upon the pace of scaling up.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research under the POLICY II project was funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development under Contract No. HRN-C-00-00-00006-00. It was implemented by Futures Group in collaboration with Research Triangle Institute (RTI) and the Centre for Development and Population Activities (CEDPA). We thank John Stover of the Futures Institute for helpful suggestions concerning the analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Ross.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, J.A., Adelaja, D. & Bollinger, L. Effort Levels of National Maternal and Neonatal Health Programs: 2005 Measures and Six Year Trends. Matern Child Health J 12, 586–598 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0266-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0266-4

Keywords

Navigation