Purpose: Birth and fetal death certificates classify individuals as twins or higher order multiples, but do not identify multiple gestation groups. As a result, multiple gestations are consistently excluded from maternal and child health research studies despite the surge in multiple births since the early 1980s and the health risks associated with them. A standardized methodology for states to identify multiple gestation groups is proposed to allow researchers to account for multiple gestations in analyses, improve the accuracy of the incidence of multiple gestations and further knowledge of the impact of multiple gestations on birth outcomes. Methods: Using 3 years of Massachusetts birth and fetal death certificate data from 1998 to 2000 (247,959 births and 1358 fetal deaths), we assigned matching multiple gestation group numbers to records with identical combinations of mother's first name, last name, date of birth, and month of delivery. To validate our methodology, we calculated plurality and compared it to plurality reported on the existing birth and fetal death data. Results: This method correctly identified 10,765 records out of 10,795 validated multiple gestation deliveries (99.8%). Our method identified 71 additional multiple gestation deliveries, which were not identified by the birth and fetal death files. This method resulted in only 4 false positives and 51 false negatives over 3 years. Conclusions: This algorithm provides much needed information on multiple gestation groupings, and as an additional benefit, improves the identification of multiple gestation deliveries. This method has proven easy to use, employs state-level data, and offers numerous new analytic opportunities.
References
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: Final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003;52(10).
Mathews TJ, Menaker F, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from 2001 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003;52(2).
Petterson B, Stanley F, Henderson D. Cerebral palsy in multiple births in Western Australia. Am J Med Genet 1990;37:346–51.
Pollack H, Lantz PM, Frohna JG. Maternal smoking and adverse birth outcomes among singletons and twins. Am J Public Health 2000;90:395–400.
Powers WF, Kiely JL. How to find a wombmate: Validation of an algorithm to identify twin pairs in linked birth/infant death files. Am J Epi 1994;139:535–40.
Croft ML, Read AW, de Klerk N, et al. Population based ascertainment of twins and their siblings, born in Western Australia 1980 to 1992, through the construction and validation of a maternally linked database of siblings. Twin Res 2002;5:317–23.
Salihu HM, Alexander MR, Shumpert MN, et al. Infant mortality among twins born to teenagers in the United States. Black–White disparity. J Reprod Med 2003;48:257–67.
Martin JA, Curtin MA, Saulnier ML, et al. The matched multiple birth file [CDC/NCHS web site]. Available at: URL: http://www.nber.org/mults/docs/a_Methdoc9598.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2004.
SAS Institute. Release 8.1. Copyright © 1999–2000 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Supported by Cooperative Agreement #S1887-21/21 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Associated Schools of Public Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lazar, J., Kotelchuck, M., Nannini, A. et al. Identifying Multiple Gestation Groups Using State-Level Birth and Fetal Death Certificate Data. Matern Child Health J 10, 225–228 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-005-0043-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-005-0043-1