Skip to main content
Log in

The Human Tissue Act 2004: Innovative Legislation – Fundamentally Flawed or Missed Opportunity?

  • Published:
Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In November 2004 Royal Assent was finally given to the Human Tissue Act which was passed in response to the organ retention scandals at Alder Hey hospital and other hospitals around the UK. At first glance it may appear to set many of the concerns raised in the Bristol Interim Inquiry and Alder Hey Inquiry to rest. But on closer inspection a more complex position emerges. The paper examines the extent to which it can be regarded as a groundbreaking piece of legislation clarifying a notoriously uncertain area of law or whether in the long term it will be viewed as a fundamentally flawed Act and a missed opportunity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Mchale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mchale, J. The Human Tissue Act 2004: Innovative Legislation – Fundamentally Flawed or Missed Opportunity?. Liverpool Law Rev 26, 169–188 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-005-4842-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-005-4842-7

Keywords

Navigation