Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Free Choiceness and Non-Individuation

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT.

Fresh evidence from Free Choice Items (FCIs) in French question the current perception of the class. The role of some standard distinctions found in the literature is weakened or put in a new perspective. The distinction between universal and existential is no longer an intrinsic property of FCIs. Similarly, the opposition between variation-based vs intension-based analyses is relativized. We show that the regime of free choiceness can be characterized by an abstract constraint, that we call Non-Individuation (NI), and which can be satisfied in different ways that match current distinctions. NI says that the information conveyed by a sentence containing a FCI should not be reducible to a referential situation, that is a situation in which particular individuals satisfy the sentence in the current world. The widely used resource of modal variation becomes a particular scenario of free-choiceness, not its ‘essence’. In fact, we show that under certain conditions, FCIs can occur in episodic, non-modal sentences, a fact that NI can accommodate. We also discuss more fine-grained aspects of the semantics of FCIs, such as their emotional colour. (. . .) the tripod fell spontaneously, because, though it stood on its feet so as to serve for a seat, it did not fall so as to serve for a seat. Aristotle, Physics II,6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson Alan Ross Nuel D. Belnap SuffixJr. (1975) Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. I Princeton University Press The Logic of Relevance and Necessity

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan Ross Anderson NuelD. Belnap SuffixJr. J. Michael Dunn (1992) Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity Vol. II Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Armstrong (1997) A World of States of Affairs Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas Asher Morreau Michael (1995) ’What Some Generic Sentences Mean’ G.N. Carlson F.J. Pelletier (Eds) The Generic Book Chicago University Press Chicago 300–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertocchi, Alessandra: 2000, ’Scalarity and Concession: The Case of quamvis’, manuscript, University of Bologna.

  • Patrick. Blackburn (2000) ArticleTitle’Representation, Reasoning and Relational Structures: A Hybrid Logic Manifesto’ Journal of the IGPL 8 339–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick Blackburn Marx Maartens (2002) ArticleTitle’Remarks on Gregory’s “actually” Operator’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariel. Cohen (1999) Thing Generic! The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences CSLI Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis Corblin (1997) ArticleTitle’Les indéfinis: variables et quantificateurs’ Langue Française 116 8–32

    Google Scholar 

  • William Croft (2001) Radical Construction Grammar Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Alice Davison (1980) ’Any as Universal or Existential?’ J. Auwera Particlevan der (Eds) The Semantics of Determiners. Croom Helm London 11–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, Veneeta: 1995, ’Licensing any in Non-Negative/Non-Modal Contexts’, Proceeding of SALT V 72-93.

  • Veneeta. Dayal (1998) ArticleTitle’ANY as Inherently Modal’ Linguistics and Philosophy 21 433–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul. Dekker (1998) ArticleTitle’Speaker’s Reference, Description and Information Structure Journal of Semantics 15 305–334

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Donellan Keith (1966) ArticleTitle’Reference and Definite Descriptions’ The Philosophical Review 75 281–304

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Donellan Keith (1968) ArticleTitle’Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again’ The Philosophical Review 77 203–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Donellan Keith S. (1978). ‘Speaker Reference, Descriptions, and Anaphora’. In: Cole P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9. Academic Press.

  • Regine Eckardt (1999) ArticleTitle‘Normal Objects, Normal Worlds and the Meaning of Generic Sentences’ Journal of Semantics 16 237–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner Jason (1994). “∀”-Less inWonderland? Revisiting any’. Proceedings of ESCOL’ 94. 92-103.

  • Farkas, Donka F.: 2002, ‘Varieties of Indefinites’, to appear in Proceedings of SALT XII.

  • Gilles. Fauconnier (1978) ‘Implication Reversal in a Natural Language’, In: Guenthner F. and Schmidt S S. J. Schmidt (Eds) Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Language. Reidel Dordrecht 289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles. Fauconnier (1985) Mental Spaces Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kit Fine (1985) Reasoning with Arbitrary Objects Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kit Fine (1988) ‘Semantics for Quantified Relevance Logics’, The Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 27–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kit. Fine (1995) ArticleTitle‘The Logic of Essence’ The Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 241–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Kit. Fine (2000) ArticleTitle‘Semantics for the Logic of Essence’ The Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 543–584

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, Kai: 2000, ‘Whatever’, Proceedings of SALT X 27.39.

  • Mark. Gawron Jean (2001) ‘Universal Concessive Conditionals and Alternative NPs in English’ C. Condoravdi G. RenardeldeLavalette (Eds) Logical Perspectives on Language and Information. CSLI Stanford 73–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia: 1997a, The Landscape of Polarity Items, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia: 1997b, ‘Linking Sensitivity to Limited Distribution’, Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium 139.144.

  • Anastasia. Giannakidou (1998) Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency John Benjamins Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasia. Giannakidou (1999) ArticleTitle‘Affective Dependencies’ Linguistics and Philosophy 22 367–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasia. Giannakidou (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Meaning of Free Choice’ Linguistics and Philosophy 4 659–735

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Goldberg Adele (1995) Constructions A Construction Grammar Approach to Arguments Structure. The University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Yael: 2002, Manifestations of Genericity, Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.

  • Dominic. Gregory (2001) ArticleTitle‘Completeness and Decidability Results for Some Modal Propositional Logics Containing the “actually” Operator’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 57–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin. Haspelmath (1997) Indefinite Pronouns Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Irene Heim Kratzer. Angelika (1998) Semantics in Generative Grammar Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack Hoeksema Klein. Henny (1995) ArticleTitle‘Negative Predicates and Their Arguments’ Linguistic Analysis 25 146–180

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Horn Laurence (1972) ‘On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English’ University of California Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Horn Laurence (2000) ‘Pick a Theory, not Just any Theory’ L.R. Horn Y. Kato (Eds) Negation and Polarity. Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives Oxford University Press Oxford 147–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R.: 2001, ’Any and (-)ever: Free Choice and Free Relatives’, IATL 15 (Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics), 71-111.

  • Laurence Horn Young-Suk. Lee (1995) ArticleTitle’Progovac on Polarity’ Journal of Linguistics 31 401–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Israel (1996) ArticleTitle’Polarity Sensitivity as Lexical Semantics’ Linguistics and Philosophy 19 619–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauline. Jacobson (1995) ’On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives’ E. Bach E. Jelinek A. Kratzer B. Partee (Eds) Quantification in Natural Language. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 451–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayez, Jacques and Danièle Godard: 1999, True to Fact(s), Proceedings of the 12th Amsterdam Colloquium 151–156

  • Jayez, Jacques and Lucia M. Tovena: 2002, ’Determiners and (Un)certainty’, to appear in Proceedings of SALT XII.

  • R.E. Jennings (1994) The Genealogy of Disjunction Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirit Kadmon Landman Fred (1993) ArticleTitle’Any’ Linguistics and Philosophy 16 353–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans Kamp Reyle. Uwe (1993) From Discourse to Logic Kluwer Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth. Kempson (1985) ArticleTitle’More on any: Reply to Ladusaw’ NELS 15 234–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges Kleiber Martin. Robert (1977) ArticleTitle’La quantification universelle en français’ Semantikos 2 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Klima Edward (1964) ’Negation in English’ J. Fodor J. Katz (Eds) The Structure of Language. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs 246–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1981, ’The Notional Category of Modality’, in H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds and Contexts, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 38-74.

  • Manfr Krifka (1995) ArticleTitle’The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items’ Linguistic Analysis 25 209–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul. Kripke (1977) ’Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference’ P.A. French T.E. Uehling H.K. Wettstein (Eds) Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis 6–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka Mugarza, I.: 1990, Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections, Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Chungmin. Lee (1996) ArticleTitle’Negative Polarity Items in English and Korean’ Language Sciences 18 505–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Chungmin: 1997, ’Negative Polarity and Free Choice: Where do they Come From?’ Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, 217–222.

  • Lee, Young-Suk Laurence R. Horn, 1994, ‘ Any as Indefinite plus Even’, manuscript, Yale University.

  • LeGrand, Jean Ehrenkranz: 1975, Or and Any: The Semantics and Syntax of Two Logical Operators, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • K. Lewis David (1968) ArticleTitle’Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’ The Journal of Philosophy 65 113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Lewis David (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraldi, Mirka: 2001, ‘ Free-Choice Quantification and Concession in Latin’, manuscript, University of Bologna.

  • A. Michaelis Laura Ruppenhofer. Josef (2001) Beyond Alternations. A Constructional Model of the German Applicative Pattern. CSLI Publications Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard Denis. (2001). ‘ Tout N en français versus Vsjakijn N en russe’. In: Blanco X., Buvet P. A. and Gavriilidou Z. (eds.), Détermination et formalisation, Linguisticae Investigationes Supplementa, series, pp 273–290

  • Prince Alan and Paul Smolensky. (1993). ’Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar’, manuscript, Rutgers University.

  • Alan Prince Smolensky. Paul (1997) ArticleTitle’Optimality: From Neural Networks to Universal Grammar’ Science 275 1604–1610

    Google Scholar 

  • Progovac, L.: 1988, A Binding Approach to Polarity Sensitivity, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.

  • James. Pustejovsky (1995) The Generative Lexicon MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Quer, Josep: 1998, Mood at the Interface, Ph.D. dissertation, Holland Academic Grap

  • Paul. Reed (2000) ArticleTitle’Any and its French Equivalents’ French Language Studies 10 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeff. Ross (1988) The Semantics of Media Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæø, Kjell J.: 1999, ‘ Free Choice Items in Scandinavian’, NORDSEM Research Report, University of Oslo.

  • J. Sæbø Kjell (2001) ArticleTitle’The Semantics of Scandinavian Free Choice Items’ Linguistics and Philosophy 24 737–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert. Stalnaker (1973) ’Pragmatic Presuppositions’ M. Munitz P. Unger (Eds) Semantics and Philosophy. New York University Press New York 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Stalnaker Robert (1978) ’Assertion’ P. Cole (Eds) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9. Academic Press New York 315–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovena, L.M.: 1993, Exploring an Algebraic Semantic Analysis of Negative Polarity, Ph.D. Summer Project, University of Edinburgh

  • Tovena, Lucia M.: 1996, Studies on Polarity Sensitivity, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.

  • M. Tovena Lucia (1998) The Fine Structure of Polarity Sensitivity Garland New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tovena Lucia (2001) ArticleTitle’The Phenomenon of Polarity Sensitivity: Questions and Answers’ Lingua e stile 36 131–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovena, Lucia M. and Jacques Jayez: 1997a, ‘ TheModal Arbitrariness of any’, manuscript, University of Geneva and EHESS, Paris.

  • Tovena, Lucia M. and Jacques Jayez: 1997b, ‘ Any as a Finian Quantifier’, Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, 295–300

  • Tovena, Lucia M. and Jacques Jayez: 1999a, ‘ Any: From Scalarity to Arbitrariness’, in F. Corblin, C. Dobrovie-Sorin, and J. M. Marandin (eds.), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 2, Thesus, The Hague, pp. 39–57.

  • M. Tovena Lucia Jayez. Jacques (1999) Déterminants et irréférence J. L’exempledetout’. Moeschler M.-J. Béguelin (Eds) Référence temporelle et nominale. Peter Lang Berne 235–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassios. Tzouvaras (1996) ArticleTitle’Aspects of Analytic Deduction’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 581–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank. Veltman (1996) ArticleTitle’Defaults in Update Semantics’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 221–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachou, Evangelia: 2003, ‘ Le puzzle des indéfinis en qu-’, to appear in F. Corblin and L. Kupferman (eds.), Indéfinis et prédication, PUF, Paris

  • E. Zimmerman Thomas (1992) ArticleTitle’On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs’ Natural Language Semantics 1 149–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz. Zwarts (1995) ArticleTitle’Nonveridical Contexts’ Linguistic Analysis 25 286–312

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ENS-LSH, 15 Parvis René Descartes, BP, 7000 F-69342, Lyon Cedex, France

    Jacques Jayez

  2. Université de Lille III, UFR Angellier, BP 149, F-59653, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France

    Lucia M. Tovena

Authors
  1. Jacques Jayez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucia M. Tovena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Jayez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jayez, J., Tovena, L.M. Free Choiceness and Non-Individuation. Linguist Philos 28, 1–71 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-1072-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-1072-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation