Abstract
We consider the steady Navier–Stokes equations in the punctured regions (ı) Ω = Ω 0 \ {o} (with {o} ∈ Ω 0) and (ıı) \( \varOmega ={{\mathbb{R}}^2}\backslash \left( {{{\overline{\varOmega}}_0}\cup \left\{ o \right\}} \right) \) (with \( \left\{ o \right\}\notin {{\overline{\varOmega}}_0} \)), where Ω 0 is a simple connected Lipschitz bounded domain of \( {{\mathbb{R}}^2} \). We regard o as a sink or a source in the fluid. Accordingly, we assign the flux \( \mathcal{F} \) through a small circumference surrounding o and a boundary datum a on Γ = ∂Ω 0 such that the total flux \( \mathcal{F}+\int\nolimits_{\varGamma } {\boldsymbol{a}\cdot \boldsymbol{n}} \) is zero in case (ı). We prove that if \( \left| \mathcal{F} \right|<2\pi \nu \) and \( \left| \mathcal{F} \right|+\left| {\int\nolimits_{\varGamma } {\boldsymbol{a}\cdot \boldsymbol{n}} } \right|<2\pi \nu \) in (ı) and (ıı), respectively, where ν is the kinematical viscosity, then the problem has a C ∞ solution in Ω, which behaves at o like the gradient of the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Amrouche and M.A. Rodríguez-Bellido, Stationary Stokes, Oseen and Navier–Stokes equations with singular data, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 199:597–651, 2011.
W. Borchers and K. Pileckas, Note on the flux problem for stationary Navier–Stokes equations in domains with multiply connected boundary, Acta Appl. Math., 37:21–30, 1994.
M. Dindoš and M. Mitrea, The stationary Navier–Stokes system in nonsmooth manifolds: The Poisson problem in Lipschitz and C 1 domains, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 174:1–47, 2004.
E.B. Fabes, M. Jodeit Jr., and N.M. Rivière, Potential techniques for boundary-value problems on C 1 domains, Acta Math., 141:165–186, 1978.
E.B. Fabes, C.E. Kenig, and G.C. Verchota, Boundary-value problems for the Stokes system on Lipschitz domains, Duke Math. J., 57:769–793, 1988.
R. Farwig, G.P. Galdi, and H. Sohr, A new class of weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations with nonhomogeneous data, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 8:423–444, 2005.
R. Farwig, G.P. Galdi, and H. Sohr, Very weak solutions and large uniqueness classes of stationary Navier–Stokes equations in bounded domains of \( {{\mathbb{R}}^2} \), J. Differ. Equations, 226:564–580, 2006.
R. Farwig and H. Sohr, Existence, uniqueness and regularity of stationary solutions to inhomogeneous Navier–Stokes equations in \( {{\mathbb{R}}^n} \), Czech. Math. J., 59:61–79, 2009.
G.P. Galdi, An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations. Steady State Problems, 2nd ed., Springer Monogr. Math., Springer, 2011.
G.P. Galdi, C.G. Simader, and H. Sohr, On the Stokes problem in Lipschitz domains, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 167:147–163, 1994.
G.P. Galdi, C.G. Simader, and H. Sohr, A class of solutions of stationary Stokes and Navier–Stokes equations with boundary data in W −1/q,q, Math. Ann., 331:41–74, 2005.
D. Gilbarg and H. Weinberger, Asymptotic properties of steady plane solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations with bounded Dirichlet integral, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci., IV. Ser., 5:381–404, 1978.
L.V. Kapitanskii and K. Pileckas, On spaces of solenoidal vector fields and boundary-value problems for the Navier–Stokes equations in domains with noncompact boundaries, Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova, 159:5–36, 1983. English transl.: Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 159:3–34, 1984.
H. Kim and H. Kozono, A removable isolated singularity theorem for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations, J. Differ. Equations, 220:68–84, 2006.
M.V. Korobkov, K. Pileckas, and R. Russo, On the flux problem in the theory of steady Navier–Stokes equations with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 207:185–213, 2013.
O.A. Ladyzhenskaya, The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow, Gordon and Breach, 1969.
J. Leray, Étude de diverses équations intégrales non linéaire et de quelques problèmes que pose l’hydrodynamique, J. Math. Pures Appl., 12:1–82, 1933.
E. Marušic̀ Paloka, Solvability of the Navier–Stokes system with L 2 boundary data, Appl. Math. Optim., 41:365–375, 2000.
H. Miura and T.-P. Tsai, Point singularities of 3D stationary Navier–Stokes flows, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 14:33–41, 2012.
A. Russo, A note on the two-dimensional steady-state Navier–Stokes problem, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 11:407–414, 2009.
A. Russo, On the existence of D-solutions of the steady-state Navier–Stokes equations in plane exterior domains, 2011, arXiv:math/1101.1243.
A. Russo and A. Tartaglione, On the Oseen and Navier–Stokes systems with a slip boundary condition, Appl. Math. Lett., 22:674–678, 2009.
A. Russo and A. Tartaglione, An existence theorem for the steady Navier–Stokes problem in higher dimensions, Tokyo J. Math., 34:525–533, 2011.
A. Russo and A. Tartaglione, On the Navier problem for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations, J. Differ. Equations, 251:2387–2408, 2011.
A. Russo and A. Tartaglione, On the Stokes problem with data in L 1, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 64(4):1327–1336, 2013.
R. Russo and A. Tartaglione, On the Robin problem for the Stokes and the Navier–Stokes systems, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 16:701–716, 2006.
V.L. Shapiro, Isolated singularities for solutions of the nonlinear stationary Navier–Stokes equations, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 187:335–363, 1974.
V.L. Shapiro, A counterexample in the theory of planar viscous incompressible flow, J. Differ. Equations, 22:164–179, 1976.
H. Sohr, The Navier–Stokes Equations: An Elementary Functional Analytic Approach, Birkhäuser, 2001.
V. Šveràk, On Landau’s solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations, J. Math. Sci., New York, 179:208–228, 2011.
A. Tartaglione, On the Stokes problem with slip boundary conditions, Commun. Appl. Ind. Math., 1:186–205, 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russo, A., Tartaglione, A. On the existence of singular solutions of the stationary Navier–Stokes problem. Lith Math J 53, 423–437 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10986-013-9219-3
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10986-013-9219-3