Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disentangling the effects of habitat, connectivity and interspecific competition in the range expansion of exotic and native ungulates

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Wild medium-sized ungulate populations are recovering in many countries of the Northern Hemisphere due to abandonment of rural areas but also due to the translocation of native and exotic ungulates for game hunting.

Objectives

To assess the role of landscape connectivity, habitat suitability and interspecific interactions driving the simultaneous range expansion of two wild ungulates, one native (Iberian ibex, Capra pyrenaica) and one exotic species (Barbary sheep, Ammotragus lervia), in southeastern Spain.

Methods

We reconstructed the expansion process of the Iberian ibex and the Barbary sheep in southeastern Spain for the period 1975–2009 by means of Local Ecological Knowledge and tested the role of habitat suitability, landscape connectivity and interspecific competition during the expansion process by means of GLMM. Habitat suitability was assessed by means of ecological niche modeling and landscape connectivity was represented by competing resistance surface dispersal models.

Results

Our results show that at the landscape scale both species are ecologically very similar, although the Iberian ibex is more specialized in less transformed landscapes. Landscape connectivity was the main driver of the colonization process, followed by habitat suitability. From a connectivity point of view, both species showed a coarse perception of the landscape, recognizing three main use types: natural, agricultural and human. Major linear infrastructures do not affect the colonization process. Our colonization models also suggest a negative interaction of the Iberian ibex on the Barbary sheep.

Conclusions

The exotic Barbary sheep and the native Iberian ibex are two ungulate species very similar ecologically whose simultaneous expansion process in southeastern Spain are driven by landscape connectivity followed by habitat suitability. In addition, the Iberian ibex affects negatively the colonization ability of the Barbary sheep. Overall, our work deepens our understanding on two pressing issues simultaneously: (i) controls of the range expansion of ungulates at the landscape scale and (ii) how a native and an introduced species interact during their expansion process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo P, Cassinello J (2009) Biology, ecology and status of Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica: a critical review and research prospectus. Mamm Rev 39:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo P, Cassinello J, Hortal J, Gortazar C (2007) Invasive exotic aoudad (Ammotragus lervia) as a major threat to native Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica): a habitat suitability model approach. Divers Distrib 13:587–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo P, Delibes-Mateos M, Escudero A, Vicente J, Marco J, Gortazar C (2005) Environmental constraints in the colonization sequence of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus, 1758) across the Iberian Mountains, Spain. J Biogeogr 32:1671–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anadón JD, Giménez A, Ballestar R, Perez I (2009) Evaluation of local ecological knowledge as a method for collecting extensive animal abundance data. Conserv Biol 23:617–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2015) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1(13):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) _lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4_. R package version 1.1-7

  • Blázquez M, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Botella F, Carrete M, Eguia S (2009) Spatio-temporal segregation of facultative avian scavengers at ungulate carcasses. Acta Oecol 35:645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrete M, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Calvo JF, Lande R (2005) Demography and habitat availability in territorial occupancy of two coexisting species. Oikos 108:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassinello J (1998) Ammotragus lervia: a review on systematics, biology, ecology and distribution. Ann Zool Fenn 35:149–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassinello J, Acevedo P, Hortal J (2006) Prospects for population expansion of the exotic aoudad (Ammotragus lervia; Bovidae) in the Iberian Peninsula: clues from habitat suitability modelling. Divers Distrib 12:666–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheeson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A, Wagner JR (2003) Who Knows? On the importance of identifying “experts” when researching local ecological knwoledge. Hum Ecol 31:463–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Marco M, Biotani L, Mallon D, Hoffmann M, Iacucci A, Meijaard E, Visconti P, Schipper J, Rondinini C (2014) A retrospective evaluation of the global decline of carnivores and ungulates. Conserv Biol 28:1109–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2007) Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct Ecol 21:1003–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Candela M, Leon-Vizcaino L, Cubero-Pablo MJ (2004) Population effects of sarcoptic mange in Barbary sheep (Ammotragus lervia) from Sierra Espuña Regional Park, Spain. J Wildl Dis 40:456–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LA (1961) Snowball sampling. Ann Math Stat 32:148–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Collingham YZ, Thomas CD, Blakeley DS, Fox R, Moss D, Huntley B (2001) Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. Ecol Lett 4:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human KG, Gordon DM (1996) Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia 105:405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington HP (1998) Observations on the utility of semi directive interviewing for documenting traditional ecological knowledge. Arctic 51:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissling WD, Dormann CF, Groeneveld J, Hickler T, Kühn I, McInerny GJ, Montoya JM, Römermann C, Schiffers K, Schurr FM, Singer A (2012) Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents. J Biogeogr 39:2163–2178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronfeld-Schor N, Dayan T (2003) Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34(153):153S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Morgia V, Malenotti E, Badino G, Bona F (2011) Where do we go from here? Dispersal simulations shed light on the role of landscape structure in determining animal redistribution after reintroduction. Landscape Ecol 26:969–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro ML, Pereira HM (2012) Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems 15:900–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez MA, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA (2010) Population, community and ecosystem effects of exotic herbivores: a growing global concern. Biol Invasions 12:297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Soberón J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martínez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, Araújo MB (2011) Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruokolainen L, Hanski I (2016) Stable coexistence of ecologically identical species: conspecific aggregation via reproductive interference. J Anim Ecol 85:638–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sáez-Royuela C, Tellería JL (1986) The increased population of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mamm Rev 16:97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez MA (1998) Plan de conservación de la cabra montés en la Región de Murcia. Asesoría de Estudios Cinegéticos y Ambientales. Dirección General del Medio Natural. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Agricultura y Agua de Murcia, Murcia

    Google Scholar 

  • Soberón J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodivers Inf 2:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear D, Chown SL (2009) The extent and impacts of ungulate translocations: South Africa in a global context. Biol Conserv 142:353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Brotons L, Araújo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions. Ecography 27:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisz MS, Pottier J, Kissling WD, Pellissier L, Lenoir J, Damgaard CF, Dormann CF, Forchhammer MC, Grytnes JA, Guisan A, Heikkinen RK (2013) The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol rev 88:15–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the collaboration of the shepherds who kindly answered our questions. Sergio Eguía, Eugenio Noguera, Francisco Botella, Andrés Giménez and Roberto Pascual for their support and collaboration. This work was partially funded by Projects CGL2012-40013-C02-01/02, CGL2015-66966-C2-1-2-R, MINECO/FEDER, EU. To the memory of Miguel Angel Sánchez, a pioneer in the study of wild ungulates in SE Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Anadón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anadón, J.D., Pérez-García, J.M., Pérez, I. et al. Disentangling the effects of habitat, connectivity and interspecific competition in the range expansion of exotic and native ungulates. Landscape Ecol 33, 597–608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0622-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0622-3

Keywords

Navigation