Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Occupancy pattern of a long-horned beetle in a variegated forest landscape: linkages between tree quality and forest cover across spatial scales

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Interactions between landscape-scale processes and fine-grained habitat heterogeneity are usually invoked to explain species occupancy in fragmented landscapes. In variegated landscapes, however, organisms face continuous variation in micro-habitat features, which makes necessary to consider ecologically meaningful estimates of habitat quality at different spatial scales.

Objectives

We evaluated the spatial scales at which forest cover and tree quality make the greatest contribution to the occupancy of the long-horned beetle Microplophorus magellanicus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in a variegated forest landscape.

Methods

We used averaged data of tree quality (as derived from remote sensing estimates of the decay stage of single trees) and spatially independent pheromone-baited traps to model the occurrence probability as a function of multiple cross-scale combinations between forest cover and tree quality (with scales ranging between 50 and 400 m).

Results

Model support and performance increased monotonically with the increasing scale at which tree quality was measured. Forest cover was not significant, and did not exhibit scale-specific effects on the occurrence probability of M. magellanicus. The interactive effect between tree quality and forest cover was stronger than the independent (additive) effects of tree quality and particularly forest cover. Significant interactions included tree quality measured at spatial scales ≥200 m, but cross-scale interactions occurred only in four of the seven best-supported models.

Conclusions

M. magellanicus respond to the high-quality trees available in the landscape rather than to the amount of forest per se. Conservation of viable metapopulations of M. magellanicus should consider the quality of trees at spatial scales >200 m.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriaens D, Jacquemyn H, Honnay O, Hermy M (2009) Conservation of remnant populations of Colchicum autumnale: the relative importance of local habitat quality and habitat fragmentation. Acta Oecol 35:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artigas J (1994) Entomología Económica: Insectos de interés agrícola, forestal, médico y veterinario (nativos, introducidos y susceptibles de ser introducidos). Ediciones Universidad de Concepción. 2 volúmenes

  • Barriga J, Curkovic T, Fichet T, Henríquez J, Macaya J (1993) Nuevos antecedentes de coleópteros xilófagos y plantas hospederas en Chile, con una ecopilación de citas previas. Rev Chile Entomol 20:65–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger Y, Sirois L, Hebert C (2010) Distribution of saproxylic beetles in a recently burned landscape of the northern boreal forest of Quebec. For Ecol Manage 260:1114–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (2006) Scale for resource selection functions. Divers Distrib 12:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse J, Schröder B, Assmann T (2007) Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle—a case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biol Conserv 137:372–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerda M (1986) Lista sistemática de los cerambícidos chilenos (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Rev Chile Entomol 14:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerda L, Angulo A (2002) Insectos asociados a bosques del centro sur de Chile. En: Baldini A. y Pancel, L. 2002. Agentes de Daño en el Bosque nativo. Editorial Universitaria, pp 201–268

  • Cobb TP, Morissette JL, Jacobs JM, Koivula MJ, Spence JR, Langor DW (2011) Effects of post fire salvage logging on deadwood-associated beetles. Conserv Biol 25:94–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML (1985) Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, Debinski D, Danielson B (2007) Local and landscape effects on the butterfly community in fragmented Midwest USA prairie habitats. Landscape Ecol 22:1341–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doligez B, Berthouly A, Doligez D, Tanner M, Saladin V, Bonfils D, Richner H (2008) Spatial scale of local breeding habitat quality and adjustment of breeding decisions. Ecology 89:1436–1444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drielsma M, Ferrier S (2009) Rapid evaluation of metapopulation persistence in highly variegated landscapes. Biol Conserv 142:529–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgueta M (2000) Coleoptera de Chile. In: Martín-Piera F, Morrone JJ, y Melic A (eds) Hacia un Proyecto CYTED para el Inventario y Estimación de la Diversidad Entomológica en Iberoamérica: Monografías Tercer Milenio vol. 1. SEA, Zaragoza, pp 145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL Jr (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb H, Hjalten J, Ball JP, Atlegrim O, Pettersson RB, Hilszczanski J, Johansson T, Danell K (2006) Effects of landscape composition and substrate availability on saproxylic beetles in boreal forests: a study using experimental logs for monitoring assemblages. Ecography 29:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giganti H, Dapoto G (1990) Coleoptera of the native forests in the Department of Aluminé (Neuquén-Argentina). Bosque 11:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham EE, Mitchell RF, Reagel PF (2010) Treating panel traps with a fluoropolymer enhances their efficiency in capturing cerambycid beetles. J Econ Entomol 103:641–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffen BD, Drake JM (2008) Effects of habitat quality and size on extinction in experimental populations. Proc R Soc B 275:2251–2256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grove SJ (2002) Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML (1997) The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildl Soc Bull 25:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley K, Hough-Goldstein J, Hanks LM, Millar JG, D’amico V (2015) Species richness and phenology of cerambycid beetles in urban forest fragments of northern Delaware. Ann Entomol Soc Am 108(3):251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (2009) Incorporating the spatial configuration of the habitat into ecology and evolutionary biology. In: Ecology Spatial (ed) Cantrell S, Cosner C, Shigui Ruan S. Chapman and Hall/CRC New York, NewYork, pp 167–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisswolf A, Reichmann S, Poethke HJ, Schrader B, Obermaier E (2009) Habitat quality matters for the distribution of an endangered leaf beetle and its egg parasitoid in a fragmented landscape. J Insect Conserv 13:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JD, Bert DG, Fahrig L (2004) Determining the spatial scale of species’ response to habitat. Bioscience 54:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JD, Fahrig L, Cappuccino N (2005) Body size affects the spatial scale of habitat-beetle interactions. Oikos 110:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutto RL (1985) Habitat selection by nonbreeding, migratory land birds. In: Cody ML (ed) Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 455–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J, Spence JR, Langor DW (2007) Influence of forest succession and dead wood qualities on boreal saproxylic beetles. Agric For Entomol 9:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen RM, Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Birkemoe T (2015) Scale-specific responses of saproxylic beetles: combining dead wood surveys with data from satellite imagery. J Insect Conserv 19:1053–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Ranius T, Ekvall H, Bostedt G, Dahlberg A, Ehnström B, Nordén B, Stokland JN (2006) Cost-effectiveness of silvicultural measures to increase substrate availability for redlisted wood-living organisms in Norway spruce forests. Biol Conserv 127:443–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MD (2007) Measuring habitat quality: a review. Condor 109:489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kéry M, Schaub M (2011) Bayesian population analysis using winbugs—a hierarchical perspective. Academic Press, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristan WB III (2006) Sources and expectations for hierarchical structure in bird-habitat associations. Condor 108:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen M, Peuhu E, Varkonyi G, Siitonen J (2008) Effects of habitat quality and landscape structure on saproxylic species dwelling in boreal spruce-swamp forests. Oikos 117:1098–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2007) Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends Ecol Evol 22:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi F, Cocozza C, Lasserre B, Tognetti R, Marchetti M (2011) Dendrochronological assessment of the time since death of dead wood in an old growth Magellan’s beech forest, Navarino Island (Chile). Austral Ecol 36:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason DC, Anderson GQA, Bradbury RB, Cobby DM, Davenport IJ, Vandepoll M, Wilson JD (2003) Measurement of habitat predictor variables for organism-habitat models using remote sensing and image segmentation. Int J Remote Sens 24:2515–2532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayor SJ, Schneider DC, Schaefer JA, Mahoney SP (2009) Habitat selection at multiple scales. Ecoscience 16:238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh RL, Katinic PJ, Allison JD (2001) Comparative efficacy of five types of trap for woodborers in the Cerambycidae, Buprestidae and Siricidae. Agric For Entomol 3:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre S, Barrett GW (1992) Habitat variegation, an alternative to fragmentation. Conserv Biol 6(1):146–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merzlyak MN, Gitelson AA, Chivkunova OB, Rakitin VYU (1999) Non-destructive optical detection of pigment changes during leaf senescence and fruit ripening. Physiol Plant 106:135–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millar JG, Hanks LM, Moreira JA, Barbour JD, Lacey ES (2009) Pheromone chemistry of cerambycid beetles. In: Nakamuta K, Millar JG (eds) Chemical ecology of wood-boring insects. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, pp 52–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison ML, Marcot BG, Mannan RW (2006) Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications, 3rd edn. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti A (2013) Targeting habitat management in fragmented landscapes: a case study with forest vertebrates. Biodivers Conserv 22:187–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti A, Amori G, Boitani L (2010) The role of habitat quality in fragmented landscapes: a conceptual overview and prospectus for future research. Oecologia 163:535–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti a, Sozio G, Boccacci F, Ranchelli E, Cecere JG, Battisti C, Boitani L (2012) Effect of habitat amount, configuration and quality in fragmented landscapes. Acta Oecol 45:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, Johnson AR, King AW (1989) A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecol 3:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda V, Chazarreta L (2014) Home range and habitat use by Magellanic woodpeckers in an old-growth forest of Patagonia. Can J For Res 44:1265–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Økland B, Bakke A, Hagvar S (1996) What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiver Conserv 5:75–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters DPC, Peilke RA Sr, Bestelmeyer BT, Allen CD, Munson-McGee S, Havstad KM (2004) Cross scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15130–15135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano E (1977) Fitogeografía de Fuego-Patagonia chilena I.- Comunidades vegetales entre las latitudes 52° y 56°S. 8:121–250. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia (Chile) 8:121–250

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Russo D, Cistrone L, Garonna AP (2011) Habitat selection by the highly endangered long-horned beetle Rosalia alpina in southern Europe: a multiple spatial scale assessment. J Insect Conserv 15:685–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Germain M, Buddle CM, Drapeau P (2006) Sampling saproxylic Coleoptera: scale issues and the importance of behavior. Environ Entomol 35:478–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P (2011) Response of saprophagous wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to severe habitat loss due to logging in an aspen-dominated boreal landscape. Landscape Ecol 26:573–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin Iii FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770–1774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos MJ, Greenberg JA, Ustin SL (2010) Using hyperspectral remote sensing to detect and quantify southeastern pine senescence effects in Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) habitat. Remote Sens Environ 114:1242–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiegg K (2000) Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity. Écoscience 7:290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooley RL, Branch LC (2007) Spatial heterogeneity in habitat quality and cross-scale interactions in metapopulations. Ecosystems 10:846–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen J (2012) Microhabitats. In: Stokland J, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG (eds) Biodiversity in dead wood. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, pp 151–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Similä M, Kouki J, Martikainen P, Uotila A (2002) Conservation of beetles in boreal pine forests: effects of forest age and naturalness on species assemblages. Biol Conserv 106:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto GE, Perez-Hernández CG, Hahn IJ, Rodewald AD, Vergara PM (2016) Tree senescence as a direct measure of habitat quality: linking red-edge vegetation indices to space use by magellanic woodpeckers. Remote Sens Environ (in press)

  • Soto GE, Vergara PM, Lizama ME, Celis C, Rozzi R, Duron Q, Hahn IJ, Jiménez JE (2012) Do Beavers improve the habitat quality for Magellanic woodpeckers? Bosque 33:271–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto GE, Vergara PM, Perez-Hernández CG (2015) Home-range scale’s attributes limiting the habitat selection pattern on magellanic woodpecker. In: 100th ESA Annual Meeting, Baltimore, USA, 9–14 Aug 2015

  • Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Gustafsson L, Kouki J (2014) Spatial and temporal scales relevant for conservation of dead-wood associated species: current status and perspectives. Biodivers Conserv 23:513–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (2000) Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorn S, Bässler C, Gottschalk T, Hothorn T, Bussler H, Raffa K, Müller J (2014) New insights into the consequences of post-windthrow salvage logging revealed by functional structure of saproxylic beetles assemblages. PLoS One 9(7):e101757. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101757

  • Updike T, Comp C (2010) Radiometric use of Worldview-2 imagery, DigitalGlobe. Technical Note. DigitalGlobe®, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom J, Schotman A, Opdam P, Metz JAJ (1991) European Nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara PM, Armesto JJ (2009) Responses of Chilean forest birds to anthropogenic habitat fragmentation across spatial scales. Landscape Ecol 24:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara PM, Saura S, Pérez-Hernández C, Soto GE (2015) Hierarchical spatial decisions in fragmented landscapes: modeling the foraging movements of woodpeckers. Ecol Model 300:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara PM, Schlatter RP (2004) Magellanic woodpecker (Campephilus magellanicus) abundance and foraging in Tierra del Fuego, Chile. J Ornithol 145:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara PM, Soto GE, Moreira-Arce D, Rodewald AD, Meneses LO, Perez-Hernandez CG (2016) Foraging behaviour in magellanic woodpeckers is consistent with a multi-scale assessment of tree quality. PLoS One 11(7):e0159096

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waser LT, Küchler M, Jütte K, Stampfer T (2014) Evaluating the potential of WorldView-2 data to classify tree species and different levels of ash mortality. Remote Sens 6:4515–4545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein W, Schmid B (1999) Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers. J Appl Ecol 36:363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Tang J, Mustard J (2014) Beyond leaf color: comparing camera-based phenological metrics with leaf biochemical, biophysical, and spectral properties throughout the growing season of a temperate deciduous forest. J Geophys Res 119:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuñiga-Reinoso A (2013) Review of the Longhorns (Coleoptera: cerambycidae) from Magellanes region: illustrated checklist. Anales Instituto Patagonia (Chile) 41:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by FONDECYT Grant 1131133. GES acknowledges Wesley Hochachka from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Mario Nazar for their technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo M. Vergara.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vergara, P.M., Meneses, L.O., Grez, A.A. et al. Occupancy pattern of a long-horned beetle in a variegated forest landscape: linkages between tree quality and forest cover across spatial scales. Landscape Ecol 32, 279–293 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0443-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0443-1

Keywords

Navigation