Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The relative influence of forest loss and fragmentation on insectivorous bats: does the type of matrix matter?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Disentangling the relative effects of forest loss versus fragmentation on species distribution and abundance is crucial for adopting efficient biodiversity conservation actions, which could change with the nature of the landscape matrix.

Objectives

We tested the moderating effect of landscape matrix on insectivorous bats response to forest loss and fragmentation.

Methods

We conducted acoustic surveys at forest patches surrounded by either an agricultural-dominated matrix or a pine-dominated matrix. We related bat activity to forest amount and the number of forest patches at multiple spatial scales, and compared their effects between landscape matrices.

Results

Bat activity was associated with both predictors, however their effects varied with the matrix type. In agricultural landscapes, as the amount of forest increased, the activity of Histiotus montanus, Lasiurus cinereus and Tadarida brasiliensis increased, while activity of Myotis chiloensis decreased. Similarly, as fragmentation increased, the activity of Lasiurus varius and M. chiloensis increased, while activity of H. montanus decreased. In production-forest landscapes, only H. montanus decreased its activity with increasing forest amount. In contrast, activity of L. cinereus, M. chiloensis and T. brasiliensis increased with increasing fragmentation. Forest amount was a stronger predictor for agricultural landscapes than for production-forest landscapes, suggesting that low contrast matrices can mitigate the effects of forest loss.

Conclusions

Fragmented landscapes with native forest patches surrounded by a low contrast matrix may support a higher activity of insectivorous bats. Management efforts in fragmented landscapes should aim to decrease the patch-matrix contrast, which will mitigate the effects of forest loss on bats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum KA, Haynes KJ, Dillemuth FP, Cronin JT (2004) The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones. Ecology 85(10):2671–2676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkin KM, Parsons S (2010a) Plantation forests are used by the lesser short-tailed bat, Mystacina tuberculata rhyacobia. N Z J Zool 37(1):13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkin KM, Parsons S (2010b) The importance of exotic plantation forest for the New Zealand long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus). N Z J Zool 37(1):35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkin KM, Parsons S (2011) Home range and habitat selection by a threatened bat in exotic plantation forest. For Ecol Manag 262(5):845–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham R, Grindal S (1997) The influence of structural clutter on activity patterns of insectivorous bats. Can J Zool 75(1):131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo A, Perelman S, Robbins CS (2010) Landscape-level impact of tropical forest loss and fragmentation on bird occurrence in eastern Guatemala. Ecol Model 221(3):512–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaverri G, Quirós OE, Kunz TH (2007) Ecological correlates of range size in the tent-making bat Artibeus watsoni. J Mammal 88(2):477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crome FHJ, Richards GC (1988) Bats and gaps: microchiropteran community structure in a queensland rain forest. Ecology 69:1960–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128(2):231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debinski DM (2006) Forest fragmentation and matrix effects: the matrix does matter. J Biogeogr 33(10):1791–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverria C, Coomes D, Salas J, Rey-Benayas JM, Lara A, Newton A (2006) Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean temperate forests. Biol Conserv 130(4):481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore L, Miller D, Vilella F (2005) Foraging area size and habitat use by red bats (Lasiurus borealis) in an intensively managed pine landscape in Mississippi. Am Midl Nat 153(2):405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson JL, West SD (2002) The influence of regional climate and nightly weather conditions on activity patterns of insectivorous bats. Acta Chiropt 4(1):17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estades CF, Grez AA, Simonetti JA (2012) Biodiversity in Monterrey pine plantations. In: Simonetti JA, Grez AA, Estades CF (eds) Biodiversity conservation in agroforestry landscapes: challenges and opportunities. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, pp 77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier K, Fahrig L (2011) Positive effects of forest fragmentation, independent of forest amount, on bat abundance in eastern Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecol 26(6):865–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81(1):117–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreras P (2001) Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx. Biol Conserv 100(1):125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4(2):80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaz J, Yáñez J (2006) Los Murciélagos de Chile: Guía para su reconocimiento. Ediciones del Centro de Ecología Aplicada, Santiago

  • Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Bierregaards RO Jr, Malcolm JR, Stouffer PC, Vasconcelos HL, Laurance WF, Zimmerman B, Tocher M, Borges S (1999) Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biol Conserv 91(2):223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorresen PM, Willig MR (2004) Landscape responses of bats to habitat fragmentation in Atlantic forest of Paraguay. J Mammal 85(4):688–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindal S, Brigham R (1999) Impacts of forest harvesting on habitat use by foraging insectivorous bats at different spatial scales. Ecoscience 6:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (2002) A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol Appl 12(2):321–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CA, Medina A, Sánchez DM, Vílchez S, Hernández B, Saenz JC, Maes JM, Casanoves F, Sinclair FL (2006) Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree cover in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Appl 16(5):1986–1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson L, Broders H (2008) Movements and resource selection of the northern long-eared myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) in a forest-agriculture landscape. J Mammal 89(4):952–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JE, Hungate BA, Matulich KL, Gonzalez A, Duffy JE, Gamfeldt L, O’Connor MI (2012) A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486(7401):105–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klingbeil BT, Willig MR (2009) Guild-specific responses of bats to landscape composition and configuration in fragmented Amazonian rainforest. J Appl Ecol 46(1):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniowski AB, Gehrt SD (2014) Home range and habitat selection of the Indiana bat in an agricultural landscape. J Wildl Manag 78(3):503–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzi AJ, Morrison ML (2003) Temporal patterns of bat activity in Southern Arizona. J Wildl Manag 67:52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer JA, Malanson GP, Franklin SB (2006) Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15(1):8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacki M, Hayes J, Kurta A (eds) (2007) Bats in forests: conservation and management. JHU Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Law BS, Anderson J, Chidel M (1999) Bat communities in a fragmented forest landscape on the south-west slopes of New South Wales, Australia. Biol Conserv 88(3):333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (2004) Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests—a review. Biol Conserv 119(2):151–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Cunningham R, Pope M (1999) A large-scale “experiment” to examine the effects of landscape context and habitat fragmentation on mammals. Biol Conserv 88(3):387–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, McComb WC (1995) Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon Coast Range. Ecol Monogr 65(3):235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris AD, Miller DA, Kalcounis-Rueppell MC (2010) Use of forest edges by bats in a managed pine forest landscape. J Wildl Manag 74(1):26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner M (1990) Applied linear statistical models, 3rd edn. Irwin, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg U, Rayner J (1987) Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 316:335–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nupp TE, Swihart RK (2000) Landscape-level correlates of small-mammal assemblages in forest fragments of farmland. J Mammal 81(2):512–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell MJO, Corben CHC, Gannon WLG (2000) Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus). Acta Chiropt 2(2):185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevedello JA, Vieira MV (2009) Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodivers Conserv 19(5):1205–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye JD (1971) Bats and fog. Nature 229:572–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn G, Keough M (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Renjifo LM (2001) Effect of natural and anthropogenic landscape matrices on the abundance of subandean bird species. Ecol Appl 11(1):14–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158(1):87–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie LE, Betts MG, Forbes G, Vernes K (2009) Effects of landscape composition and configuration on northern flying squirrels in a forest mosaic. For Ecol Manag 257(9):1920–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-San Pedro A, Simonetti JA (2013a) Foraging activity by bats in a fragmented landscape dominated by exotic pine plantations in central Chile. Acta Chiropt 15(2):393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-San Pedro A, Simonetti JA (2013b) Acoustic identification of four species of bats (Order Chiroptera) in central Chile. Bioacoustics 22(2):165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saïd S, Gaillard JM, Widmer O, Débias F, Bourgoin G, Delorme D, Roux C (2009) What shapes intra-specific variation in home range size? A case study of female roe deer. Oikos 118(9):1299–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti JA, Grez AA, Estades CF (2013) Providing habitat for native mammals through understory enhancement in forestry plantations. Conserv Biol 27(5):1117–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sleep D, Brigham R (2003) An experimental test of clutter tolerance in bats. J Mammal 84(1):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AC, Koper N, Francis CM, Fahrig L (2009) Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation. Landscape Ecol 24(10):1271–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DW, Ritzi CM, Duchamp JE, Whitaker JO (2005) Foraging habitat of the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) at an urban-rural interface. J Mammal 86(4):713–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzcinski MK, Fahrig L, Merriam G (1999) Independent effects of forest cover and fragmentation on the distribution of forest breeding birds. Ecol Appl 9(2):586–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara P, Simonetti J (2003) Forest fragmentation and rhynocriptid nest predation in central Chile. Acta Oecol 24(5):285–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villard M-A, Trzcinski MK, Merriam G (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv Biol 13(4):774–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh A, Barclay R, McCracken G (2004) Designing bat activity surveys for inventory and monitoring studies at local and regional scales. In: Brighamm R, Kalko E, Jones G, Parsons S, Limpens HJGA (eds) Bat echolocation research: tools, techniques and analysis. Bat Conservation International, Austin, pp 157–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters BL, Ritzi CM, Sparks DW, Whitaker JO Jr (2007) Foraging behavior of eastern red bats (Lasiurus borealis) at an urban-rural interface. Am Midl Nat 157(2):365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA (2002) The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv Biol 16(5):1192–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to L.F. Aguirre (PCMB) for the loan of bat detectors. Special thanks to R. Zúñiga and Y. Cerda for their invaluable help with the fieldwork and D. Rojas for his help with statistical analysis. We are also grateful to the Coordinating Editor and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that improved a previous version of the manuscript. This research has been partially supported by FONDECYT 1095046 and Programa Domeyko-Biodiversidad (IT3), Universidad de Chile. A. Rodríguez-San Pedro was supported by a doctoral fellowship from Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT), Chile.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile

    Annia Rodríguez-San Pedro & Javier A. Simonetti

Authors
  1. Annia Rodríguez-San Pedro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Javier A. Simonetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annia Rodríguez-San Pedro.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez-San Pedro, A., Simonetti, J.A. The relative influence of forest loss and fragmentation on insectivorous bats: does the type of matrix matter?. Landscape Ecol 30, 1561–1572 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0213-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0213-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation