Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying the speed, growth modes, and landscape pattern changes of urbanization: a hierarchical patch dynamics approach

  • Research article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization transforms landscape structure and profoundly affects biodiversity and ecological processes. To understand and solve these ecological problems, at least three aspects of spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization need to be quantified: the speed, urban growth modes, and resultant changes in landscape pattern. In this study, we quantified these spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization in the central Yangtze River Delta region, China from 1979 to 2008, based on a hierarchical patch dynamics framework that guided the research design and the analysis with landscape metrics. Our results show that the urbanized area in the study region increased exponentially during the 30 years at the county, prefectural, and regional levels, with increasing speed down the urban hierarchy. Three growth modes—infilling, edge-expanding, and leapfrogging—operated concurrently and their relative dominance shifted over time. As urbanization progressed, patch density and edge density generally increased, and the connectivity of urban patches in terms of the average nearest neighbor distance also increased. While landscape-level structural complexity also tended to increase, the shape of individual patches became increasingly regular. Our results suggest that whether urban landscapes are becoming more homogenous or heterogeneous may be dependent on scale in time and space as well as landscape metrics used. The speed, growth modes, and landscape pattern are related to each other in complicated fashions. This complex relationship can be better understood by conceptualizing urbanization not simply as a dichotomous diffusion-coalescence switching process, but as a spiraling process of shifting dominance among multiple growth modes: the wax and wane of infilling, edge-expansion, and leapfrog across the landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology: integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:769–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berling-Wolff S, Wu J (2004) Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosyst 7:215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom DE (2011) 7 Billion and counting. Science 333:562–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld H (1954) The tidal wave of metropolitan expansion. J Am Inst Plan 20:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce RR (1966) The edge of the Metropolis: the wave theory analog approach. Br Columbia Geogr Ser 7:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgi M, Hersperger AM, Schneeberger N (2004) Driving forces of landscape change—current and new directions. Landscape Ecol 19:857–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyantuyev A, Gries C, Wu J (2010) Multiscale analysis of the urbanization pattern of the Phoenix metropolitan landscape of USA: time, space and thematic resolution. Landscape Urban Plan 94:206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KW (2010) Fundamentals of China’s urbanization and policy. China Rev 10:63–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Chander G, Markham BL, Helder DL (2009) Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens Environ 113:893–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XL, Zhao HM, Li PX, Yin ZY (2006) Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes. Remote Sens Environ 104:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva PM, Berg MP, Serrano ARM, Dubs F, Sousa JP (2012) Environmental factors at different spatial scales governing soil fauna community patterns in fragmented forests. Landscape Ecol 27:1337–1349

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel C, Herold M, Hemphill JJ, Clarke KC (2005a) Spatio-temporal dynamics in California’s Central Valley: empirical links to urban theory. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19:175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel C, Oguz H, Hemphill JJ, Clarke KC, Gazulis N (2005b) Diffusion and coalescence of the Houston Metropolitan Area: evidence supporting a new urban theory. Environ Plann B 32:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm N, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herold M, Scepan J, Clarke KC (2002) The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environ Plan A 34(8):1443–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover EM, Vernon R (1959) Anatomy of a metropolis: the changing distribution of people and jobs within the New York metropolitan region. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenerette GD, Potere D (2010) Global analysis and simulation of land-use change associated with urbanization. Landscape Ecol 25:657–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenerette GD, Wu J (2001) Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona-Phoenix region, USA. Landscape Ecol 16:611–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JX, Song CH, Cao L, Zhu FG, Meng XL, Wu JG (2011) Impacts of landscape structure on surface urban heat islands: a case study of Shanghai, China. Remote Sens Environ 115:3249–3263

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JX, Li C, Zhu FG, Song CH, Wu JG (2013) Spatiotemporal pattern of urbanization in Shanghai, China between 1989 and 2005. Landscape Ecol 28: doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9901-1

  • Liu JY, Zhan JY, Deng XZ (2005) Spatio-temporal patterns and driving forces of urban land expansion in china during the economic reform era. Ambio 34:450–455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Li X, Chen Y, Tan Z, Li S, Ai B (2010) A new landscape index for quantifying urban expansion using multi-temporal remotely sensed data. Landscape Ecol 25:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck M, Wu JG (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecol 17:327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps, 3.1st edn. University of Massachusetts, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of statistics (2010) China city statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

  • Olden JD (2006) Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. J Biogeogr 33:2027–2039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Burch WR, Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM, Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG, Millones M (2011) Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens 32:4407–4429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puyravaud JP (2003) Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation. For Ecol Manage 177:593–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Woodcock CE (2008) Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud 45:659–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Fragkias M (2005) Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban land-use change in four cities of China with time series landscape metrics. Landscape Ecol 20:871–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsborough HH (1962) City growth and city structure. J Reg Sci 4:35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecol 19:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG (2008) Making the case for landscape ecology: an effective approach to urban sustainability. Landscape J 27:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2010) Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecol 25:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, David JL (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model 153:7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG, Loucks OL (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70:439–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Jelinski DE, Luck M, Tueller PT (2000) Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geogr Inf Sci 6:6–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG, Jenerette GD, Buyantuyev A, Redman CL (2011) Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: the case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecol Complex 8:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Liu MS, Zhang C, An SQ, Yu W, Chen JM (2007) The spatiotemporal dynamics of rapid urban growth in the Nanjing metropolitan region of China. Landscape Ecol 22:925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Liu MS, Hong C, Chi T, An SQ, Yang XJ (2012) Temporal variation of characteristic scales in urban landscapes: an insight into the evolving internal structures of China’s two largest cities. Landscape Ecol 27:1063–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu XJ, Ng CN (2007) Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban-rural transects: a case study of Guangzhou, China. Landscape Urban Plan 79:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003) Use of normalized difference bulit-up in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 24:583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Wu JG, Grimm NB, McHale M, Buyantuyev A (2013) A hierarchical patch mosaic ecosystem model for urban landscapes: model development and evaluation. Ecol Model 250:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported in part by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30770384), Chinese Ministry of Education (No. 106079), and State Eleventh Five-Year ‘‘211 Project’’ to East China Normal University. We thank H. Niu for his assistance with LUCC data, and G. Sun and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junxiang Li.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 755 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, C., Li, J. & Wu, J. Quantifying the speed, growth modes, and landscape pattern changes of urbanization: a hierarchical patch dynamics approach. Landscape Ecol 28, 1875–1888 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9933-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9933-6

Keywords

Navigation