Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expanding the conservation toolbox: conservation planning of multifunctional landscapes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An area of convergence appears to be emerging between the approaches of conservation planning and the concepts of multifunctional landscapes, which if exploited correctly may assist in overcoming the resource and other constraints faced by biodiversity conservation, while at the same time furthering the aims of multifunctional landscapes to improve production abilities and overall sustainability. Using a multi-zone conservation planning approach, we explore the conservation costs, benefits to biodiversity conservation and possible ecosystem service payments associated with various land-use configurations, in the Little Karoo of South Africa, in order to develop and showcase a multifunctional landscape planning approach and its data requirements, as well as the possible cost savings to conservation agencies. The study uses four conservation planning scenarios, five land-use types, their conservation costs and biodiversity benefits, as well as possible payments from carbon sequestration and tourism. We find that the costs and biodiversity benefits associated with different land-uses varies substantially between land-uses, and also spatially within a land-use type. By incorporating this variation into a multi-zone conservation planning approach land-uses can be allocated in a way that achieves biodiversity targets while at the same time reducing costs by up to 50 % when compared with traditional binary approaches to conservation. Despite some challenges presented by cost and ecosystem service value data and the determination of land-use impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services, the ability of conservation planning approaches to reflect differential contributions of particular land-uses to biodiversity targets and ecosystem services holds much potential for conservation planning, for multifunctional landscape objectives and for growing the resources and partnerships available to the establishment of sustainable and resilient landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ando A, Camm J, Polasky S, Solow A (1998) Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279:2126–2128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Gaston KJ, Blyth S, James A, Kapos V (2003) Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1046–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs R, Reyers B, Scholes RJ (2006) A biodiversity intactness score for South Africa. S Afr J Sci 102:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Binning C (1997) Beyond reserves: options for achieving nature conservation objectives in rural landscapes. In: Klomp N, Lunt I (eds) Frontiers in ecology: building the links. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 155–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Blignaut J, Aronson J, Mander M, Marais C (2008) Investing in natural capital and economic development: South Africa’s Drakensberg Mountains. Ecol Restor 26:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Balmford A (2004) Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-areas systems in developing countries. Bioscience 54:1119–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carwardine J, Wilson KA, Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Naidoo R, Iwamura T, Hajkowicz S, Possingham HP (2008) Cost-effective priorities for global mammal conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11446–11450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carwardine J, Wilson KA, Hajkowicz SA, Smith RJ, Klein CJ, Watts M, Possingham HP (2010) Conservation planning when costs are uncertain. Conserv Biol 24:1529–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrell P, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux D, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9483–9488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dean WRJ, Macdonald IAW (1994) Historical changes in stocking rates of domestic livestock as a measure of semi-arid and arid land degradation in the Cape Province, South Africa. J Arid Environ 26:282–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PG, Cowling RM (2004) Using the species-area relationship to set baseline targets for conservation. Ecol Soc 9:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoh BN, Reyers B, Carwardine J, Bode M, O’Farrell PJ, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, Polasky S, Rouget M, De Lange W, Cowling RM (2010) Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa’s Little Karoo: trade-offs and synergies. Conserv Biol 24:1021–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo JA, Pasquini L, Reyers B, Cowling RM (2009) The role of private conservation areas in biodiversity representation and target achievement within the Little Karoo region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 142:446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon LJ, Finlayson CM, Falkenmark M (2010) Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agric Water Manag 97:512–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale P, Lamb D (1997) Conservation outside nature reserves. Centre for Conservation Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James AN, Gaston KJ, Balmford A (1999) Balancing the Earth’s accounts. Nature 401:323–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Li S, Ouyang Z, Tam C, Chen X (2008) Ecological and socieoeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9477–9482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard AT, Cowling RM, Vlok JHJ, Fabricius C (2010) Designing conservation corridors in production landscapes: assessment methods, implementation issues, and lessons learned. Ecol Soc 15:7. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art7/

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell ST, Johnston DM (2009) Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape? Front Ecol Environ 7:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Lande R (1991) Assessing extinction threats: toward a re-evaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv Biol 5:148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mills AJ, Cowling RM (2006) Rate of carbon sequestration at two thicket restoration sites in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Restor Ecol 14:38–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore J, Balmford A, Allnutt T, Burgess N (2004) Integrating costs into conservation planning across Africa. Biol Conserv 117:343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Ricketts TH (2006) Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol 4(11):e360. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Rouget M (2006) Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol Evol 21:681–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva P, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell PJ, Le Maitre DC, Gelderblom C, Bonora D, Hoffman T, Reyers B (2008) Applying a resilience framework in the pursuit of sustainable land-use development in the Little Karoo, South Africa. In: Burns ME, Weaver A (eds) Exploring sustainability science—a Southern African perspective. SUN Press, Stellenbosch, pp 383–430

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Le Maitre DC, Milton SJ, Egoh B, Maherry A, Colvin C, Atkinson D, De Lange W, Blignaut JN, Cowling RMC (2010) Multi-functional landscapes in semi arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol 25:1231–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell P, Le Maitre D, De Lange W, Reyers B, Blignaut J, Milton S, Atkinson D, Egoh B, Maherry A, Colvin C, Cowling R (2011) The possibilities and pitfalls presented by ecosystem service valuation in an arid biodiversity hotspot. J Arid Environ 75:612–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence GQK, Botha MA, Turpie JK (2003) Evaluating combinations of on- and off-reserve conservation strategies for the Agulhas Plain, South Africa: a financial perspective. Biol Conserv 112:253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, O’Farrell PJ, Cowling RM, Egoh BN, Le Maitre DC, Vlok JHJ (2009) Ecosystem services, land-cover change, and stakeholders: finding a sustainable foothold for a semiarid biodiversity hotspot. Ecol Soc 14(1):38. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art38/

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, Roux DJ, Cowling RM, Ginsburg AE, Nel JL, O’Farrell P (2010) Putting conservation plans to work: conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conserv Biol 24:957–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, Polasky S, Tallis H, Mooney H, Larigauderie A (2012) Finding a common ground for biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 62(5):503–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson SE, Redford KH (2003) Contested relationships between biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. Oryx 37:389–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2010) Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Progress Press, Malta

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald DM, Hobbs NT, Bearly T, Zack JA, Shenk T, Riebsame WE (2000) Incorporating biological information in local landuse decision making: designing a system for conservation planning. Landscape Ecol 15:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpie JK, Marais C, Blignaut JN (2008) The working for water program: evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecol Econ 65:788–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlok JHJ, Cowling RM, Wolf T (2005) A vegetation map for the Little Karoo. Unpublished maps and report for a SKEP project supported by Grant No 1064410304. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Cape Town. http://bgis.sanbi.org/littlekaroo/index.asp. Accessed Jan 2008

  • Watts ME, Ball IR, Stewart RS, Klein CJ, Wilson K, Steinback C, Lourival R, Kircher L, Possingham HP (2009) Marxan with zones: software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning. Environ Model Softw 24:1513–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, Underwood EC, Morrison SA Klausmeyer KR, Murdoch WW, Reyers B, Wardell-Johnson G, Marquet PA, Rundel PW, McBride MF, Pressey RL, Bode M, Hoekstra JM, Andelman SJ, Looker M, Rondinini C, Kareiva P, Shaw MR, Possingham HP (2007) Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where and when. PLoS Biol 5:e223. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, Carwardine J, Possingham HP (2009) Setting conservation priorities. The year in ecology and conservation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1162:237–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, Meijaard E, Drummond S, Grantham HS, Boitani L, Catullo G, Christie L, Dennis R, Dutton I, Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Possingham HP, Rondinini C, Turner W, Venter O, Watts M (2010) Conserving biodiversity in production landscapes. Ecol Appl 20:1721–1732. doi:10.1890/09-1051.1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Willem de Lange for his insights into conservation costs. We also thank Richard Cowling and Jan Vlok for initiating this project. The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, National Research Foundation of South Africa and Australian Research Council are thanked for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belinda Reyers.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 50 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reyers, B., O’Farrell, P.J., Nel, J.L. et al. Expanding the conservation toolbox: conservation planning of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape Ecol 27, 1121–1134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9761-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9761-0

Keywords

Navigation