Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy hierarchy and landscape sustainability

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of ecosystems suggests principles by which energy flows generate hierarchies in all systems. All ecosystems in the landscapes are associated with energy transformation and the convergence of transformed products toward higher hierarchical levels, the recycling of materials to dispersed backgrounds, and feedbacks to reinforce the supporting environment. A hierarchy can be seen as an organized pattern with many small units at one level contributing to fewer units at the next higher level. Due to spatial variability in the natural environment, different types and amounts of energy received on the earth are not homogeneous; this in turn generates a heterogeneous pattern on the landscape. Energy from life-support and production systems of a heterogeneous landscape is transformed and converged spatially toward consumption centers. All energy transformation can be arranged in a series. The concept of transformity is used in this paper to indicate the position of an energy flow in the series. A hierarchical system can help to explain how energy and matter can be produced and recycled through each level of energy transfer. Building on the brief reviews of the concept of hierarchy in the landscape and the theoretical development of the concept of an ecological energetic hierarchy, this paper proposes two principles of energetic hierarchy for landscape sustainability. First, the landscape must be arranged spatially according to its energy hierarchy. Evaluation of normalized energy flows (emergy) can help identify zones of different spatial hierarchies, which will help establish the strategies needed for the landscapes to be sustainable. Second, a sustainable landscape must comprise a hierarchy of self-organizing ecosystems that can enable the systems to maximize useful power at all levels of the energy hierarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen TFH, Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2006) Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landsc Urban Plan 75:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T (2006) The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital. Landsc Urban Plan 7:198–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botequilha Leitão A, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Odum HT, Jorgensen SE (2004) Energy hierarchy and transformity in the universe. Ecol Model 178:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai TT, Olsen TW, Campbell DE (2004) Maximum (em)power: a foundation principle linking man and nature. Ecol Model 178:115–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DE (2001) Proposal for including what is valuable to ecosystem in environmental assessments. Environ Sci Technol 35:2867–2873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doing H (1997) The landscape as an ecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 63:221–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dramstad WE, Fjellstad WJ (2011) Landscapes: bridging the gaps between science, policy and people. Landsc Urban Plan 100:330–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (2008) The urban region: natural systems in our place, our nourishment, our home range, our future. Landscape Ecol 23:251–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S-L (1998) Ecological energetic, hierarchy, and urban form: a system modelling approach to the evolution of urban zonation. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 25:391–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S-L, Chen C-W (2005) Theory of urban energetic and mechanisms of urban development. Ecol Model 189:19–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S-L, Odum HT (1991) Ecology and economy: emergy synthesis and public policy in Taiwan. J Environ Manag 32:313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S-L, Lai H-Y, Lee C-L (2001) Energy hierarchy and urban landscape system. Landsc Urban Plan 53:145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S-L, Budd WW, Chan S-L, Lin Y-C (2007) Stream order, hierarchy, and energy convergence of land use. Ecol Model 205:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S-L, Chen Y-H, Kuo F-Y, Wang S-H (2011) Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services. Ecol Complexity 8:38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AW (2005) Hierarchy theory and the landscape……level? Or, Words do matter. In: Wiens JA, Moss MR (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muller F (1998) Gradients in ecological systems. Ecol Model 108:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2007) Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 22:1437–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SN (2000) Thermodynamics of an ecosystem interpreted as a hierarchy of embedded systems. Ecol Model 135:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV (2005) Theory in landscape ecology. In: Wiens JA, Moss MR (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, DeAngeli DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1971) Environment, power, and society. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1982) Systems ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1988) Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science 242:1132–1139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT, Brown MT, Whitefield LS, Woithe R, Doherty S (1995) Zonal organization of cities and environment: a study of energy systems basis for urban society. A report to the Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange. Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville

  • Palik PJ, Goebel PC, Kirkman LK, West L (2000) Using landscape hierarchies to guide restoration of disturbed ecosystems. Ecol Appl 10:189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry DA (1995) Self-organizing systems across scales. Tree 10:241–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Picket STA, Cadenasso ML (1955) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2006a) Landscape and sustainability. Landsc Urban Plan 75:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2006b) “Rio + 10”, sustainability science and landscape ecology. Landsc Urban Plan 75:162–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratze C, Gillet F, Muller J-P, Stoffel K (2007) Simulation of ecological hierarchies in constructive dynamical systems. Ecol Complexity 4:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1973) The organization of complex systems. In: Pattee HH (ed) Hierarchy theory: the challenge of complex systems. George Braziller, New York, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P, Brink A (2007) Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 79:374–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban DL, O’Neill RV, Shugart HH (1987) Landscape ecology. Bio Sci 37:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (1999) Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Can J Remote Sens 25:267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, David JL (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model 153:7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-Li Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, YC., Yeh, CT. & Huang, SL. Energy hierarchy and landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 28, 1151–1159 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9706-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9706-7

Keywords

Navigation