Abstract
This work examines the proposition that positive interactions among neighboring individuals within a population may produce landscape patterns in boundary intensity. The large scale patterns emerge because the interactions favor an aggregated distribution in the face of a potential limiting factor, and the strength of that factor varies over the landscape. The consequences of spatially varying neighborhood processes were explored using cellular automata simulating the structure of mussel beds in 2-dimensional intertidal landscapes, each characterized by a vertical gradient of tidal immersion and a horizontal gradient of wave energy. Running the model with and without the neighborhood processes demonstrated that the facilitating neighborhood processes elevate intensity above that caused by the gradients, and consequently abrupt (high intensity) boundaries emerged in the midst of gradual environmental variation. Trends generated on the 2-D landscape by the model were compared with those in photo-mosaics of intertidal mussel beds, Mytilus californianus on rocky shores of the British Columbia. The analysis involved interpolation of boundary locations using a spatially-constrained cluster algorithm, and then estimation of the corresponding boundary intensities using a landscape index aggregation (CLUMPY). The general similarity between predicted and real trends in intensity over the wave energy gradients suggests that spatially varying neighborhood processes determine much of the landscape scale variation in boundary intensity, while certain discrepancies (e.g. a more rapid rise of observed intensities with increasing wave exposure) suggest modifications of the theory and new empirical work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell EC, Denny MW (1994) Quantifying “wave exposure”: a simple device for recording maximum velocity and results of its use in several field studies. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 181:9–29
Bertness MD, Grosholtz E (1985) Population dynamics of the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa: the costs and benefits of an aggregated distribution. Oecologia 67:192–204
Bertness MD, Leonard GH (1997) The role of positive interactions in communities: lessons from intertidal habitats. Ecology 7:1976–1989
Blakeway DR, Robles CD, Fuentes DA, Qiu H-L (2004) Spatially extensive high resolution images of rocky shore communities. In: Seurant L, Strutton P (eds) Handbook of scaling methods in aquatic ecology: measurement, analysis, simulation. CRC Press, New York, pp 109–124
Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125
Connell JH (1972) Community interactions on marine rocky intertidal shores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:169–192
Dehnel PA (1956) Growth rates in latitudinally separated populations of Mytilus californianus. Biol Bull 110:43–53
Donalson DD, Desharnais RA, Robles CD, Nisbet RM (2004) Chapter 27: spatial dynamics of a benthic community. In: Seuront LaPGS (ed) Handbook of scaling methods in aquatic ecology: measurement, analysis, simulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 429–444
Fagan WF, Fortin MJ, Soykan C (2003) Integrating edge detection and dynamic modeling in quantitative analyses of ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53:730–738
Gordon AD (1999) Classification, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Gosz J (1993) Ecotone hierarchies. Ecol Appl 3:369–376
Guichard F, Halpin PM, Allison GW, Lubchenco J, Menge BA (2003) Mussel disturbance dynamics: signatures of oceanic forcing from local interactions. Am Nat 161:889–904
Harley CDG (2007) Zonation. In: Denny M, Gaines SD (eds) Encyclopedia of tidepools and rocky shores. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 647–653
Harley CDG, Helmuth BST (2003) Local- and regional-scale effects of wave exposure, thermal stress, and absolute versus effective shore level on patterns of intertidal zonation. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1498–1508
Hinchley E, Nicholson M, Zajac R, Irlandi E (2007) Preface: marine and coastal applications in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9141-3
Kopp JC (1979) Growth and the intertidal gradient in the sea mussel Mytilus californianus Conrad, 1837. Veliger 22:51–56
Legendre P, Fortin MJ (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107–138
McGarigal K, Cushaman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amerherst, Massachusetts, USA. Available at www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
Neel MC, McGarigal K, Cushaman SA (2004) Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landscape Ecol 19:435–455
Nielson KJ, Franz DR (1995) The influence of adult conspecifics and shore level on recruitment of the ribbed mussel Geukensia demissa (Dillwyn). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 188:89–98
O’Neill R, Johnson A, King A (1989) A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecol 3:193–205
Paine RT (1974) Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15:93–120
Paine RT (2002) Advances in ecological understanding: by Kuhnian revolution or conceptual evolution? Ecology 83:1553–1559
Risser PG (1995) The status of the science examining ecotones. Bioscience 45:318–325
Robles CD, Desharnais RA (2002) History and current development of a paradigm of predation in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 83:1521–1537
Robles C, Sweetnam DA, Dittman D (1989) Diel variation in intertidal foraging of Cancer productus L. in British Columbia. J Nat His 23:1041–1049
Robles C, Sherwood-Stephens R, Alvarado M (1995) Responses of a key intertidal predator to varying recruitment of its prey. Ecology 76:565–579
Robles CD, Desharnais RA, Garza C, Donahue MJ, Martinez CA (2009) Complex equilibria in the maintenance of boundaries: experiments with mussel beds. Ecology 90:985–995
Strayer DL, Power ME, Fagan WF, Pickett STA, Belnap J (2003) A classification of ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53:723–729
Turner G (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197
van de Koppel J, Rietkerk M, Dankers N, Herman P (2005) Scale-dependent feedback and regular spatial patterns in young mussel beds. Am Nat 165:E66–E77
Vandermeer J, Yodis P (1999) Basin boundary collision as a model of discontinuous change in ecosystems. Ecology 80:1817–1827
Wilson JB, Agnew ADQ (1992) Postive feedback switches in plant communities. Adv Ecol Res 23:263–336
Wilson WG, Nisbet RM (1997) Cooperation and competition along smooth environmental gradients. Ecology 78:2004–2017
Wilson WG, Nisbet RM, Ross AH, Robles CD, Desharnais RA (1996) Abrupt population changes along smooth environmental gradients. Bull Math Biol 58:907–922
Acknowledgments
Drafts of the manuscript were improved by D. Jelinski, J. van de Koppel, W. Wilson, and an anonymous reviewer. D. Fuentes assembled the mosaics and assisted other aspects of spatial analysis. Field assistants included C. Carrion, D. Fuentes, A. Martinez, and N. Sarkisian. We appreciate the assistance of the staff of the Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grants #RUI0089842, #HRD9805529, and #EF0827595. The fieldwork complied with the laws of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robles, C.D., Garza, C., Desharnais, R.A. et al. Landscape patterns in boundary intensity: a case study of mussel beds. Landscape Ecol 25, 745–759 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9450-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9450-9