Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape ecology and conservation share a common focus on places, but they differ in their perspectives about what is important about those places, and the integration of landscape ecology into conservation is far from complete. I consider four ways in which landscape ecology can contribute to conservation. First, protected areas that are established for conservation are not stand-alone isolates. They exist in the context of broader landscape mosaics, which may encourage or discourage movements of individuals into and out of an area. Second, the landscape surroundings of a preserve may contain threats to the biodiversity within the preserve, many of them consequences of human activities. In combination, these relationships with the surroundings may make the “effective area” of a preserve different from that shown on a map. Third, the scale of an administrative area or of management action may not coincide with the scales of populations, disturbances, or ecological processes, creating challenges to both landscape ecology and conservation. Finally, landscapes encompass people and their activities; sustainability of conservation requires consideration of the tradeoffs between human uses and the biodiversity values of a landscape. I illustrate these four themes with a case study of the management of prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) in the Great Plains of North America, where the tensions between conservation and human land uses are particularly high. Ecologists and conservationists consider prairie dogs as keystone species in these grassland ecosystems and primary targets for conservation, but many private landowners regard them as varmints that consume valuable livestock forage and degrade rangeland condition. Effective conservation of functioning grasslands must include prairie dogs, and this in turn requires that the issues be addressed in terms of the biological, social, and cultural features of entire landscapes. Important as they are, areas protected for conservation cannot by themselves stem the tide of global biodiversity loss. The perspective must be broadened to include the landscapes where people live and work, recognizing the dynamic nature of landscapes and the factors driving land-use change. Landscape ecologists must work together to overcome the cultural differences between their disciplines, and between academic science and conservation practice and management. It can, and must, be done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antolin MF, Gober P, Luce B, Biggins DE, Van Pelt WE, Seery DB et al (2002) The influence of sylvatic plague on North American wildlife at the landscape level, with special emphasis on black-footed ferret and prairie dog conservation. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 67:104–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Antolin MF, Savage LT, Eisen RJ (2006) Landscape features influence genetic structure of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Landsc Ecol 21:867–875. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-5220-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissonette JA, Storch I (eds) (2003) Landscape ecology and resource management. Linking theory with practice. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnin M, Bruszik A, Delbaere B, Lethier H, Richard D, Rienties S et al (2007) The Pan-European ecological network: taking stock. Nature and Environment No. 146. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) (2001) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) (2006) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Ellison K (2002) The new economy of nature. The quest to make conservation profitable. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Derner JD, Detling JK, Antolin MF (2006) Are livestock gains affected by blacktailed prairie dogs? Front Ecol Environ 4:459–464. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[459:ALWGAB]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves CR (2003) Drafting a conservation blueprint. A practitioner’s guide to planning for biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ (ed) (2002) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland JL (ed) (2006) Conservation of the black-tailed prairie dog. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hygnstrom SE, Virchow DR (1994). Prairie dogs. In: Prevention and control of wildlife damage. Cooperative Extension Division, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, pp B-85–B-92

  • IUCN (1994) Guidelines for protected area management categories. World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland. Available at http://www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/1994-007-En.pdf

  • IUCN-CMP (2006) Unified classification of direct threats. Available at http://www.conservationmeasures.org/CMP/Site_Page.cfm?PageID=32

  • Janzen DH (1983) No park is an island: increase in interference from outside as park size decreases. Oikos 41:402–410. doi:10.2307/3544100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RH, Pungetti G (2004) Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design, implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PK, Watts S, McDonald R, Boucher T (2007) Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316:1866–1869. doi:10.1126/science.1140170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Gilgert WC, Marston G (2002) Ranching west of the 100th meridian: culture, ecology, and economics. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar NB (2000) Application of the new keystone species concept to prairie dogs: how well does it work? Conserv Biol 14:1715–1721. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98384.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler JJ, White D, Neilson RP, Blaustein AR (2006) Predicting climate-induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability. Glob Change Biol 12:1568–1584. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01191.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1933) Game management. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (eds) (2007) Managing and designing landscapes for conservation. Moving from perspectives to principles. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Taylor WW (eds) (2002) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C, Sarkar S (2007) Systematic conservation planning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews SN, Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Peters MP (2007) A climate change atlas for 147 bird species of the Eastern United States (database). Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Delaware OH (Available at http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/bird)

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00420.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1997) Placing nature. Culture and landscape ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2005) Toward a transdisciplinary landscape science. In: Wiens J, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 346–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Wiens JA (2002) Fragmentation, habitat loss and landscape management. In: Norris K, Pain DJ (eds) Conserving bird biodiversity. General principles and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 202–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson DL, Parker VT (eds) (1998) Ecological scale. Theory and applications. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Matthews S, Peters M (2007) A climate change atlas for 134 forest tree species of the Eastern United States (database). Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Delaware OH (Available at http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/tree)

  • Pressey RL, Cowling RM (2001) Reserve selection algorithms and the real world. Conserv Biol 15:275–277. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99541.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661. doi:10.1086/284880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (2003) Win-win ecology: how the Earth’s species can survive in the midst of human enterprise. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson EW, Jeiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52:891–904. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekercioglu CH, Schneider SH, Fay JP, Loarie SR (2008) Climate change, elevational range shifts, and bird extinctions. Conserv Biol 22:140–150. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00852.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer CL (1990) Nature reserves. Island theory and conservation practice. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapp P, Antolin MF, Ball M (2004) Patterns of extinction in prairie dog metapopulations: plague outbreaks follow El Niño events. Front Ecol Environ 2:235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BLII, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF, Mathews JT, Meyer WB (eds) (1990) The earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Crow TR, Liu J et al (2002) Bridging the gap between landscape ecology and nature resource management. In: Liu J, Taylor WW (eds) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 433–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397. doi:10.2307/2389612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1994) Habitat fragmentation: island vs. landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis 117:S97–S104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2001) The landscape context of dispersal. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 96–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2007a) The dangers of black-and-white conservation. Conserv Biol 21:1371–1372. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00695.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2007b) The demise of wildness? Bull Br Ecol Soc 38(4):78–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2007c) Does conservation need landscape ecology? A perspective from both sides of the divide. In: Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (eds) Managing and designing landscapes for conservation. Moving from perspectives to principles. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp 479–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Stenseth NC, Van Horne B, Ims RA (1993) Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66:369–380. doi:10.2307/3544931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615. doi:10.2307/1313420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) (2006) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology. Methods and applications. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Robert Manes, Chris Pague, and several TNC conservation staff helped to develop the prairie dog example; their efforts to conserve prairie dogs and grassland ecosystems in a socially contentious climate should be recognized. T. Boucher of TNC provided Fig. 4. Thanks also to Laura Musacchio and Jianguo Wu for providing the opportunity to marshal these thoughts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Nature Conservancy, 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA, 22203, USA

    John A. Wiens

  2. PRBO Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Dr. #11, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA

    John A. Wiens

Authors
  1. John A. Wiens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Wiens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiens, J.A. Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation. Landscape Ecol 24, 1053–1065 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9284-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9284-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation