Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cultural landscapes of Germany are patch-corridor-matrix mosaics for an invasive megaforb

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predicting the vulnerability of landscapes to both the initial colonisation and the subsequent spread of invasive species remains a major challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the relative importance of sub-patch level factors and landscape factors for the invasion of the megaforb Heracleum mantegazzianum. In particular, we tested which factors affect the presence in suitable habitat patches and the cover-percentage within invaded patches. For this purpose, we used standard (logistic) regression modelling techniques. The regression analyses were based on inventories of suitable habitat patches in 20 study areas (each 1 km2) in cultural landscapes of Germany. The cover percentage in invaded patches was independent from landscape factors, except for patch shape, and even unsatisfactorily explained by sub-patch level factors included in the analysis (R 2 = 0.19). In contrast, presence of H. mantegazzianum was affected by both local and landscape factors. Woody habitat structure decreased the occurrence probability, whereas vicinity to transport corridors (rivers, roads), high habitat connectivity, patch size and perimeter-area ratio of habitat patches had positive effects. The significance of corridors and habitat connectivity shows that dispersal of H. mantegazzianum through the landscape matrix is limited. We conclude that cultural landscapes of Germany function as patch-corridor-matrix mosaics for the spread of H. mantegazzianum. Our results highlight the importance of landscape structure and habitat configuration for invasive spread. Furthermore, this study shows that both local and landscape factors should be incorporated into spatially explicit models to predict spatiotemporal dynamics and equilibrium stages of plant invasions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartuszevige AM, Gorchov DL, Raab L (2006) The relative importance of landscape and community features in the invasion of an exotic shrub in a fragmented landscape. Ecography 29:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey JM (1999) Phenology and long-term control of Heracleum mantegazzianum. Hydrobiologia 415:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collingham YC, Huntley B (2000) Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. Ecol Appl 10:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Blois S, Domon G, Bouchard A (2002) Landscape issues in plant ecology. Ecography 25:244–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckers B, Verheyen K, Hermy M, Muys B (2005) Effects of landscape structure on the invasive spread of black cherry Prunus serotina in an agricultural landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Ecography 28:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deil U, Ludemann T (2003) Vegetation analysis at the landscape level—an introduction. Phytocoenologia 33:561–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupré C, Ehrlén J (2002) Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. J Ecol 90:796–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2003) Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: a response to Freckleton and Watkinson. J Ecol 91:316–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (2001) Landscape fragmentation and the viability of plant populations. In: Silvertown J, Antonovics J (eds) Integrating ecology and evolutions in a spatial context. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Cousins SAO, Bruun HH (2002) Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia. J Veg Sci 13:743–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Freckleton RP, Watkinson AR (2002) Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. J Ecol 90:419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbard JL, Belnap J (2003) Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv Biol 17:420–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godefroid S, Koedam N (2004) The impact of forest paths upon adjacent vegetation: effects of the path surfacing material on the species composition and soil compaction. Biol Conserv 119:405–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MJ, Clevenger AP (2005) The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. Biol Conserv 125:249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horskins K, Mather PB, Wilson JC (2006) Corridors and connectivity: when use and function do not equate. Landsc Ecol 21:641–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüls J (2005) Untersuchungen zur Populationsbiologie an Heracleum mantegazzianum Somm. & Lev. in Subpopulationen unterschiedlicher Individuendichte. Dissertation, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

  • Jelinski DE, Wu J (1996) The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 11:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AW, With KA (2002) Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter? Ecol Model 147:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner F, Ferdy J-B, Andalo C, Colas B, Moret J (2003) Role of corridors in plant dispersal: an example with the endangered Ranunculus nodiflorus. Conserv Biol 17:401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb A, Diekmann M (2005) Effects of life-history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 19:929–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Callaway RM (2004) Rethinking plant community theory. Oikos 107:433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep PNW-351, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J (2005) Aerial photographs as a tool for assessing the regional dynamics of the invasive plant species Heracleum mantegazzianum. J Appl Ecol 42:1042–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy HT, Lovett-Doust J (2004) Context and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter? Oikos 105:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte A, Franke R (1998) The ecology of the Caucasian herbaceous perennial Heracleum mantegazzianum Somm. et Lev. (Giant Hogweed) in cultural ecosystems of Central Europe. Phytocoenologia 28:205–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte A, Eckstein RL, Thiele J (2007) Heracleum mantegazzianum in its primary distribution range of the Western Greater Caucasus. In: Pyšek P, Cock MJW, Nentwig W, Ravn HP (eds) Ecology and management of Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Parendes LA, Jones JA (2000) Role of light availability and dispersal in exotic plant invasion along roads and streams in the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon. Conserv Biol 14:64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauchard A, Alaback PB (2004) Influence of elevation, land use, and landscape context on patterns of alien plant invasions along roadsides in protected areas of south-central Chile. Conserv Biol 18:238–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P (1991) Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republik: dynamics of spreading from the historical perspective. Folia Geobot 26:439–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Pyšek A (1995) Invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in different habitats in the Czech Republic. J Veg Sci 6:711–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rentch JS, Fortney RH, Stephenson SL, Adams HS, Grafton WN, Anderson JT (2005) Vegetation-site relationships of roadside plant communities in West Virginia, USA. J Appl Ecol 42:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rew LJ, Maxwell BD, Aspinall R (2005) Predicting the occurrence of nonindigenous species using environmental and remotely sensed data. Weed Sci 53:236–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker IM, Bishop JG (1994) Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson CM, MacKenzie ML, Edwards C, Travis JMJ (2006) Modelling establishment probabilities of an exotic plant, Rhododendron ponticum, invading a heterogeneous, woodland landscape using logistic regression with spatial autocorrelation. Ecol Model 193:747–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM, Sargent S, Orrock JL, Weldon A, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff J, Damschen EI, Townsend P (2002) Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12923–12926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele J, Otte A (2006) Analysis of habitats and communities invaded by Heracleum mantegazzianum Somm. et Lev. (Giant Hogweed) in Germany. Phytocoenologia 36:281–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele J, Otte A (2008) Invasion patterns of Heracleum mantegazzianum in Germany on the regional and landscape scale. J Nat Conservat 16(1)

  • Tiley GED, Dodd FS, Wade PM (1996) Heracleum mantegazzianum SOMMIER & LEVIER. J Ecol 84:297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2002) Central concepts and issues of landscape ecology. In: Gutzwiller KJ (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • With KA (2004) Assessing the risk of invasive spread in fragmented landscapes. Risk Anal 24:803–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out as part of the EU-Project ‘Giant Alien’ (Project-No.: EVK2-2001-CT-00128). We thank Lutz Eckstein, Dietmar Simmering, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, Giessen, 35392, Germany

    Jan Thiele, Ulrike Schuckert & Annette Otte

Authors
  1. Jan Thiele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulrike Schuckert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Annette Otte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Thiele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thiele, J., Schuckert, U. & Otte, A. Cultural landscapes of Germany are patch-corridor-matrix mosaics for an invasive megaforb. Landscape Ecol 23, 453–465 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9202-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9202-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation