Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial models for inferring topographic controls on historical low-severity fire in the eastern Cascade Range of Washington, USA

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire regimes are complex systems that represent an aggregate of spatial and temporal events whose statistical properties are scale dependent. Despite the breadth of research regarding the spatial controls on fire regime variability, few datasets are available with sufficient resolution to test spatially explicit hypotheses. We used a spatially distributed network of georeferenced fire-scarred trees to investigate the spatial structure of fire occurrence at multiple scales. Mantel’s tests and geostatistical analysis of fire-occurrence time series led to inferences about the mechanisms that generated spatial patterns of historical fire synchrony (multiple trees recording fire in a single year) in eastern Washington, USA. The spatial autocorrelation structure of historical fire regimes varied within and among sites, with clearer patterns in the complex rugged terrain of the Cascade Range than in more open and rolling terrain further north and east. Results illustrate that the statistical spatial characteristics of fire regimes change with landform characteristics within a forest type, suggesting that simple relationships between fire frequency, fire synchrony, and forest type do not exist. Quantifying the spatial structures in fire occurrence associated with topographic variation showed that fire regime variability depends on both landscape structure and the scale of measurement. Spatially explicit fire-scar data open new possibilities for analysis and interpretation, potentially informing the design and application of fire management on landscapes, including hazardous fuel treatments and the use of fire for ecosystem restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. High resolution graphics of topographic complexity for the seven sites are available from the corresponding author. These provide a point of departure, albeit qualitative, for such a multi-scale analysis.

References

  • Agee JK (1993) Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Agee JK (1994) Fire and weather disturbances in terrestrial ecosystems of the eastern Cascades. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-320, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR

  • Agee JK, Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For Ecol Manage 211:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen CD, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgan P, Hoffman M, Klingel JT (2002) Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol Appl 12:1418–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arno SF, Sneck KM (1977) A method for determining fire history in coniferous forests of the mountain west. USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep INT-GTR-42. Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT

  • Baker WL (1989) Effect of scale and spatial heterogeneity on fire-interval distributions. Can J For Res 19:700–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey RG (1996) Ecosystem geography. Springer-Verlag, Inc., New York, NY, 216 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SW (1980) Indians and fire. Western Wildl 6:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JK, Smith JK (eds) (2000) Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, 257 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1985) Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares. Math Geol 17:563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly C, Neilson RP, Phillips DL (1994) A digital topographic model for distributing precipitation over mountainous terrain. J Appl Meteorol 33:140–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich JH, Swetnam TW (1984) Dendrochronology of fire-scarred ponderosa pine. For Sci 30:238–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutilleul P (1998) From forest stands to landscapes: spatial scales and the roles of disturbances. In: Peterson DL, Parker VT (eds) Ecological Scale. Columbia University Press, New York, USA, pp 369–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorner B, Lertzman K, Fall J (2002) Landscape pattern in topographically complex landscapes: issues and techniques for analysis. Landsc Ecol 17:729–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2006) ArcGis. Version 9.0. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA

  • Everett RL, Schelhaas R, Keenum D, Spubeck D, Ohlson P (2000) Fire history in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir forests on the east slope of the Washington Cascades. For Ecol Manage 129:207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk DA, Miller CM, McKenzie D, Black AE (2007) Cross-scale analysis of fire regimes. Ecosystems 10:809–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder J (1988) Fractals. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M-J, Payette S (2002) How to test the significance of the relation between spatially autocorrelated data at the landscape scale: a case study using fire and forest maps. Ecoscience 9:213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Dyrness CT (1988) Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Eugene, Oregon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedalof ZM, Peterson DL, Mantua NJ (2005) Atmospheric, climatic, and ecological controls on extreme wildfire years in the northwestern United States. Ecol Appl 15:154–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann WJ, Strohm DJ (2003) Fire regime condition class and associated data for fire and fuels planning: methods and applications. In: Omi PN, Joyce LA (eds) Proceedings of the 2002 conference on fire, fuel treatments, and ecological restoration. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-29, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp 227–443

  • Hessl AE, McKenzie D, Schellhaas R (2004) Drought and Pacific Decadal Oscillation linked to fire occurrence in the inland Pacific Northwest. Ecol Appl 14:425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessl AE, Miller J, Kernan J, McKenzie D (2007) Mapping wildfire boundaries from binary point data: comparing approaches. Prof Geographer 59:87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyerdahl EK, Brubaker LB, Agee JK (2001) Spatial controls of historical fire regimes: a multiscale example from the interior West, USA. Ecology 82:660–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyerdahl EK, McKenzie D, Daniels LD, Hessl AE, Littell JS, Mantua NJ. Climate drivers of regionally synchronous fires in the inland Northwest (1651–1900). Int J Wildland Fire (in press)

  • Insightful, Inc. S-PLUS v. 6.0. (2000) Seattle, WA, USA

  • Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EA, Gutsell SL (1994) Fire frequency models, methods, and interpretations. Adv Ecol Res 25:239–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan GJ, Fortin M-J, Lertzman KP (2005) Assessing spatial uncertainty associated with forest fire boundary delineation. Landsc Ecol 20:719–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzberger T, Brown PM, Heyerdahl EK, Swetnam TW, Veblen TT (2006) Contingent Pacific-Atlantic Ocean influence on multicentury wildfire synchrony over western North America. Proc Nat Acad Sci doi:10.1073/pnas.060607810410.1073/pnas.0606078104

  • Legendre P, Fortin M-J (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre, L (1998) Numerical ecology, Second English Edition. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Troussellier M (1988) Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria: modeling in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1055–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Lertzman K, Fall J (1998) From forest stands to landscapes: spatial scales and the roles of disturbances. In: Peterson DL, Parker VT (eds) Ecological scale. Columbia University Press, New York, USA, pp 339–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud BD, Morein G, Turcotte DL (1998) Forest fires: an example of self-organized critical behavior. Science 281:1840–1842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D, Gedalof Z, Peterson DL, Mote P (2004) Climatic change, wildfire, and conservation. Conserv Biol 18:890–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D, Hessl AE, Kellogg L-KB (2006a) Using neutral models to identify constraints on low-severity fire regimes. Landsc Ecol 21:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D, Kellogg L-KB, Falk DA, Miller CM, Black AE (2006b) Scaling laws and fire-size distributions in historical low-severity fire regimes. Geophys Res Abs 8:1607–7962/gra/EGU06-A-01436

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz MA, Morais ME, Summerell LA, Carlson JM, Doyle J (2005) Wildfires, complexity, and highly optimized tolerance. Proc of Nat Acad Sci (USA) 102:17912–17917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oden NL, Sokal RR (1992) An investigation of three-matrix permutation tests. J Classification 9:275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins WG (1999) Landscape and environment: ecological change in the Intermontane Northwest. In: Boyd R (ed) Indians, fire, and the land in the Pacific Northwest. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, pp 219–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins WG, Wolf DW (1994) Landscape and the intermontane Northwest: an environmental history. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-319, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR

  • Schmidt KM, Menakis JP, Hardy CC, Hann WJ, Bunnell DL (2002) Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-87. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

  • Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zool 35:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen T (1948) A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in a plant based on similarity of species content and its applications to analysis of vegetation on Danish commons. Biol Skr 5:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Swetnam TW, Betancourt JL (1999) Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climatic variability in the American Southwest. J Climate 11:3128–3147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swezy DM, Agee JK (1991) Prescribed-fire effects on fine-root and tree mortality in old-growth ponderosa pine. Can J For Res 21:626–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tande GF (1979) Fire history and vegetation pattern of coniferous forests in Jasper National Park, Alberta. Can J Bot 57:1912–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH, Skinner CN (1998) Fire history and landscape dynamics in a late-successional reserve, Klamath Mountains, California, USA. For Ecol Manage 44:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH, Skinner CN (2003) Spatial and temporal patterns of historic fire regimes and forest structure as a reference for restoration of fire in the Klamath Mountains. Ecol Appl 13:704–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte DL (1989) Fractals in geophysics. Pure Appl Geophys 131:171–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen TT, Kitzberger T, Donnegan J (2000) Climatic and human influences on fire regimes in ponderosa pine forests in the Colorado Front Range. Ecol Appl 10:1178–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner HH (2003) Spatial covariance in plant communities: integrating ordination, geostatistics, and variance testing. Ecology 84:1045–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Hall CHS, Cornell JD, Hall MHP (2002) Spatial dependence and the relationship of soil organic carbon and soil moisture in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Landsc Ecol 17:671–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R,Oliver MA (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Lara-Karena Kellogg. She was orders of magnitude larger than life and continues to inspire us in both our work and our daily lives. We thank Robert Norheim for help with cartography and Marie-Josée Fortin and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Research was supported by the Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, and by an award from the Joint Fire Sciences Program (No. 01-1-6-01) under a cooperative agreement between the USDA Forest Service and the University of Washington (PNW 02-CA-11261987-071).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald McKenzie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kellogg, LK.B., McKenzie, D., Peterson, D.L. et al. Spatial models for inferring topographic controls on historical low-severity fire in the eastern Cascade Range of Washington, USA. Landscape Ecol 23, 227–240 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9188-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9188-1

Keywords

Navigation