Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landscape effects of forest loss in a pollination system

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest loss has been invoked as a cause for changes in the reproductive success of animal-pollinated woodland plants, associated with changes in their pollinators. To analyze such effects, it is important to include all of the three key players: landscapes, pollinators and a plant. We investigated effects of forest loss on an insect-pollinated plant through landscapes in forested ecosystems to pollinator communities and plant populations. Then we questioned if abundance and species richness in pollinator communities decrease as forest loss increases, and this in turn leads to a decrease in reproductive output of an insect-pollinated plant. We made a study with 12 populations of the bee pollinated herb, Erythronium americanum, in a landscape characterized by scattered fragments of deciduous forest within intensively managed agricultural fields. We also sampled bees as the potential pollinators by pan traps. We quantified the study landscapes using the amount of forest cover and the length of forest edge within each of the six radii (250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,250 and 1,500 m). Regression analyses showed that the abundance and species richness of all collected bees were positively related to only the forest cover at the radius of 750 m. We also found the positive relationships for the seed set of E. americanum when the forest cover at the same radius and abundance of all collected bees were used as the predictor variables. These results indicate that forest loss causes negative impacts on potential pollinator communities and seed sets of some woodland herbs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agren J (1996) Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology 77:1779–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar R, Galetto L (2004) Effects of forest fragmentation on male and female reproductive success in Cestrum parqui (Solanaceae). Oecologia 138:513–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L et al (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9:968–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994a) Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75:330–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994b) Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey bees in Argentina Chaco Serrano. Ecol Appl 4:378–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen GM, Eagles PFJ, Price SD (eds) (1990) Conserving Carolinian Canada. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen-Wardell G, Bernhardt P, Bitner R et al (1998) The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conserv Biol 12:8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argus GW (1992) The phytogeography of rare vascular plants in Ontario and its bearing on plants conservation. Can J Bot 70:469–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR et al (1998) Forest ecology, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Belaoussoff S, Kevan PG, Murphy S et al (2003) Assessing tillage disturbance on assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) by using a range of ecological indices. Biodivers Conserv 12:851–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt P (1977) The pollination ecology of a population of Erythronium americanum Ker (Liliaceae). Rhodora 79:278–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SP, Reemer M et al (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchan N (1916) Wild flowers: an aid to knowledge of our wild flowers and their insect visitors. Doubleday, Page & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP (1996) The forgotten pollinators. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns CE, Villanueva-Gutierrez R, Koptur S et al (2005) Bee populations, forest disturbance, and africanization in Mexico. Biotropica 37:686–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH (2001) Habitat fragmentation and native bees: a premature verdict? Conserv Ecol 5:3. Available from http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art3 (accessed February 2007).

  • Cane JH, Minckley RL, Kervin LJ (2000) Sampling bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) for pollinator community studies: pitfalls of pan-trapping. J Kans Entomol Soc 73:225–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SA (2000a) Depressed pollination in habitat fragments causes low fruit set. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 267:1149–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SA (2000b) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive ecology of four plant species in mallee woodland. Conserv Biol 14:758–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Ghazoul J, Stork NE et al (1996) Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trend Ecol Evol 11:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson J, Nanni I, Zachariades C et al (2002) Effects of habitat fragmentation on pollinator diversity and plant reproductive success in renosterveld shrublands of South Africa. Conserv Biol 16:1267–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth SA (2003) Density-dependent seed set in the Haleakala silversword: evidence for an Allee effect. Oecologia 136:551–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankie GW, Vinson SB, Rizzardi MA et al (1997) Diversity and abundance of bees visiting a mass flowering tree species in disturbed seasonal dry forest, Costa Rica. J Kans Entomol Soc 70:281–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathmann A, Tscharntke T (2002) Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 71:757–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul J, McLeish M (2002) Reproductive ecology of tropical forest trees in logged and fragmented habitats in Thailand and Costa Rica. Plant Ecol 153:335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1963) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Van Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder LD, Thomson JD, Cruzan MB et al (1985) Sexual reproduction and variation in floral morphology in an ephemeral vernal lily, Erythronium americanum. Oecologia 67:286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder LD, Cruzan MB, Thomson JD (1993) Unilateral incompatibility and the effects of interspecific pollination for Erythronium americanum and Erythronium albidum (Liliaceae). Can J Bot 71:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines HM, Hendrix SD (2005) Bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) diversity and abundance in tallgrass prairie patches: effects of local and landscape floral resources. Environ Entomol 34:1477–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland PG (1974) The growth, behavior, ecology and geography of Erythronium americanum in Northeast North America. Can J Bot 52:1765–1772

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:83–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG (1999) Pollinators as bioindicators of the state of the environment: species, activity and diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:373–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Greco CF, Belaoussoff S (1997) Log-normality of biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystemic health: pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry heaths. J Appl Ecol 34:1122–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmins JP (2004) Forest ecology: a foundation for sustainable forest management and environmental ethics in forestry, 3rd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner F, Luijten SH, Imbert E et al (2005) Effects of local density on insect visitation and fertilization success in the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). Oikos 111:130–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Buchori D et al (2002) Effects of land-use intensity in tropical agroforestry systems on coffee flower-visiting and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conserv Biol 16:1003–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003a) Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:955–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003b) Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. J Appl Ecol 40:837–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb A (2005) Reduced reproductive success and offspring survival in fragmented populations of the forest herb Phyteuma spicatum. J Ecol 93:1226–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krombein KV, Hurd PD, Smith DR et al (1979) Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico, Volume 2 Apocrita (Aculeata). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1997) Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. J Ecol 85:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe L, Larat S (2006) Annual growth of the spring ephemeral Erythronium americanum as a function of temperature and mycorrhizal status. Can J Bot 84:39–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson M (2005) Higher pollinator effectiveness by specialist than generalist flower-visitors of unspecialized Knautia arvensis (Dipsacaceae). Oecologia 146:394–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leong JM, Thorp RW (1999) Colour-coded sampling: the pan trap colour preferences of oligolectic and nonoligolectic bees associated with a vernal pool plant. Ecol Entomol 24:329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD, Rettenmeyer CW (1956) The ethology of Andrena erythronii with comparative data on other species. Univ Kans Sci Bull 37:645–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Molano-Flores B, Hendrix SD (1999) The effects of population size and density on the reproductive output of Anemone canadensis L. (Ranunculaceae). Int J Plant Sci 160:759–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller RN (1978) The phenology, growth and ecosystem dynamics of Erythronium americanum in the northern hardwood forest. Ecol Monogr 48:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murren CJ (2002) Effects of habitat fragmentation on pollination: pollinators, pollinia viability and reproductive success. J Ecol 90:100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra-Tabla V, Vargas CF, Magana-Rueda S et al (2000) Female and male pollination success of Oncidium ascendens Lindey (Orchidaceae) in two contrasting habitat patches: forest vs agricultural field. Biol Conserv 94:335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Kevan PG, Boone JW (2005) Conservation in pollination: collecting, surveying and monitoring. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge, pp 401–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada M, Stoner KE, Lobo JA et al (2004) Effects of forest fragmentation on pollinator activity and consequences for plant reproductive success and mating patterns in bat-pollinated bombacaceous trees. Biotropica 36:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke BJ, Jules ES (1993) Habitat fragmentation and plant–pollinator interactions. Curr Sci 65:273–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha OJ, Aguilar G (2001) Reproductive biology of the dry forest tree Enterolobium cyclocarpum (Guanacaste) in Costa Rica: a comparison between trees left in pastures and trees in continuous forest. Am J Bot 88:1607–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage TL, Husband BC, Routley MB (2005) Intrinsic attributes of the breeding system. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge, pp 27–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (1999) Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121:432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Tscharntke T (2001) Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 268:1685–1690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C et al (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taki H, Kevan PG (2007) Does habitat loss affect the communities of plants and insects equally in plant–pollinator interaction? Preliminary findings. Biodiver Conserv 16:3147–3161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toler TR, Evans EW, Tepedino VJ (2005) Pan-trapping for bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in Utah’s west desert: the importance of color diversity. Pan-Pac Entomol 81:103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Brandl R (2004) Plant–insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. Annu Rev Entomol 49:405–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer, Now York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waites AR, Agren J (2004) Pollinator visitation, stigmatic pollen loads and among-population variation in seed set in Lythrum salicaria. J Ecol 92:512–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron G (2003) Trees of the Carolinian forest: a guide to species, their ecology and uses. Boston Mills Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 21:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe LM (1983) The effect of plant size on reproductive characteristics in Erythronium americanum (Liliaceae). Can J Bot 61:3489–3493

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Long Point Conservation Authority, M. Armstrong, J. DeCloet and J. Knack for access to the study sites. We also thank B. Viana, F. Silva, J. Trevors and G. Umphrey for discussion, A. Pawlowski, K. Ferguson and R. Barbero for their assistance with the field and laboratory work, A. Manceur and V. MacPhail for their assistance with the field sampling, A. Serafin for supplying plant mesh covering, C. Connell and Q. Shirk-Luckett for GIS support and S. Droege for identifying Lasioglossum (Dialictus) bees. This work was supported by a scholarship from the Rotary Foundation to H. Taki and a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to P.G. Kevan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisatomo Taki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taki, H., Kevan, P.G. & Ascher, J.S. Landscape effects of forest loss in a pollination system. Landscape Ecol 22, 1575–1587 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9153-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9153-z

Keywords

Navigation