Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Community structure and differential responses of aquatic turtles to agriculturally induced habitat fragmentation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies have shown that wetland loss and habitat fragmentation can alter diversity and abundance of herpetofauna, but taxonomic attention has been skewed towards amphibians. We assessed responses of aquatic turtles to features at multiple spatial scales in an intensively farmed region of the Midwestern United States. Spatially hierarchical sampling was conducted from 2001 to 2003 in 35 randomly selected 23-km2 cells throughout the upper Wabash River basin in Indiana. Hoop nets were used at wetlands to capture common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina serpentina) (n=258), midland painted turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata) (151), eastern spiny softshells (Apalone spinifera spinifera) (70), red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) (59), northern map turtles (Graptemys geographica) (27), false map turtles (Graptemys pseudogeographica pseudogeographica) (6), Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) (3), and stinkpot turtles (Sternotherus odoratus) (3). We examined the degree to which these aquatic species were nonrandomly distributed in 14 landscapes. Assemblages of turtles generally were random and the extent of nestedness was influenced by the diversity of landcover, the proportion of grassland, and the total length of roads in each landscape. The occurrence and abundance of several species also were modeled to test hypotheses regarding the importance of site, patch, and landscape-level variables. Red-eared sliders appeared to be most sensitive to habitat fragmentation, whereas painted turtles, snapping turtles, map turtles, and spiny softshells were less affected. Factors at multiple spatial scales affect turtle distributions, suggesting differential responses to landscape fragmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, pp 267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RV, Gutierrez ML, Romano MA (2002) Turtle habitat use in a reach of the upper Mississippi river. J Freshwater Ecol 17:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmar W, Patterson BD (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmar W, Patterson BD (1995) The nestedness temperature calculator: a visual basic program, including 294 presence–absence matrices. AICS Research Incorporate and The Field Museum (http://aics-research.com/nestedness/tempcalc.html)

  • Bodie JR, Semlitsch RD (2000) Spatial and temporal use of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of aquatic turtles. Oecologia 122:138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodie JR, Semlitsch RD, Renken RB (2000) Diversity and structure of turtle assemblages: associations with wetland characters across a floodplain landscape. Ecography 23:444–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagle FR (1939) A system of marking turtles for future identification. Copeia 1939:170–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant R, Collins JT (1998) A field guide to reptiles & amphibians of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner CA, Douthitt BA, Ryan TJ (2005) Descriptive ecology of a turtle assemblage in an urban landscape. Amer Midland Nat 153:428–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC and LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS79/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA, p 103

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RB, Lindenmayer DB (2005) Modeling count data of rare species: some statistical issues. Ecology 86:1135–1142

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (1990) Wetlands: losses in the United States 1780’s to 1980’s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  • DonnerWright DM, Bozek MA, Probst JR, Anderson EM (1999) Responses of turtle assemblages to environmental gradients in the St. Croix River in Minnesota and Wisconsin, U.S.A. Can J Zool 77:989–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreslik MJ, Phillips CA (2005) Turtle communities in the upper Midwest, USA. J Freshwater Ecol 20:149–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay CS, Houlahan J (1997) Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conserv Biol 11:1000–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2002) Treating the nestedness temperature calculator as a “black box” can lead to false conclusions. Oikos 99:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman E, Ray C, Sjögren-Gulve P, Boggs CL, Murphy DD (2002). Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv Biol 16:706–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galat DL, Fredrickson LH, Humberg DD, Bataille KJ, Bodie JR, Dohrenwend J, Gelwicks GT, Havel JE, Helmers DL, Hooker JB, Jones JR, Knowlton MF, Kubisiak J, Mazourek J, McColpin AC, Renken RB, Semlitsch RD (1998) Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. Bioscience 48:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galois P, Léveillé M, Bouthillier L, Daigle C, Parren S (2002) Movement patterns, activity, and home range of the eastern spiny softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera) in Northern Lake Champlain, Québec, Vermont. J Herpetol 36:402–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons JW (1970) Terrestrial activity and the population dynamics of aquatic turtles. Amer Midland Nat 83:404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP, Steen DA (2005) Trends in sex ratios of turtles in the United States: implications of road mortality. Conserv Biol 19:552–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu W, Swihart RK (2004) Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biol Conserv 116:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman MR (1994) Avian use of restored and natural wetlands in north-central Indiana. M.S. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, pp 100

  • Haxton T (2000) Road mortality of snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina, in central Ontario during their nesting period. Can Field Nat 114:106–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlahan JE, Findlay CS (2004) Estimating the ‘critical’ distance at which adjacent land-use degrades wetland water and sediment quality. Landscape Ecol 19:677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CM, Johnson LB, Richards C, Beasley V (2002) Predicting the occurrence of amphibians: an assessment of multiple-scale models. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp RA, Matthews KR, Preisler HK, Jellison R (2003) Developing probabilistic models to predict amphibian site occupancy in a patchy landscape. Ecol Appl 13:1069–1082

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolozsvary MB, Swihart RK (1999) Habitat fragmentation and the distribution of amphibians: patch and landscape correlates in farmland. Can J Zool 77:1288–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert D (1992) Zero Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman PV, Scott AF (2001) Over three decades of persistence of a small and apparently isolated population of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) in a Kentucky reservoir. Chelonian Conserv Biol 4:206–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovich JE (1995) Turtles. In: LaRoe ET, Farris GS, Puckett CE, Doran PD, Mac MJ (eds) Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey, Washington, DC, USA, p 902

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Knutson MG, Franklin AD (2003) Estimating site occupancy, colonization and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84:2200–2207

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand MN, Litvaitis JA (2004) Effects of habitat features and landscape composition on the population structure of a common aquatic turtle in a region undergoing rapid development. Conserv Biol 18:758–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC and Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps (http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/ fragstats.html)

  • Minton SA Jr (2001) Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. The Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JC, Klemens MW (2000) Primary and secondary effects of habitat alteration. In: Klemens MW (ed) Turtle conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp 5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll D, Moll EO (2004) The ecology, exploitation, and conservation of river turtles. Oxford University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll EO, Moll D (2000) Conservation of river turtles. In: Klemens MW (ed) Turtle conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp 126–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit KE, Bishop CA, Brooks RJ (1995) Home range and movements of the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina serpentina, in a coastal wetland of Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario, Canada. Can Field Nat 109:192–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Pluto TG, Bellis ED (1988) Seasonal and annual movements of riverine map turtles, Graptemys geographica. J Herpetol 22:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe JW (2003) Activity and movements of midland painted turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata) living in a small marsh system on Beaver Island, Michigan. J Herpetol 37:342–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe JW, Moll EO (1991) A radiotelemetric study of activity and movements of the Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingi) in northeastern Illinois. J Herpetol 25: 178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell KR, Guynn DC Jr, Hanlin HG (2002) Importance of small isolated wetlands for herpetofaunal diversity in managed, young growth forests in the Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Forest Ecol Manag 163:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker NH, Ernst T, White D, Baker J, Haggerty P (2004) Projecting wildlife responses to alternative future landscapes in Oregon’s Willamette basin. Ecol Appl 14: 381–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (1998) Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conserv Biol 12:1113–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton OJ (1959) Spatial and temporal movements of a population of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta marginata (Agassiz). Ecol Monogr 29:113–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen DA, Gibbs JP (2004) Effects of roads on the structure of freshwater turtle populations. Conserv Biol 18:1143–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone PA, Hauge JB, Scott AF, Guyer C, Dobie JL (1993) Temporal changes in two turtle assemblages. J Herpetol 27:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Slade NA (2004) Modeling interactions of private ownership and biological diversity: an architecture for landscapes with sharp edges. In: Swihart RK, Moore JE (eds) Conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: model-based planning tools. Purdue University Press, Lafayette, Indiana, USA, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Gehring TM, Kolozsvary MB, Nupp TE (2003) Responses of ‘resistant’ vertebrates to habitat loss and fragmentation: the importance of niche breadth and range boundaries. Div Distribut 9:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RK Swihart JJ Lusk JE Duchamp CE Rizkalla JE Moore (2006) ArticleTitleThe roles of landscape context, niche breadth, and range boundaries in predicting species responses to habitat alteration Div Distribut 12 277–287 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00242.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, O’Neill RV, Gardner RH, Milne BT (1989) Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 3:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh AH, Cunningham RB, Donnelly CF, Lindenmayer DB (1996) Modelling the abundance of rare species: statistical models for counts with extra zeros. Ecol Model 88:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyrauch SL, Grubb TC Jr (2004) Patch and landscape characteristics associated with the distribution of woodland amphibians in an agricultural fragmented landscape: an information-theoretic approach. Biol Conserv 115:443–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White D, Minotti PG, Barczak MJ, Sifneos JC, Freemark KE, Santelmann MV, Steinitz CF, Kiester AR, Preston EM (1997) Assessing risks to biodiversity from future landscape change. Conserv Biol 11:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright DH, Patterson BD, Mikkelson GM, Cutler A, Atmar W (1998) A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia 113:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 195 Marsteller Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Carol E. Rizkalla & Robert K. Swihart

Authors
  1. Carol E. Rizkalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert K. Swihart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol E. Rizkalla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizkalla, C.E., Swihart, R.K. Community structure and differential responses of aquatic turtles to agriculturally induced habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecol 21, 1361–1375 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-0019-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-0019-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation