Abstract
With return times between 20 and 100 years, ice storms are a primary disturbance type for temperate forests of eastern North America. Many studies have been conducted at the forest patch and plot scales to examine relations between damage and variables describing site, composition and structure. This paper presents results from a landscape scale study of fragmentation relations with damage in eastern Ontario forests. Data previously collected for two independent and spatially non-overlapping patch level damage studies were used. A Generalized Linear Model (GLM) was used to analyse relations between damage and fragmentation metrics representing patch isolation, edge density, and the relative size and distribution of patches in the landscape. The metrics were applied using spatial extents of 1 × 1 km and 4 × 4 km, following analyses of the variability of numbers of patches and of the lacunarity of forest patterns over a range of extents. The results showed that patch isolation, as measured by the mean Euclidean distance between patches (ENN) was significantly related to damage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Allain M. Cloitre (1991) ArticleTitleCharacterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets Phys. Rev. 44 3552–3558 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevA.44.3552
L.P. Bruederle F.W. Stearns (1985) ArticleTitleIce storm damage to a southern Wisconsin mesic forest Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 112 167–175 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2996413
Butson C. and King D.J. 2005. Lacunarity analysis to determine optimum extents for sample-based spatial information extraction from high-resolution forest imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. (in press).
Charbonneau N.C. 2003. Influence of canopy cover and landscape structure on proportion of alien and shade-intolerant plant species in forest sites. M.Sc. Thesis Department of Biology Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
M.R.T. Dale (2000) ArticleTitleLacunarity analysis of spatial pattern: A comparison Landscape Ecol. 15 467–478 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008176601940
Environment Canada. 1998. The worst ice storm in Canadian history. http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/media/icestorm98/icestorm98_the_worst_e.cfm.
D.R. Foster D.H. Knight J.F. Franklin (1998) ArticleTitleLandscape patterns and legacies resulting from largeinfrequent forest disturbances Ecosystems 1 497–510 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900046
R.J. Hauer M.C. Hruska J.O. Dawson (1994) Trees and Ice Storms: The Development of Ice Storms – Resistant Urban Tree Populations. Special Publication 94–1 Department of Forestry, Univesrity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana IL 12
J.A.G. Jaeger (2000) ArticleTitleLandscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation Landscape Ecol. 15 115–130 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008129329289
D.J. King I. Olthof P.K.E. Pellikka E.D. Seed C. Butson (2005) ArticleTitleModelling and mapping forest ice storm damage using remote sensing and environmental data Nat. Hazards 35 321–342 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s11069-004-1795-4
R.A. Lautenschlager C. Nielsen (1999) ArticleTitleOntario’s forest science efforts following the 1998 ice storm Forest. Chronicle 75 633–641
P.C. Lemon (1961) ArticleTitleForest ecology of ice storms Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 88 21–29 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2482410
McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C. and Ene E. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
A.A. Millward C.E. Kraft (2004) ArticleTitlePhysical influences of landscape on a large-extent ecological disturbance: the northeastern North American ice storm of 1998 Landscape Ecol. 19 99–111 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:LAND.0000018369.41798.2f
I. Olthof D.J. King R.A. Lautenschlager (2004) ArticleTitleMapping deciduous forest ice storm damage using Landsat and environmental data Remote Sens. Environ. 89 484–496 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.010
P. Pellikka E.D. Seed D.J. King (2000) ArticleTitleModelling deciduous forest ice storm damage using aerial CIR imagery and hemispheric photography Can. J. Remote Sens. 26 394–405
R.E. Plotnick R.H. Gardner R.V. O’Neill (1993) ArticleTitleLacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture Landscape Ecol. 8 201–211 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00125351
O.J. Proulx D.F. Greene (2001) ArticleTitleThe relationship between ice thickness and northern hardwood tree damage during ice storms Can. J. Forest Res. 31 1758–1767 Occurrence Handle10.1139/cjfr-31-10-1758
A.G. Rhoads S.P. Hamburg S.P. Fahey T.J. Siccama T.G. Hane E.N. Battles J. Cogbill C.J. Randall G. Wilson (2002) ArticleTitleEffects of an intense ice storm on the structure of a northern hardwood forest Can. J. Forest Res. 32 1763–1775 Occurrence Handle10.1139/x02-089
K.T. Smith W.C. Shortle (1998) Will Winter Storm Injury Affect Hardwood Quality and Maple Sap Production Ice Storm 1998, Information Sheet #2 Northeastern Research Station, USDA Forest Service Durham, NH 2
W.H. Smith (1998) ArticleTitleRelation to disease and decay, In Irland L.C.: Ice Storm 1998 and the forests of the Northeast J. Forest 96 32–40
M.G. Turner (1989) ArticleTitleLandscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20 171–197 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131
M.G. Turner V.H. Dale (1998) ArticleTitleComparing large infrequent disturbances: what have we learned? Ecosystems 1 493–496 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900045
Van Dyke O.R.P.F. Landmark Consulting. 1999. A Literature Review of Ice Storm Impacts on Forests in Eastern North America. SCSS Technical Report #112.
Wear D.N. and Greis J.G. 2002. The Southern Forest Resource Assessment Summary Report. http://www.srs.fs.fed.us/sustain/report/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pasher, J., King, D.J. Landscape Fragmentation and Ice Storm Damage in Eastern Ontario Forests. Landscape Ecol 21, 477–483 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5244-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5244-x