Abstract
Reflecting on the other papers in this special issue, this synopsis characterises some essential trends in European Landscape Ecology, including the challenges it is facing in society. It describes the various perspectives on the ‘contents’ of landscape that are currently being practiced, and especially considers the notion of ‘environment’ as something intrinsic to human activity. Landscape classification and typology are discussed in their potential but limited use for landscape science. The specificity of the European approach appears to be related to the large diversity of cultural landscapes, currently losing their functional ties with the land-use systems that had formed them. European landscape research reports show a large commitment to this decreasing diversity, a dedication characterised by a strong sense of ‘loss and grief’. On the other hand, it is concluded that European landscape research has a specific niche with a clear focus on applied landscape studies explicitly including people’s perceptions and images, as well as the participation of the public and stakeholders. Since globalisation tends to reinforce the detachment of people from their environment; an increased effort is needed to compensate for this effect, and therefore the consideration of the various dimensions of the landscape is today more pertinent than ever. Meeting the challenges of present landscapes, in the face of new multifunctional demands in old diverse landscapes, requires more than before the combination of various perspectives and methods, and of various scales of application, in order to design innovative and adaptive paths for the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 2000. (4th ed.), Houghton Mifflin Company.
Bastian O., Krönert R. and Lipský Z. 2006. Landscape diagnosis in different space and time scales, a challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecol., this issue
J. Brandt H. Vejre (Eds) (2004) Multifunctional Landscapes. Vol. I: Theory, Values and History WIT Press UK
Buijs A., Pedroli B. and Luginbühl Y. 2006. From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: Changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape Ecol., this issue.
M. Bürgi A.M. Hersperger N. Schneeberger (2004) ArticleTitleDriving forces of landscape change – current and new directions Landscape Ecol 19 857–868 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10980-004-0245-8
InstitutionalAuthorNameCouncil of Europe (2000) European Landscape Convention T-Land (2000) 6 Council of Europe Strasbourg
W. Cronon (Eds) (1996) Uncommon Ground. Rethinking the Human Place in Nature W.W. Norton & Company Ltd New York
G.C. Daily (Eds) (1997) Nature’s Services. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems Island Press Washington
De Groot R.S. 2006. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use onflicts in planning for sustainablemulti-functional landscapes. Landscape & Urban Planning, in press.
Groom G., Mücher C.A., Ihse M. and Wrbka Th. 2006. Remote sensing in landscape ecology: experiences and perspectives in a European context. Landscape Ecol., this issue.
R. Hobbs (1997) ArticleTitleFuture landscapes and the future of landscape ecology Landscape Urban Plan. 37 1–9
W. Jackson J.K. Piper (1989) ArticleTitleThe Necessary Marriage between Ecology and Agriculture Ecology 70 IssueID6 1591–1593
Jongman R.H.G., Bunce G.H., Metzger M.J., Mücher C.A., Howard D.C. and Mateus V. 2006. Objectives and applications of a statistical environmental stratification of Europe. Landscape Ecol., this issue.
J. Klijn W. Vos (Eds) (2000) From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science Kluwer Academic Publishers London
J.I. Nassauer R.C. Corry (2004) ArticleTitleUsing normative scenarios in landscape ecology Landscape Ecol 19 343–356
OECD 2002. Proceedings of the Norway/OECD Expert Meeting on Agricultural Landscape Indicators 7–9 Oct., Oslo.
Palang H., Printsmann A., Konkoly Gyuró E., Urbanc M. and Skowronek E. Woloszyn W. 2006. The forgotten rural landscapes of central and eastern Europe. Landscape Ecol., this issue.
B. Pedroli G. Blust ParticleDe K. Looy ParticleVan S. Rooij ParticleVan (2002) ArticleTitleSetting targets in strategies for river restoration Landscape Ecol. 17 IssueID(Suppl. 1) 5–18
Pinto-Correia T., Gustavsson R. and Pirnat J. 2006. Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions. Towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management. Landscape Ecol., this issue.
Swaffield S. and Primdahl J. 2006. Spatial concepts in landscape analysis and policy: some implications of globalisation. Landscape Ecol., this issue.
G. Tress B. Tress G. Fry (2004) ArticleTitleClarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology Landscape Ecol 20 479–493
Wascher D.M. European Landscape Character Areas – Typologies, Cartography and Indicators for the Assessment of Sustainable Landscapes (Ed) 2005. Final Project Report as deliverable from the EU’s Accompanying Measure project European Landscape Character Assessment Initiative (ELCAI), funded under the 5th Framework Programme on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (4.2.2), 210 pp. Landscape EuropeWageningen.
J. Wu R. Hobbs (2002) ArticleTitleKey issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis Landscape Ecol 17 355–365
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pedroli, B., Pinto-Correia, T. & Cornish, P. Landscape – What’s in it? Trends in European Landscape Science and Priority Themes for Concerted Research. Landscape Ecol 21, 421–430 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5204-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5204-5