Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship between Environmental Amenities and Changing Human Settlement Patterns between 1980 and 2000 in the Midwestern USA

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural resource amenities may be an attractor as people decide where they will live and invest in property. In the American Midwest these amenities range from lakes to forests to pastoral landscapes, depending on the ecological province. We used simple linear regression models to test the hypotheses that physiographic, land cover (composition and spatial pattern), forest characteristics, land use on undeveloped land, public ownership, soil productivity and proximity to urban centers predict changes in population, housing, and seasonal housing densities over a 10-year interval (1980–1990). We then generated multiple-regression models to predict population, total and seasonal housing density change in the most recent decade (1990–2000) based on ownership and ecological conditions in 1990 and tested them by comparing the predictions to actual change measured by the US Census Bureau. Our results indicate that the independent variables explained between 25 and 40% of the variability in population density change, 42–67% of the variability of total housing density change, and 13–32% of the variability in seasonal housing density change in the 1980s, depending on the province. The strength of the relationships between independent and dependent variables varied by province, and in some cases the sign varied as well. Topographic relief was significantly related to population growth in all provinces, and land cover composition and the presence of water was significantly related to total housing growth in all provinces. There was a surprisingly limited association of any of the independent variables to seasonal housing growth in the northern province, which is commonly perceived to attract seasonal use because of ecological amenities. Proximity to urban centers is related to population and housing density change, but not seasonal housing density change. Our tests indicated that models for population density change showed some utility, but the models for total and seasonal housing density generally performed poorly. Ecologic variables were consistently poor at predicting seasonal housing density change. Our results show that environmental characteristics appear to have some influence on the spatial distribution of population and housing change in the Midwest, although other factors that were not modeled are clearly dominant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. Ahn A.J. Plantinga R.J. Alig (2000) ArticleTitlePredicting future forestland area: a comparison of econometric approaches Forest Sci. 46 363–376

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Anselin (1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston, MAUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Anselin S. Rey (1991) ArticleTitleProperties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models Geogr. Anal. 23 112–131

    Google Scholar 

  • T.C. Bailey A.C. Gatrell (1995) Interactive Spatial Data Analysis Longman Limited Essex, England

    Google Scholar 

  • M.G. Boarnet (1998) ArticleTitleSpillovers and the locational effects of public infrastructure J. Region. Sci. 38 381–400 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0022-4146.00099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Burridge (1980) ArticleTitleOn the Cliff-Ord test for spatial autocorrelation J. R. Stat. Soc. B 42 107–108

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Carlino L. Mills (1996) ArticleTitleTesting neoclassical convergence in regional incomes and earnings Region. Sci. Urban Econ. 26 565–590 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0166-0462(96)02137-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.C. Deller T.-H. Sue Tsai D.W. Marcouiller D. English (2001) ArticleTitleThe role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth Am. J. Agric. Econ. 83 352–365 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0002-9092.00161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Dent M.J. Blackie (1979) Systems simulation in agriculture Applied Science Publishers Ltd. London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • M.-J. Fortin (1999) Spatial statistics in landscape ecology J.M Klopatek R.H. Gardner (Eds) Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications Springer-Verlag New York, USA 253–279

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Foster (1992) ArticleTitleLand-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New EnglandUSA J. Ecol. 80 753–772

    Google Scholar 

  • G.V. Fuguitt D.L. Brown (1990) ArticleTitleResidential preferences and population redistribution: 1972–1998 Demography 27 589–600 Occurrence Handle2249747

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • G.V. Fuguitt J. J. Zuiches (1975) ArticleTitleResidential preferences and population redistribution Demography 12 491–504 Occurrence Handle1164943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Gobster R.G. Haight D. Shriner (2000) ArticleTitleLandscape change in the Midwest: an integrated research and development program J. Forest. 98 IssueID3 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Griffith (1996) Introduction: the need for spatial statistics S.L. Arlinghaus D.A. Griffith W.C. Arlinghaus W.D. Drake J.D. Nystuen (Eds) Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics CRC Press New York, USA 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Gustafson (1998) ArticleTitleQuantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1 143–156 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer R.B, Voss P.R. and Radelo V.C. 2002. Sub-County Spatial Patterns of Residential Development from 1940–1990 in Wisconsin’s North Woods. University of Wisconsin Center for Demography and Ecology, Working Paper 2002–13.

  • R.B. Hammer S.I. Stewart R. Winkler V.C. Radeloff P.R. Voss (2004) ArticleTitleCharacterizing spatial and temporal residential density patterns across the US Midwest1940–1990 Landscape Urban Plan. 69 183–199 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Henry D.L. Barkley S. Bao (1997) ArticleTitleThe hinterland's stake in metropolitan growth: evidence from selected southern regions J. Region. Sci. 37 479–501 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0022-4146.00065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Henry B Schmitt V. Piguet (2001) ArticleTitleSpatial econometric models for simultaneous systems: application to rural community growth in France Int. Region. Sci. Rev. 24 171–193 Occurrence Handle10.1177/016001701761013169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.M. Johnson G.V. Fuguitt (2000) ArticleTitleContinuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950–1995 Rural Sociol. 65 27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Keys SuffixJr. C. Carpenter S. Hooks F. Koenig W.H. McNab W. Russell M.L. Smith (1995) Ecological Units of the Eastern United States: First Approximation USDA Forest Service Southern Region, AtlantaGeorgiaUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lee D.W.S. Wong (2001) Statistical Analysis with ArcView GIS John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. LeSage (1997) ArticleTitleRegression analysis of spatial data J. Region. Anal. Policy 27 83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Li J.F. Reynolds (1993) ArticleTitleA new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes Landscape Ecol. 8 155–162 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00125347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Long A. Nucci (1997) ArticleTitleThe Hoover Index of population concentration: a correction and update Environ. Plan. A 49 431–440

    Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Marcouiller R. Kedzior J.G. Clendenning (2002) ArticleTitleNatural amenity-led development and rural planning J. Plan. Lit. 16 515–542 Occurrence Handle10.1177/088541202400903572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. McGarigal B.J. Marks (1995) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure USDA Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research Station PortlandOregon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C. and Ene E. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Published on URL server: http://www.-umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.

  • McGranahan D.A. 1999. Natural Amenities Drive Rural Population Change. USDA Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report 781, Washington, DC, USA. McGranahan D.A. and Beale C.L. 2002. Understanding rural population loss. Rural Am. 17: 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. McGranahan C.L. Beale (2002) ArticleTitleUnderstanding rural population loss Rural Am. 17 2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Mendenhall T. Sincich (1989) A Second Course in Business Statistics: Regression Analysis Dellen Publishing Co San FranciscoCA 864

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall W. and Sincich T. 1989. A Second Course in Business Statistics: Regression Analysis. Dellen Publishing Co, San Francisco, CA, 864pp.

  • V.C. Radeloff R.B. Hammer P.R. Voss A.E. Hagen D.R. Field D.J. Mladenoff (2001) ArticleTitleHuman demographic trends and landscape level forest management in the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens Forest Sci. 47 229–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Radelo V.C., Hammer R.B. and Stewart S.I. in press. Sprawl and forest fragmentation in theUSMidwest from 1940 to 2000. Conserv. Biol.

  • S.J. Rey B.D. Montouri (1999) ArticleTitleUS regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective Regional Stud. 33 143–156 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00343409950122945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Ripple G.A. Bradshaw T.A. Spies (1991) ArticleTitleMeasuring landscape pattern in the Cascade Range of Oregon USA Biol. Conserv. 57 73–88 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(91)90108-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Schnaiberg J. Riera M.G. Turner P.R. Voss (2002) ArticleTitleExplaining human settlement patterns in a recreational lake district: Vilas County, Wisconsin, USA Environ. Manage. 30 24–34 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00267-002-2450-z Occurrence Handle12053237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • W.E. Shands R.G. Healy (1977) The Lands Nobody Wanted The Conservation Foundation Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • K.S. So P.F. Orazem D.M. Otto (2001) ArticleTitleThe effects of housing prices, wages, and commuting time on joint residential and job location choices Am. J. Agric. Econ. 83 1036–1048 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0002-9092.00228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.I. Stewart D.J. Stynes (1994) ArticleTitleToward a dynamic model of complex tourism choices: the seasonal home location decision J. Travel Tourism Market. 3 69–88 Occurrence Handle10.1300/J073v03n03_05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Tobler (1970) ArticleTitleA computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region Econ. Geogr. 46 234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUS Department of Agriculture (1994) State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data base: data use information USDA Natural Resource Conservation ServiceNational Soil Survey Center Misc. Pub. 1492. Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUSGS (1990) Digital elevation models: US Geological Survey Data User's Guide 5 US Geological Survey Reston, VirginiaUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Vogelmann S.M. Howard L. Yang C.R. Larson B.K. Wylie N. Van Driel (2001) ArticleTitleCompletion of the 1990s national land cover data set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources Photogr. Eng. Remote Sens. 67 650–662

    Google Scholar 

  • D.N. Wear P. Bolstad (1998) ArticleTitleLand-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes: spatial analysis and forecast evaluation Ecosystems 1 575–594 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900052

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 5985 Highway K, 54501, Rhinelander, WI, USA

    Eric J. Gustafson & Robert S. Potts

  2. Applied Population Laboratory, Department of Rural Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, Madison, WI, USA

    Roger B. Hammer

  3. Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, Madison, WI, USA

    Volker C. Radeloff

Authors
  1. Eric J. Gustafson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger B. Hammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Volker C. Radeloff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert S. Potts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Gustafson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gustafson, E., Hammer, R., Radeloff, V. et al. The Relationship between Environmental Amenities and Changing Human Settlement Patterns between 1980 and 2000 in the Midwestern USA. Landscape Ecol 20, 773–789 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-2149-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-2149-7

Key words:

Search

Navigation