Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationships of landscape, prey and agronomic variables to the abundance of generalist predators in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fields

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-year field study investigated the possible effects of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) and uncultivated areas on the abundance of generalist predators in commercially-managed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fields in Texas, USA. From 63 to 70 fields were sampled for pests and predators over nine consecutive weeks during early stages of cotton development. Additional data on agronomic practices and landscape composition at three spatial scales were also collected for each field. Stepwise regression analyses were used to determine the relationships of landscape, agronomic and prey variables to the abundance of generalist predators. Because the variables most closely linked to predator levels could vary over time, separate regressions were conducted for three time periods corresponding to stages of grain sorghum growth (half-bloom, hard-dough, maturity) in each year. Significant relationships between predator abundance and agricultural landscape composition appear in both years and in all three time periods, but the specific relationships of landscape variables to cotton predator levels differed between and within years. At maturity in 2001, predator levels rose as the amount of uncultivated land from 1.6 to 3.2 km distant and the perimeter shared with grain sorghum increased. During 2002, the area of grain sorghum (half-bloom) and uncultivated land (hard-dough) within 1.6 km of cotton fields were both positively related to predator numbers. Cotton planting dates and the abundance of cotton fleahoppers (Pseudatomoscelis seriatus [Reuter]) were also strongly linked to predator numbers during both years. Results suggest that the total amount of grain sorghum or uncultivated land in an area is more important than the presence of these habitats adjacent to cotton fields, and that landscape composition may sometimes be the most important factor in determining predator abundance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri M.A. and Letourneau D.K. 1982. Vegetation management and biological control in agroecosystems. Crop Protection 1: 405–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andow D.A. 1991a. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annual Review of Entomology 36: 561–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andow D.A. 1991b. Yield loss to arthropods in vegetationally diverse ecosystems. Environmental Entomology 20: 1228–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beets W.C. 1982. Multiple cropping and tropical farming systems. Gower Publishing, Aldershot, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazzle J.R., Heinz K.M. and Parrella M.P. 1997. Multivariate approach to identifying patterns of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infesting cotton. Environmental Entomology 26: 995–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breene R.G., Sterling W.L. and Dean D.A. 1989. Predators of the cotton fleahopper on cotton. Southwestern Entomologist 14: 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott N.C., Kieckhefer R.W., Lee J.H. and French B.W. 1999. Influence of within-field and landscape factors on aphid predator populations in wheat. Landscape Ecology 14: 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott N.C., Kieckhefer R.W. and Beck D.A. 2002a. Effect of aphids and the surrounding landscape on the abundance of Coccinellidae in cornfields. Biological Control 24: 214–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott N.C., Kieckhefer R.W., Michels G.J. and Giles K.L. 2002b. Predator abundance in alfalfa fields in relation to aphids, within-field vegetation, and landscape matrix. Environmental Entomology 31: 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fye R. E. 1972. The interchange of insect parasites and predators between crops. PANS 18: 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fye R.E. and Carranza R.L. 1972. Movement of insect predators from grain sorghum to cotton. Environmental Entomology 6: 790–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hietala-Koivu R. 2002. Landscape and modernizing agriculture: a case study of three areas in Finland in 1954 – 1998. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 91: 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandel Scientific. 1995. SigmaScan Image Analysis software: changes and enhancements through release 2.0. SPSS Science, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis D.A., Wratten S.D. and Gurr G.M. 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 175–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15: 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez E.G. and Teetes G.L. 1976. Selected predators of aphids in grain sorghum and their relation to cotton. Journal of Economic Entomology 69: 198–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • MapInfo Corporation. 2000. MapInfo Professional User’s Guide, Version 6.0. Troy, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menalled F.D., Marino P.C., Gage S.H. and Landis D.A. 1999. Does agricultural landscape structure affect parasitism and parasitoid diversity? Ecological Applications 9: 634–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel J.L. 1973. Pest situations in changing agricultural systems—a review. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 19: 136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostman O., Ekbom B. and Bengtsson J. 2001a. Landscape heterogeneity and farming practice influence biological control. Basic and Applied Ecology 2: 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostman O., Ekbom B., Bengtsson J. and Weibull A.C. 2001b. Landscape complexity and farming practice influence the condition of polyphagous carabid beetles. Ecological Applications 11: 480–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka E.R. 1994. Evolutionary ecology, p. 26. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasifka J.R., Krauter P.C., Heinz K.M., Sansone C.G. and Minzenmayer R.R. 1999. Predator conservation in cotton: Using grain sorghum as a source for insect predators. Biological Control 16: 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasifka J.R., Heinz K.M. and Sansone C.G. 2003. Timing, magnitude, rates and putative causes of predator movement between cotton and grain sorghum fields. Environmental Entomology 33: 282–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabb R.L., Stinner R.E. and van den Bosch R. 1976. Conservation and augmentation of natural enemies. In: Huffaker C.B. and Messenger P.S. (eds), Theory and Practice of Biological Control, pp. 233–254. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root R.B. 1973. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats - fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs 43: 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansone C. G. and Smith J.W. 2001. Natural mortality of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in short-season cotton. Environmental Entomology 30: 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slosser J.E., Pinchak W.E. and Rummel D.R. 1998. Biotic and abiotic regulation of Aphis gossypii Glover in West Texas dryland cotton. Southwestern Entomologist 23: 31–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. 2000. SPSS Base 10.0 Brief Guide. Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies C. and Tscharntke T. 1999. Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285: 893–895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlip R.L. 1993. How a sorghum plant develops. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Contribution No. 1203, Kansas State University, Kansas, USA. 19 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin M. Heinz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prasifka, J.R., Heinz, K.M. & Minzenmayer, R.R. Relationships of landscape, prey and agronomic variables to the abundance of generalist predators in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fields. Landscape Ecol 19, 709–717 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-0279-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-0279-7

Key words

Navigation