Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Importance of Spatial Scale for Conservation and Assessment of Anuran Populations in Coastal Wetlands of the Western Great Lakes, USA

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distributions of pond-breeding amphibians may be influenced by habitat factors at different spatial scales. We used anuran calling surveys to investigate the association between 5 anuran species and habitat variables measured within 100, 500, 1000, and 3000 m of sampling points at 63 coastal wetlands along the US shores of Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. Stepwise logistic regression was used to create predictive models for each species at each spatial scale. Our results confirm the view that habitat variables at multiple scales influence frog distributions, but the strength of predictive models was significantly affected by the spatial scale at which habitat variables were derived. Remotely sensed habitat variables within a 3000 m radius were among the most effective predictors of occurrence for American toad (Bufo americanus), eastern gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor), spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer), and green frog (Rana clamitans melanota). The western chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata) was predicted most effectively by variables derived within a 500 m radius. For the most part, these anurans exhibited species-specific responses to habitat variables; however the suite of landscape-scale variables associated with urban land use appeared in all species’ regression models. Associations with landscape-scale variables coupled with well-documented habitat needs at local breeding sites suggest that conservation and assessment of frogs and toads in coastal wetlands should consider the influence of habitat variables at multiple spatial scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E.P. Ashley J.T. Robinson (1996) ArticleTitleRoad mortality of amphibians, reptiles and other wildlife on the Long Point causeway, Lake ErieOntario Can. Field-Nat. 110 403–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey R.G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. USDA Forest. Service Website. Available online at: http//www.fs.fed.us/land/ecosysmgmt/ecoreg1_home.html.

  • T.J.C. Beebee (1985) ArticleTitleDiscriminant analysis of amphibian habitat determinants in South-East England Amphibia-Reptilia 6 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Bendel A.A. Afifi (1977) ArticleTitleComparison of stopping rules in forward regression J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 72 46–53

    Google Scholar 

  • K.A. Berven T.A. Grudzien (1990) ArticleTitleDispersal of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure Evolution 44 2047–2056

    Google Scholar 

  • T.R. Bosley (1978) ArticleTitleLoss of wetlands on the west shore of Green Bay Trans. Wisconsin Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 66 235–245

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Bradley (1968) Distribution-free Statistical Tests Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Brazner (1997) ArticleTitleRegional, habitatand human development influences on coastal wetland and beach fish assemblages in Green Bay, Lake Michigan J. Great Lakes Res. 23 36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Brazner D.A. Jensen (1999) ArticleTitleZebra mussel [Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas)] colonization of rusty crayfish [Orconectes rusticus (Girard)] in Green Bay, Lake Michigan Am. Midland Nat. 143 250–256

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Brown A. Kodric-Brown (1977) ArticleTitleTurnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction Ecology 58 445–449

    Google Scholar 

  • L.W. Carr L. Fahrig (2001) ArticleTitleEffect of road traffic on two amphibian species of differing vagility Conserv. Biol. 15 1071–1078 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041071.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.S. Casper (1996) Geographic Distributions of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Wisconsin Milwaukee Public MuseumInc. MilwaukeeUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Collins H.M. Wilbur (1979) ArticleTitleBreeding habits and habitats of the amphibians of the Edwin S. George ReserveMichigan, with notes on the local distribution of fishes Occas. Pap. Museum Zool. Univ. Michigan 686 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • M.C. Costanza A.A. Afifi (1979) ArticleTitleComparison of stopping rules in forward stepwise discriminant analysis J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74 777–785

    Google Scholar 

  • W.W. Daniel (1990) Applied Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd ed PWS-Kent Publishing Company Boston, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Danz N., Regal R., Niemi G.J., Brady V.J., Hollenhorst T., Johnson L.B., Host G.E., Hanowski J.M., Johnston C.A., Brown T., Kingston J. and Kelly J.R. Environmentally stratified sampling design for the development of Great Lakes environmental indicators. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, in press.

  • P.G. deMaynadier M.L. Hunter SuffixJr. (1999) ArticleTitleForest canopy closure and juvenile emigration by pool-breeding amphibians in Maine J. Wildlife Manage. 63 441–450

    Google Scholar 

  • C.K. Dodd B.S. Cade (1998) ArticleTitleMovement patterns and the conservation of amphibians breeding in small, temporary wetlands Conserv. Biol. 12 331–339 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97183.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.K. Dodd L.L. Smith (2003) Habitat destruction and alteration: historical trends and future prospects for amphibians R.D. Semlitsch (Eds) Amphibian Conservation Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC, USA 94–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge D. and Kavetsky R. 1995. Aquatic habitat and wetlands of the Great Lakes. SOLEC working paper presented at State of the Great Lakes Ecosystem ConferenceChicago IL.

  • ERDAS 1999. ERDAS Field Guide: Version 8.5. 5th ed. ERDAS Inc., AtlantaGeorgiaUSA.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameEnvironment Canada (1995) State of the Great Lakes 1995 Environment Canada OttawaON

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI, Environmental Systems Research InstituteInc. 1996. ArcView GIS: The Geographic Information System for Everyone. Environmental Systems Research InstituteInc., Redlands, California.

  • L. Fahrig J.H. Pedlar S.E. Pope P.D. Taylor J.F. Wegner (1995) ArticleTitleEffect of road traffic on amphibian density Biol. Conserv. 73 177–182 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(94)00102-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.S. Findlay J. Houlahan (1997) ArticleTitleAnthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands Conserv. Biol. 11 1000–1009 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96144.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Gibbons (2003) ArticleTitleTerrestrial habitat: a vital component for herpetofauna of isolated wetlands Wetlands 23 630–635

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Gibbs (1998) ArticleTitleDistribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient Landscape Ecol. 13 263–268 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008056424692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.E. Gill (1978) ArticleTitleThe metapopulation ecology of the red-spotted newtNotopht halmus viridescens (Rafinesque) Ecol. Monogr. 48 145–166

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Glooschenko W.F. Weller P.G.R. Smith R. Alvo J.H.G. Archbold (1992) ArticleTitleAmphibian distribution with respect to pond water chemistry near Sudbury, Ontario Can. J. Fish. Aqua. Sci. 49 114–121

    Google Scholar 

  • GraphPad Software Inc. 2003. GraphPad Prism 4. GraphPad Software Inc., San DiegoCA.

  • A.D. Guerry M.L. Hunter SuffixJr. (2002) ArticleTitleAmphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: an examination of landscape composition and configuration Conserv. Biol. 16 745–754 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00557.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Hanski D. Simberloff (1997) The metapopulation approach: its history, conceptual domain and application to conservation I.A Hanski M.E. Gilpin (Eds) Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution Academic Press San DiegoCA 5–25

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Harding (1997) Amphibians and Reptiles of the Great Lakes Region The University of Michigan Press Ann ArborUSA

    Google Scholar 

  • H.J. Harris G. Fewless M. Milligan W. Johnson (1981) Recovery processes and habitat quality in a freshwater coastal marsh following a natural disturbance B. Richardson (Eds) Selected Proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Wetland Values and Management Freshwater Society NavarreMNUSA 363–379

    Google Scholar 

  • H.C. Hartman (1990) ArticleTitleClimate change impacts of Laurentian Great Lake levels Clim. Change 17 49–67 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00149000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecnar S.J. 2004. Great Lakes wetlands as amphibian habitats: a review. Aqua. Ecosyst. Health Manage. 7: 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Hecnar R.T. M’Closkey (1996) ArticleTitleAmphibian species richness and distribution in relation to pond water chemistry in southwestern OntarioCanada Freshwater Biol. 36 7–15 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.1996.00054.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Hecnar R.T. M’Closkey (1997) ArticleTitleSpatial scale and determination of species status of the green frog Conserv. Biol. 11 670–682 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96096.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Hecnar R.T. M’Closkey (1998) ArticleTitleSpecies richness patterns of amphibians in southwestern Ontario ponds J. Biogeogr. 25 763–772 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540763.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Hensher L.W. Johnson (1981) Applied Discrete Choice Modeling Halsted Press New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • S.P. Hitchings T.J.C. Beebee (1997) ArticleTitleGenetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation Heredity 79 117–127 Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.hdy.6882010 Occurrence Handle9279008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Hosmer S. Lemeshow (1989) Applied Logistic Regression John Wiley and Sons New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Johnson L.B. Johnson C. Richards V. Beasley (2002) Predicting the occurrence of amphibians: an assessment of multiple-scale models J. Scott P.J. Heglund M.L. Morrison (Eds) Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale Island Press Washington, DC, USA 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Joly C. Miaud A. Lehmann O. Grolet (2001) ArticleTitleHabitat matrix effects on pond occupancy in newts Conserv. Biol. 15 239–248 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99200.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Karr (1981) ArticleTitleAssessment of biotic integrity using fish communities Fisheries 6 21–27 Occurrence Handle10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Keough T. Thompson G. Gunternspergen D.A. Wilcox (1999) ArticleTitleHydrogeomorphic factors and ecosystem responses in coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes Wetlands 19 821–834

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Klute M.J. Lovallo W.M. Tzilkowski (2002) Autologistic regression modeling of American Woodcock habitat use with spatially dependent data J. Scott P.J. Heglund M.L. Morrison (Eds) Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale Island Press Washington, DC, USA 335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • M.G. Knutson J.R. Sauer D.A. Olsen M.J. Mossman L.M. Hemesath M.J. Lannoo (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA Conserv. Biol. 13 1437–1446 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98445.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.B. Kolozsvary R.K. Swihart (1999) ArticleTitleHabitat fragmentation and the distribution of amphibians: patch and landscape correlates in farmland Can. J. Zool. 77 1288–1299 Occurrence Handle10.1139/cjz-77-8-1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Kramer (1973) ArticleTitleMovements of western chorus frogs Pseudacris triseriata tagged with Co60 J. Herpetol. 7 231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • S.P. Lawler D. Dritz T. Strange M. Holyoak (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of introduced mosquitofish and bullfrogs on the threatened California red-legged frog Conserv. Biol. 13 613–622 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98075.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Lehtinen S.M. Galatowitsch J.R. Tester (1999) ArticleTitleConsequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages Wetlands 19 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Marsh P.C. Trenham (2001) ArticleTitleMetapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation Conserv. Biol. 15 40–49 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00129.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard L. and Wilcox D. 1997. Coastal wetlands. Available online at: www.epa.gov/glnop/solec/96/coastal/cw-.pdf.

  • W.J. Mitsch J.G. Gosselink (2000) Wetlands, 3rd ed John Wiley and Sons NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison M.A. and Hall L.S. 2002. Standard terminology: toward a common language to advance ecological under- standing and application. In: Scott J., Heglund P.J. and Morrison M.L. (eds), Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 43–52.

  • M.A. Morrison L.S. Hall (2002) Standard terminology: toward a common language to advance ecological understanding and application J. Scott P.J. Heglund M.L. Morrison (Eds) Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale Island Press Washington, DC, USA 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • L.D. Mortsch (1998) ArticleTitleAssessing the impact of climate change on the Great Lakes shoreline wetlands Climate Change 40 391–416 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005445709728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Munger M. Gerger K. Madrid M. Carroll W. Petersen L. Herberger (1998) ArticleTitleU.S. National wetland inventory classifications as predictors of the occurrence of Columbia Spotted Frogs (Rana luteiventris) and Pacific Treefrogs (Hyla regilla) Conserv. Biol. 12 320–330 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97012.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nature Conservancy 1994. The conservation of biological diversity in the Great Lakes ecosystem: issues and opportunities. The Nature Conservancy Great Lakes ProgramChicago IL, USA.

  • NOAANational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2002. Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory. Available online at: http://www.lerl.noaa.gov/data/now/wlevels/.

  • R.S. Oldham (1966) ArticleTitleSpring movement of the American toadBufo americanus Can. J. Zool. 44 63–100

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Pavignano C. Giacoma S. Castellano (1990) ArticleTitleA multivariate analysis of amphibian habitat determinants in north western Italy Amphibia-Reptilia 11 311–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentecost E.D. and Vogt R.C. 1976. Amphibians and reptiles of the Lake Michigan Drainage Basin. Environmental Status of the Lake Michigan Drainage Basin, Vol. 16. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL

  • N. Perret R. Pradel C. Miaud O. Grolet P. Joly (2003) ArticleTitleTransiencedispersal and survival rates in newt patchy populations J. Animal Ecol. 72 567–575 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00726.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.E. Pope L. Fahrig H.G. Merriam (2000) ArticleTitleLandscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations Ecology 8 2498–2508

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Reh A. Seitz (1990) ArticleTitleThe influence of land use on the genetic structure of populations of the common frog Rana temporaria Biol. Conserv. 54 239–249 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(90)90054-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.O. Richter A.L. Azous (1995) ArticleTitleAmphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound Basin Wetlands 15 305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • B.B. Rothermel R.D. Semlitsch (2002) ArticleTitleAn experimental investigation of landscape resistance of forest versus old-field habitats to emigrating juvenile amphibians Conserv. Biol. 16 1324–1332 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01085.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameSAS Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. (1999) SAS Version 8 Statistical Analysis System InstituteInc. Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • E.E. Schroeder (1976) ArticleTitleDispersal and movement of newly-transformed green frogs, Rana clamitans Am. Midland Nat. 95 471–474

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Semlitsch (1988) ArticleTitleAllotopic distribution of two salamanders, effects of fish predation and competitive interactions Copeia 1988 290–298

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Semlitsch (1998) ArticleTitleBiological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond breeding salamanders Conserv. Biol. 12 1113–1119 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97274.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Semlitsch (2000) ArticleTitlePrinciples for management of aquatic breeding amphibians J. Wildlife Manage. 64 615–631

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Semlitsch J.R. Bodie (1998) ArticleTitleAre small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conserv. Biol. 12 1129–1133 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.98166.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Semlitsch J.R. Bodie (2003) ArticleTitleBiological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles Conserv. Biol. 17 1219–1228 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02177.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Shannon W. Weaver (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication University of Illinois Press UrbanaIL

    Google Scholar 

  • T.P. Simon (2003) Biological Response Signatures: Indicator Patterns using Aquatic Communities CRC Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Sinsch (1990) ArticleTitleMigration and orientation of anuran amphibians Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2 65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Sjögren (1991) ArticleTitleExtinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the cases of the pool frog (Rana lessonae) Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42 135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Sjögren-Gulve C. Ray (1996) Using logistic regression to model metapopulation dynamics: large-scale forestry extirpates the pool frog D.R. McCullough (Eds) Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation Island Press Washington D.C. USA 111–137

    Google Scholar 

  • D.K. Skelly E.E. Werner S.A. Cortwright (1999) ArticleTitleLong-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan Amphibian Assemblage Ecology 80 2326–2337

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Squire R.A. Newman (2002) ArticleTitleFine-scale population structure in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) in a northern woodland Herpetologica 58 119–130

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey. 2002. National Land Cover Classification. Available online at: http://landcover.sgs.gov/natllandcover.html.

  • R.C. Vogt (1981) Natural History of Amphibians and Reptiles in Wisconsin Milwaukee Public Museum MilwaukeeWI

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeber R.C. and Vallianatos M. 2000. The Marsh Monitoring Program, 1995–1999: Monitoring Great Lakes Wetlands and their amphibian inhabitants. Available online at: http:// www.sc-eoc.org/library.html.

  • T.H. Whillans (1979) ArticleTitleHistoric transformations of fish communities in three Great Lakes Bays J. Great Lakes Res. 5 195–215

    Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Wright A.A. Wright (1949) The Handbook of Frogs and Toads Comstock Publishing Inc IthacaNew York, US

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Howe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, S., Marks, D., Howe, R. et al. The Importance of Spatial Scale for Conservation and Assessment of Anuran Populations in Coastal Wetlands of the Western Great Lakes, USA. Landscape Ecol 20, 441–454 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-3167-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-3167-6

Keywords

Navigation