Abstract
This paper outlines how the viable systems model (VSM) can provide insights into a National System of Innovation by focussing on the necessary variety needed to match the system's changing external environment. Because an innovation system is more diffuse than a firm, the VSM needs to be described within an ‘ecological’ metaphor. This approach gives insights into the system's learning processes, showing that there can be a trade-off between variety and control for the system to maintain a fixed level of viability. Furthermore, for many innovation systemsthe coordination is ‘soft’; taking place through markets, through Government directions, and through relationships embodied in clusters, unions or industry groups, etc.Governments generally can only manage the system indirectly by facilitating the generation of the necessary variety, influencing strategic directions, filling gaps in the system and encouraging coordination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R. (1994). Systems thinking and thinking systems. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 10, 175–188.
Ackoff, R., and Gharajedaghi, J. (1966). Reflections on systems and their models. Syst. Res. 13, 13–23.
Andersen, E. S. (1992). Approaching national systems of innovation from the production and linkage structure. In Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter: London, pp. 68–92.
Andersen, E. S., and Braendgaard, A. (1992). Integration, innovation and evolution. In Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive learning, Pinter: London, pp. 241–264.
Arthur, W. B., Holland, J. B., Le Baron, B., Palmer, R., and Tayler, P. (eds.). (1997). Asset Pricing Under Endogenous Expectations in an Artificial Stock Market, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
Ashby, W. R. (1964). Introduction to Cybernetics, University Paperbacks: London.
Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the Firm, Allan Lane: Harmondsworth.
Beer, S. (1979). The Heart of Enterprise, Wiley: Chichester.
Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the Firm (2nd edn.), John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 35, 7–25.
Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organisations, Wiley: Chichester.
Bititci, U. S., Turner, T. J., and Ball, P. D. (1999). The viable business structure of managing agility. Int. J. Agile Manag. Syst. 1, 190.
Blackmore, S. J. (1999). The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Brocklesby, J., and Cummings, S. (1996). Designing a viable organization structure. Long Range Plann. 29, 49–57.
Brocklesby, J., Cummings, S., and Davies, J. (1995). Demystifying the viable systems model as a tool for organisational analysis. Asia-Pac. J. Operat. Res. 12, 65–86.
Bryant, K., and Well, A. W. (1999). A New Economic Paradigm? Innovation-based Evolutionary Systems, Department of Industry Science & Resources: Australia.
Carlsson, B., and Jacobsson, S. (1997). Diversity creation and technological systems: A technology policy perspective. In Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter: London, pp. 266–290.
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., and Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Res. Pol. 31, 233–245.
Cohendet, P., and Llerena, P. (1997). Learning, technical change, and public policy: How to create and exploit diversity. In Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter: London, pp. 223–241.
Coriat, B., and Weinstein, O. (2002). Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation. Res. Pol. 31, 273–290.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Dosi, G., Marsili, O., Orsenigo, L., and Salvatore, R. (1995). Learning, market selection and the evolution of industrial structures. Small Bus. Econ. 7, 411–436.
Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches—Their emergence and characteristics. In Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter: London, pp. 1–35.
Edquist, C. (2001a). The systems of innovation approach and innovation policy: An account of the state of the art. Druid Nelson and Winter Conference 2001, Aalborg University: Denmark.
Edquist, C., Hommen, L., and McKelvey, M. (2001b). Innovation and Employment, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.
Espejo, R. (1989). The VSM revisited. In Espejo, R., and Harnden, R. (eds.), The Viable Systems Model—Interpretations and Applications of the VSM, Wiley: Chichester, pp. 77–100.
Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving, Wiley: Chichester.
Fransman, M. (1990). The Market and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press: New York.
Johnson, B. (1992). Institutional learning. National Systems of Innovation, Pinter: London.
Johnson, B., and Gregersen, B. (1995). System of innovation and economic integration. J. Ind. Stud. 2, 1–18.
Leonard, A. (2000). The viable systems model and knowledge management. Kybernetes 29, 710–715.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive learning, Pinter: London.
Lundvall, B.-A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., and Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Res. Pol. 31, 213–231.
McKelvey, M. (1997). Using evolutionary theory to define systems of innovation. In Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter: London and Washington, pp. 200–222.
Metcalfe, J. S. (1998). Evolutionary Concepts in Relation to Evolutionary Economics, Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester, UK.
Miller, J. G. (1978). Living Systems, McGraw-Hill: New York.
Montobbio, F. (1999). National innovation systems. A critical survey. ESSY working paper, ESSY No 2.
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Nelson, R. R., and Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Res. Pol. 31, 265–272.
OECD (1997). National Innovation Systems, OECD publications: Paris.
OECD (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems, OECD publications: Paris.
Patel, P., and Pavitt, K. (1994). The Nature and Economic Importance of National innovation Systems, OECD: Paris.
Saviotti, P. P. (1997). Innovation systems and evolutionary theories. In Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter: London, pp. 180–197.
Saviotti, P. P. (2001). Networks, national innovation systems and self-organisation. In Fischer, F., and Frohlich, J. (eds.), Knowledge, Complexity and Innovation Systems, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, pp. 21–45.
Teubal, M. (2002). What is the systems perspective to innovation and technology policy (ITP) and how can we apply it to developing and newly industrialized economies? J. Evol. Econ. 12, 233–257.
Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning, P. Haupt: Berne.
Verspagen, B. (2000). Economic Growth and Technological Change: An Evolutionary Interpretation, ECIS & MERIT: Maastricht.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science 111, 23–29.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory. Foundations, Development, Applications, George Braziller: New York.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or, Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Wiley: New York.
Williams, M. B. (1973). The logical status of the theory of natural selection and other evolutionary controversies. In Bunge, M. (ed.), The Methodological Unity of Science, D. Reidel: Dordrecht.
Ziman, J. (2000). Evolutionary models for technical change. In Ziman, J. (ed.), Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Societal or cultural innovations, such as new forms of citizen participation in decision-making, may well improve the viability of an innovation system. However, if these innovations are pursued for societal rather than economic purposes, they fall outside the usual definition of innovation within an NSI.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Devine, S. The Viable Systems Model Applied to a National System of Innovation to Inform Policy Development. Syst Pract Act Res 18, 491–517 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-8485-y
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-8485-y