Abstract
College students and police investigators watched or listened to 10 prison inmates confessing to crimes. Half the confessions were true accounts; half were false—concocted for the study. Consistent with much recent research, students were generally more accurate than police, and accuracy rates were higher among those presented with audiotaped than videotaped confessions. In addition, investigators were significantly more confident in their judgments and also prone to judge confessors guilty. To determine if police accuracy would increase if this guilty response bias were neutralized, participants in a second experiment were specifically informed that half the confessions were true and half were false. This manipulation eliminated the investigator response bias, but it did not increase accuracy or lower confidence. These findings are discussed for what they imply about the post-interrogation risks to innocent suspects who confess.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., Ansfield, M. E., Tickle, J. J., & Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 67–89.
Bull, R. (1989). Can training enhance the detection of deception? In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 83–99). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bull, R., & Milne, R. (2004). Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 182–196). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Hunsaker, F. G. (1991). Interpersonal deception. II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58, 25–40.
Davis, D., & O’Donohue, W. (2003). The road to perdition: “Extreme influence” tactics in the interrogation room. In W. O’Donohue, P. Laws, & C. Hollin (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology. New York: Basic Books.
DePaulo, B. M. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans learn to do better? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83–86.
DePaulo, B. M., Lassiter, G. D., & Stone, J. I. (1982). Attentional determinants of success at detecting deception and truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 273–279.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–112.
DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–267.
Drizin, S. A., & Colgan, B. A. (2001). Let the cameras roll: Mandatory videotaping of interrogations is the solution to Illinois’ problem of false confessions. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 32, 337–424.
Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1007.
Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.
Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263–266.
Garrido, E., & Masip, J. (1999). How good are police officers at spotting lies? Forensic Update, 58, 14–21.
Garrido, E., Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2004). Police officers’ credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 254–275.
Granhag, P.-A., & Strömwall, L. (Eds.) (2004). The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions, and testimony. London: Wiley.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Andersson, L. O. (2004). Suspicious minds: Criminals’ ability to detect deception. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 83–95.
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2004). Police officers’ lie detection accuracy: Interrogating freely vs. observing video. Police Quarterly, 7, 429–456.
Hilgendorf, E. L., & Irving, M. (1981). A decision-making model of confessions. In M. Lloyd-Bostock (Ed.), Psychology in legal contexts: Applications and limitations (pp. 67–84). London: MacMillan.
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.
Kassin, S. M. (2002). False confessions and the jogger case. The New York Times, November 1, 2002, p. A-31.
Kassin, S. M. (2004). Videotape police interrogations. The Boston Globe, OP-ED, April 26, 2004, p. A-13.
Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). “I’m Innocent”: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499–516.
Kassin, S. M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the “fundamental difference” hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 469–484.
Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the “harmless error” rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27–46.
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133–146.
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1985). Confession evidence. In S. M. Kassin & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedure (pp. 67–94). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Koehnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work? Social Behavior, 2, 1–17.
Lassiter, G. D. (Ed.) (2004). Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A., Handley, I., Weiland, P., & Munhall, P. (2002). Videotaped confessions and interrogations: A simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 867–874.
Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Munhall, P. J., Handley, I. M., & Beers, M. J. (2001). Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 189–254.
Leo, R. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266–303.
Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 429–496.
Malone, B. E., Adams, R. B., Anderson, D. E., Ansfield, M., & DePaulo, B. M. (1997). Strategies of deception and their correlates over the course of friendship. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137–149.
Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E., & Anton, C. (in press). Generalized Communicative Suspicion (GCS) among police officers: Accounting for the investigator bias effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469–480.
Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2004). “You’re guilty, so just confess” Cognitive and behavioral confirmation biases in the interrogation room. In D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. London: Jossey-Bass.
Morgenthau, R. (2002). New York v. Wise, Richardson, McCray, Salaam, & Santana: Affirmation in Response to Motion to Vacate Judgment of Conviction. Indictment No. 4762/89.
Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643–658.
Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 141–156.
Saulny, S. (2002). Why confess to what you didn’t do? The New York Times, December 8, 2002, Section 4.
Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence. New York: Doubleday.
Slobogin, C. (2003). Toward taping. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 1, 309–322.
Vrij, A. (1994). The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117–132.
Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. London: Wiley.
Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001). Who killed my relative? Police officers’ ability to detect real life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 7, 119–132.
Wrightsman, L. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1993). Confessions in the courtroom. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1967, June). The psychology of police confessions. Psychology Today, 1, 17–20, 25–27.
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 1–59.
Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Alton, A. O. (1984). Learning to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 519–528.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Kassin, S.M., Meissner, C.A. & Norwick, R.J. “I’d Know a False Confession if I Saw One”: A Comparative Study of College Students and Police Investigators. Law Hum Behav 29, 211–227 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2416-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2416-9