Abstract
Forensic evaluations must systematically assess malingering and related response styles. In the criminal forensic domain, competency to stand trial evaluations are the most common referrals. Effective screens for feigned incompetency would be valuable assets for forensic evaluations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST) as a screen for feigned incompetency. Using a simulation design, the MFAST was tested on jail and competency-restoration samples. Most notably, recommended MFAST cut score (≥6) was useful for the identification of feigning cases in competency evaluations. Recommendations for forensic practice, including the advantages and disadvantages of systematic screens, are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, R. M., & Howard, A. (1984). Expert testimony on malingering: The admissibility of clinical procedures for the detection of deception. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 5–19.
Baldessarini, R. J., Finklestein, S., & Arana, G. W. (1983). The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 569–573.
Beaber, R. J., Marston, A., Michelli, J., & Mills, M. J. (1985). A brief test for measuring malingering in schizophrenic individuals. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 1478–1481.
Bonnie, R. J., & Grisso, T. (2000). Adjudicative competency and youthful offenders. In T. Grisso & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 73–103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Christensen, R., & Grace, G. (1999). The prevalence of low literacy in an indigent psychiatric population. Psychiatric Services, 50, 262–263.
Cornell, D. G., & Hawk, G. L. (1989). Clinical presentation of malingerers diagnosed by experienced forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 374–383.
Gothard, S., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1995). Feigning incompetency to stand trial: An investigation of the Georgia Court Competency Test. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 363–373.
Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Kwartner, P. (2003, August). Diagnosis-specific malingering on the MFAST: Cut scores and strategies. Presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Toronto, ON.
Miller, H. A. (2001). MFAST: Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Resnick, P. J. (1984). The detection of malingered mental illness. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 21–38.
Rogers, R. (1990). Development of a new classificatory model of malingering. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 18, 323–333.
Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Rogers, R., & Cruise, K. R. (1998). Assessment of malingering with simulation designs: Threats to external validity. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 273–285.
Rogers, R., Harrell, E. H., & Liff, C. D. (1993). Feigning neuropsychological impairment: A critical review of methodologies and clinical considerations. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 255–274.
Rogers, R., Salekin, R. T., Sewell, K. W., Goldstein, A., & Leonard, K. (1998). A comparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: A prototypical analysis of explanatory models. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 353–367.
Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E., & Sewell, K. W. (in press). Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial-Revised (ECST-R) and professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Smith, G. P. (1997). Assessment of malingering with self-report measures. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 351–372). New York: The Guilford Press.
Smith, G. P., & Burger, G. K. (1997). Detection of malingering: Validation of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25, 183–189.
Spitzer, R. L., & Endicott, J. (1978). Schedule of affective disorders and schizophrenia-change version (SADS-C). New York: Biometrics Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, R.L., Rogers, R. & Sewell, K.W. Forensic Applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): Screening for Feigned Disorders in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations. Law Hum Behav 29, 199–210 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2193-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2193-5