Abstract
The gasification/combustion kinetics of a typical Chinese high-ash-fusion-temperature (AFT) coal char, Huainan (HN) coal char, are analyzed using a thermogravimetric analyzer in this paper. The carbon conversion rate and the gasification/combustion reaction rate characteristics of HN coal char are studied. The initial gasification/combustion reaction rates are also analyzed in this paper. Results show that at 1300 °C, the gasification and combustion processes are changed from the chemical reaction control zone to the pore diffusion control zone. Thus, 1300 °C is recommended as the gasification temperature of the non-slagging EFGs system using high-AFT HN coal. Based on the isothermal method, a complementary method of iso-conversional and model based is used to analyze the gasification and combustion kinetics of HN coal char. The gasification/combustion reaction order m and activation energy E of HN coal char are obtained by iso-conversional method. The kinetic model equation f(α) is obtained based on a modified master plot method. The kinetic exponent n and the pre-exponential factor k0 are obtained by model-based method. The results of this work provide the useful data for designing the non-slagging EFGs using high-AFT coals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sripada PP, Xu T, Kibria MA, Bhattacharya S. Comparison of entrained flow gasification behaviour of Victorian brown coal and biomass. Fuel. 2017;203:942–53.
Collot A-G. Matching gasification technologies to coal properties. Int J Coal Geol. 2006;65(3):191–212.
Tremel A, Stemann J, Herrmann M, Erlach B, Spliethoff H. Entrained flow gasification of biocoal from hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel. 2012;102(6):396–403.
Ball M, Wietschel M. The hydrogen economy: opportunities and challenges. Cambridge University Press. 2009;4:66–7.
Xiao-Jiang WU, Zhang ZX, Gui-Lin P, Nobusuke K, Shigekatsu M, Yoshinori I. Gasification characteristics of coal with high ash fusion temperature in lab-scale down-flow gasifier. J Combust Sci Technol. 2009;15:182–6.
Xiao-Jiang WU, Zhang ZX, Gui-Lin P, Nobusuke K, Shigekatsu M, Yoshinori I. Experimental study on gasification reaction characteristics of chinese high ash fusion temperature coal with CO2 and steam at elevated temperature. Proc CSEE. 2007;27(32):24–8.
Liu H, Luo C, Masaomi T, Shigeyuki U, Toshinori K. Kinetics of CO2/char gasification at elevated temperatures. Part II: clarification of mechanism through modelling and char characterization. Fuel Process Technol. 2006;87(9):769–74.
Liu H, Luo C, Kato S, Uemiya S, Kaneko M, Kojima T. Kinetics of CO2/Char gasification at elevated temperatures: part I: experimental results. Fuel Process Technol. 2006;87(9):775–81.
Kajitani S, Suzuki N, Ashizawa M, Hara S. CO2 gasification rate analysis of coal char in entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel. 2006;85(2):163–9.
Kajitani S, Hara S, Matsuda H. Gasification rate analysis of coal char with a pressurized drop tube furnace. Fuel. 2002;81(5):539–46.
Vyazovkin S, Wight C. Isothermal and non-isothermal kinetics of thermally stimulated reactions of solids. Int Rev Phys Chem. 1998;17(3):407–33.
Anca-Couce A, Berger A, Zobel N. How to determine consistent biomass pyrolysis kinetics in a parallel reaction scheme. Fuel. 2014;123:230–40.
Ozawa T. A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1965;38(11):1881–6.
Flynn JH, Wall LA. A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Lett. 1966;4(5):323–8.
Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anall Chem. 1957;29(11):1702–6.
Coats AW, Redfern JP. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature. 1964;201(491):68–9.
Coats AW, Redfern JP. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Lett. 1965;3:917–20.
Khawam A, Flanagan DR. Complementary use of model-free and modelistic methods in the analysis of solid-state kinetics. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109(20):10073–80.
Gotor FJ, Criado JM, Malek J, Koga N. Kinetic analysis of solid-state reactions: the universality of master plots for analyzing isothermal and nonisothermal experiments. J Phys Chem A. 2000;104(46):10777–82.
Chen DD, Jiang XG, Lv S, Ma ZY, Yan JH, Yu XH, et al. Thermal treatment of Indonesian lignite washery tailing Part 2. Kinetic analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123(2):1735–42.
Chen DD, Jiang XG, Lv S, Ma ZY, Yan JH, Yu XH, et al. Thermal treatment of Indonesian lignite washery tailing Part 1. Experimental. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123(2):1727–33.
Xiao H-m, Ma X-q, Lai Z-y. Isoconversional kinetic analysis of co-combustion of sewage sludge with straw and coal. Appl Energy. 2009;86(9):1741–5.
Wang CA, Liu YH, Zhang XM, Che DF. A study on coal properties and combustion characteristics of blended coals in Northwestern China. Energy Fuels. 2011;25(8):3634–45.
Tomaszewicz M, Tomaszewicz G, Sciazko M. Experimental study on kinetics of coal char–CO2 reaction by means of pressurized thermogravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130(3):2315–30.
Hooshmand P, KhakRah H, Balootaki HK, et al. Recycling municipal solid waste utilizing gasification technology: a case study. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08986-z.
Acknowledgements
Financial supports are acknowledged by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M642137), the Natural Science Foundation of Universities of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 18KJB470015), the Science and Technology Major Project of Anhui Province (Grant No. 15czz02045-4) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Young Scientists of China (Grant No. BK20190708).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, D., Bu, C., Wang, X. et al. Gasification and combustion kinetics of a high-ash-fusion-temperature coal using thermogravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim 143, 3209–3220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09460-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09460-x