Abstract
In the present investigation, asymptotic solutions are obtained regarding the laminar natural convection of a nanofluid in a porous enclosure subject to internal heating and magnetic field, which appears in a plethora of industrial and bioengineering applications. The complicated nature of the nanofluids along with the computational time needed for the magnetohydrodynamic numerical simulations makes this problem too difficult to face with. Hence, the innovation of this study relies on providing a first-principles approach that includes three kinds of widely utilized nanoparticles (Cu, Al2O3 and TiO2) dispersed in aqueous suspension by incorporating a unified way for describing the nanofluid thermal conductivity and viscosity. In addition, the effect of the magnetic field, internal heating, porous medium permeability as well as nanoparticle size and volume fraction is examined via the derived analytical relationships. In brief, the current study suggests that the increase in the magnetic field intensity and the decrease in the medium permeability tend to suppress the nanofluid flow, thus resulting in deterioration of the heat transfer. This deterioration also occurs when the nanofluid becomes denser and the nanoparticles enlarge. Conversely, increasing the internal heating reinforces the convective currents in favor of cooling process. Finally, the present asymptotic solutions are expected to be very useful in various scientific fields given the rapidly growing interest in nanofluids.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- B 0 :
-
Magnitude of the external magnetic field
- C p :
-
Specific heat under constant pressure
- Da:
-
Darcy number
- d f :
-
Equivalent water diameter
- d p :
-
Nanoparticle diameter
- g :
-
Gravity acceleration
- h :
-
Cavity height
- Ha:
-
Hartmann number
- k :
-
Thermal conductivity
- L :
-
Cavity aspect ratio (width/height)
- P :
-
Pressure
- Pr:
-
Prandtl number
- Q :
-
Volumetric heating rate
- Ra:
-
Rayleigh number
- Rep :
-
Reynolds number appearing in relative thermal conductivity
- Rs:
-
Scaled Rayleigh number
- T :
-
Nanofluid temperature
- Τ f :
-
Freezing temperature of water
- u, w :
-
x-, z-velocity components, respectively
- V E :
-
Electrostatic potential
- x, z :
-
Spatial coordinates
- G, y m,o, a m :
-
Functions appeared in asymptotic solutions
- a m,HD :
-
The hydrodynamic limits for am,
- y m,HD :
-
ym, respectively
- α :
-
Thermal diffusivity
- β :
-
Volumetric expansion coefficient
- θ 0 :
-
Analytical core nanofluid temperature
- Κ :
-
Permeability
- Θ, Ψ, Χ, Ζ :
-
Dimensionless temperature, stream function and spatial coordinates, respectively
- μ :
-
Dynamic viscosity
- ν :
-
Kinematic viscosity
- ξ :
-
Scaled horizontal coordinate
- ρ :
-
Density
- σ :
-
Electrical conductivity
- φ :
-
Nanoparticle volume fraction
- ψ :
-
Stream function
- ψ 0 :
-
Core stream function
- ψ i :
-
Stream function of order Li
- av:
-
Average
- f:
-
Fluid
- nf:
-
Nanofluid
References
Choi SUS, Eastman JA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Mater Sci. 1995;231:99–105.
Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Shafee A, Li Z. Nanofluid heat transfer and entropy generation through a heat exchanger considering a new turbulator and CuO nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;134(3):2295–303.
Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA, Li Z, Shafee A, Abbasi FM. Time dependent conduction heat transfer during solidification in a storage system using nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;26(6):2153–69.
Farshad SA, Sheikholeslami M. Simulation of exergy loss of nanomaterial through a solar heat exchanger with insertion of multi-channel twisted tape. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08156-1.
Karvelas E, Liosis C, Benos L, Karakasidis T, Sarris I. Micromixing efficiency of particles in heavy metal removal processes under various inlet conditions. Water. 2019;11(6):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061135.
Benos L, Spyrou LA, Sarris IE. Development of a new theoretical model for blood-CNTs effective thermal conductivity pertaining to hyperthermia therapy of glioblastoma multiform. Comput Prog Biomed. 2019;172:79–85.
Mahian O, Kolsi L, Amani M, Estellé P, Ahmadi G, Kleinstreuer C, Marshall JS, Taylor RA, Abu-Nada E, Rashidi S, Niazmand H, Wongwises S, Hayat T, Kasaeian A, Pop I. Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows-Part II: applications. Phys Rep. 2019;791:1–59.
Rashidi S, Mahian O, Languri EM. Applications of nanofluids in condensing and evaporating systems: a review. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131(3):2027–39.
Pelekasis N, Benos L. Static arrangement of a capillary porous system (CPS): modelling. Fusion Eng Des. 2017;117:180–7.
Nield DA, Bejan A. Convection in porous media. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2006.
Kasaeian A, Azarian RD, Mahian O, Kolsi L, Chamkha AJ, Wongwises S, Pop I. Nanofluid flow and heat transfer in porous media: a review of the latest developments. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;107:778–91.
Menni Y, Chamkha A, Azzi A. Nanofluid transport in porous media: a review, special topics and reviews in porous media. Int J. 2019;10(1):49–64.
Mahdi RA, Mohammed HA, Munisamy KM, Saeid NH. Review of convection heat transfer and fluid flow in porous media with nanofluid. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2015;41:715–34.
Abedini A, Armaghani T, Chamkha AJ. MHD free convection heat transfer of a water–Fe3O4 nanofluid in a baffled C-shaped enclosure. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(1):685–95.
Vo DD, Hedayat M, Ambreen T, Shehzad SA, Sheikholeslami M, Shafee A, Nguyen TK. Effectiveness of various shapes of Al2O3 nanoparticles on the MHD convective heat transportation in porous medium. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08501-4.
Sheikholeslami M, Sajjadi H, Delouei AA, Atashafrooz M, Li Z. Magnetic force and radiation influences on nanofluid transportation through a permeable media considering Al2O3 nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;136(6):2477–85.
Grosan T, Revnic C, Pop I, Ingham DB. Magnetic field and internal heat generation effects on the free convection in a rectangular cavity filled with a porous medium. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:1525–33.
Mahmud S, Fraser RA. Magnetohydrodynamic free convection and entropy generation in a square porous cavity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2004;47:3245–56.
Kakarantzas SC, Benos LTh, Sarris IE, Knaepen B, Grecos AP, Vlachos NS. MHD liquid metal flow and heat transfer between vertical coaxial cylinders under horizontal magnetic field. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2017;65:342–51.
Daniels P, Jones O. Convection in a shallow cavity due to internal heat generation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1998;41:3979–87.
Benos LTh, Kakarantzas SC, Sarris IE, Grecos AP, Vlachos NS. Analytical and numerical study of MHD natural convection in a horizontal shallow cavity with heat generation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2014;75:19–30.
Benos LTh, Sarris IE. Analytical study of the magnetohydrodynamic natural convection of a nanofluid filled horizontal shallow cavity with internal heat generation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;130:862–73.
Sarris IE, Zikos GK, Grecos AP, Vlachos NS. On the limits of validity of the low magnetic Reynolds number approximation in MHD natural convection heat transfer. Numer Heat Transf B-Fund. 2006;50(2):157–80.
Murshed SMS, Estellé P. A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2017;76:1134–52.
Halelfadl S, Estellé P, Aladag B, Doner N, Maré T. Viscosity of carbon nanotubes water based nanofluids: influence of concentration and temperature. Int J Therm Sci. 2013;71:111–7.
Brinkman H. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. Chem Phys. 1952;20:571–81.
Benos LTh, Karvelas EG, Sarris IE. A theoretical model for the magnetohydrodynamic natural convection of a CNT-water nanofluid incorporating a renovated Hamilton–Crosser model. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;135:548–60.
Atashafrooz M. The effects of buoyancy force on mixed convection heat transfer of MHD nanofluid flow and entropy generation in an inclined duct with separation considering Brownian motion effects. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08363-w.
Prasher R, Bhattacharya P, Phelan PE. Thermal conductivity of nanoscale colloidal solutions (nanofluids). Phys Rev Lett. 2005;94:025901.
Koo J, Kleinstreuer C. A new thermal conductivity model for nanofluids. Nanoparticle Res. 2004;6:577–88.
Putnam SA, Cahill DG, Braun PV, Ge Z, Shimmin RG. Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle suspensions. Appl Phys. 2006;99:084308.
Yu W, Choi US. The role of interfacial layers in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a renovated Maxwell model. Nanoparticle Res. 2003;5:167–71.
Xie H, Fujii M, Zhang X. Effect of interfacial nanolayer on the effective thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture. Heat Mass Transf. 2005;48:2926–32.
Pasrija R, Srivastava S. The interfacial layer and the thermal conductivity of nanofluid. Heat Transf Asian Res. 2014;43(3):288–96.
Hamilton RL, Crosser OK. Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two component systems. Ind Eng Chem Fund. 1962;1:187–91.
Jiang H, Xu Q, Huang C, Shi L. The role of interfacial nanolayer in the enhanced thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube-based nanofluids. Appl Phys A-Mater. 2015;118:197–205.
Mahian O, Kolsi L, Amani M, Estellé P, Ahmadi G, Kleinstreuer C, Marshall JS, Siavashi M, Taylor RA, Niazmand H, Wongwises S, Hayat T, Kolanjiyil A, Kasaeian A, Pop I. Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows-Part I: fundamentals and theory. Phys Rep. 2019;790:1–48.
Corcione M. Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energ Convers Manage. 2011;52:789–93.
Khalid A, Khan I, Shafie S. Exact solutions for free convection flow of nanofluids with ramped wall temperature. Eur Phys J. 2015;130:57. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2015-15057-9.
Ashorynejad HR, Sheikholeslami M, Pop I, Ganji DD. Nanofluid flow and heat transfer due to a stretching cylinder in the presence of magnetic field. Heat Mass Transf. 2013;49:427–36.
Çengel YA, Turner RH, Cimbala JM. Fundamentals of thermal-fluid sciences. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.
Benos LTh, Karvelas EG, Sarris IE. Crucial effect of aggregations in CNT-water nanofluid magnetohydrodynamic natural convection. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2019;11:263–71.
Li Y, Suzuki S, Inagaki T, Yamauchi N. Carbon-nanotube nanofluid thermophysical properties and heat transfer by natural convection. J Phys Conf Ser. 2014;557:012051.
Samioti SE, Benos LTh, Sarris IE. Effect of fractal-shaped outer boundary of glioblastoma multiforme on drug delivery. Comput Methods Prog Biol. 2019;178:191–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Derivation of the governing dimensionless equations
The governing system of two-dimensional steady-state, incompressible, MHD equations has been presented in Eqs. (1)–(4). Taking the derivative of Eqs. (2) and (3) with respect to z and x, respectively, and considering the continuity equation, Eq. (1):
Subtracting Eqs. (34) from (33):
The stream function ψ(x, z) is related to velocity components u and v via:
Substituting Eqs. (36) in (35):
Substituting also Eq. (36) in energy equation, namely Eq. (4), it turns out that:
Next, the dimensional form of the stream function and energy equations are derived via considering the following magnitudes:
Thus Eqs. (37) and (38) result in Eqs. (40) and (41), respectively:
where the dimensionless numbers Da, Prnf, Ranf and Hanf have already been defined in Eqs. (15)–(18) of the main part of this study. Besides, X, Z, Θ and Ψ are converted to x, z, T and ψ, respectively, for the sake of simplicity.
Derivation of the ordinary differential equations using the asymptotic expansions method
The governing parameter of the present problem is ε, which can be defined as ε ≡ L−1 ≪ 1, where L is the aspect ratio of the cavity that is very large, as it has already been stressed. The core flow covers most of the cavity and its solution relies on the length scales ξ and z (Eq. 24).
Similarly to [20,21,22], the stream function and the temperature fields are expanded with respect to ξ, z as follows:
These expansions are substituted into the flow and energy equations and their boundary conditions, which have been analyzed in the main part of the study, for the purpose of obtaining a system of coupled partial equations for the stream function and temperature for every order of magnitude of L.
Thus, substituting Eqs. (42), (43) into (40) in terms of ξ and z:
Next, the terms of order one and L−1 are equalized:
Similarly, substituting Eqs. (42), (43) into (41) at order L2, L and 1 it is obtained, respectively, as:
The solution of Eq. (45a) with the adiabatic boundary conditions \(\partial T_{0} /\partial z = 0\) at \(z = \pm 0.5\) is:
where θ0 is a function of ξ, independent of z.
Derivation of the analytical solutions
Following the analysis of [20,21,22], only the stream functions of order one and temperatures of order L2 are going to be analyzed which give a satisfactory picture of the nanofluid flow and heat transfer for the core region. Focusing on Eq. (44b), its complementary equation is:
The general solution of the complementary equation is:
while its particular solution is in the same manner as [20,21,22]:
Substituting the boundary conditions pertaining to ψ0, namely Eqs. (19) and (20) of the main part of the present study, and adding the particular and general solutions:
where
Integrating in z Eq. (45c) and applying the boundary condition \(\left. {\partial T_{2} /\partial z} \right|_{z = \pm 0.5} = 0\), the only consistent solution according to [21, 22] should obey the equation for θ0:
where
Following the analysis of [21], the first integration of Eq. (51) considering the symmetry condition of the solution yields:
where
Moreover, using \(\sinh y_{\text{m}} = \sinh^{ - 1} \left[ {\frac{3}{2}a_{\text{m}}^{1/2} \,{\text{Rs}}_{\text{nf}} \left( {\xi - \frac{1}{2}} \right)} \right]\) with a further integration, a closed-form solution of the core stream function, vertical velocity and temperature is produced (Eqs. (25)–(27), respectively) where \(y_{{{\text{m}},0}} = \sinh^{ - 1} \left( {\frac{3}{4}a_{\text{m}}^{1/2} {\text{Rs}}_{\text{nf}} } \right).\)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benos, L.T., Polychronopoulos, N.D., Mahabaleshwar, U.S. et al. Thermal and flow investigation of MHD natural convection in a nanofluid-saturated porous enclosure: an asymptotic analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim 143, 751–765 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-09165-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-09165-w