Abstract
The pyrolysis kinetic analysis of the three pseudocomponents of biomass, namely cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, were investigated using a thermogravimetric (TG) analyzer. The multi-peaks method was used to fit the Gaussian distribution model of DTG curves. The activation energies of three pseudocomponents pyrolysis were evaluated using sinusoidally modulated temperature method. The results showed that the multi-peaks methods can fit the DTG curves of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin successfully. There was only one reaction stage for the pyrolysis of cellulose and hemicelluloses. There were two reaction stages for the pyrolysis of lignin. The average E was 112.6, 162.8 and 156.8 kJ mol−1 for cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee JW, Hawkins B, Day DM, Reicosky DC. Sustainability: the capacity of smokeless biomass pyrolysis for energy production, global carbon capture and sequestration. Energy Environ Sci. 2010;3(11):1695–705.
Vinu R, Broadbelt LJ. A mechanistic model of fast pyrolysis of glucose-based carbohydrates to predict bio-oil composition. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5(12):9808–26.
Chen T, Liu R, Scott NR. Characterization of energy carriers obtained from the pyrolysis of white ash, switchgrass and corn stover—biochar, syngas and bio-oil. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;142:124–34.
Mahinpey N, Murugan P, Mani T, Raina R. Analysis of bio-oil, biogas, and biochar from pressurized pyrolysis of wheat straw using a tubular reactor. Energy Fuels. 2009;23(5):2736–42.
Bridgwater AV. Principles and practice of biomass fast pyrolysis processes for liquids. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1999;51(1–2):3–22.
Enders A, Hanley K, Whitman T, Joseph S, Lehmann J. Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:644–53.
Kissinger HE. Variation of peak temperature with heating rate in differential thermal analysis. J Res Natl Bur Stand. 1956;57(4):217–21.
Burnham AK, Braun RL. Global kinetic analysis of complex materials. Energy Fuels. 1998;13(1):1–22.
Baroni ÉdG, Tannous K, Rueda-Ordóñez YJ, Tinoco-Navarro LK. The applicability of isoconversional models in estimating the kinetic parameters of biomass pyrolysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;123(2):909–17.
Wang J, Zhao H. Error evaluation on pyrolysis kinetics of sawdust using iso-conversional methods. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;124(3):1635–40.
Cruz G, Crnkovic PM. Investigation into the kinetic behavior of biomass combustion under N2/O2 and CO2/O2 atmospheres. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;123(2):1003–11.
Braun RL, Burnham AK. Analysis of chemical reaction kinetics using a distribution of activation energies and simpler models. Energy Fuels. 1987;1(2):153–61.
Zhou H, Long Y, Meng A, Li Q, Zhang Y. The pyrolysis simulation of five biomass species by hemi-cellulose, cellulose and lignin based on thermogravimetric curves. Thermochim Acta. 2013;566:36–43.
Cai J, Wu W, Liu R. Sensitivity analysis of three-parallel-DAEM-reaction model for describing rice straw pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol. 2013;132:423–6.
Li Z, Zhao W, Meng B, Liu C, Zhu Q, Zhao G. Kinetic study of corn straw pyrolysis: comparison of two different three-pseudocomponent models. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(16):7616–22.
Zhang J, Chen T, Wu J, Wu J. Multi-Gaussian-DAEM-reaction model for thermal decompositions of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: comparison of N2 and CO2 atmosphere. Bioresour Technol. 2014;166:87–95.
Mamleev V, Bourbigot S, Bras ML, Lefevre J. Three model-free methods for calculation of activation energy in TG. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2004;78:1009–27.
Mamleev V, Bourbigot S. Modulated thermogravimetry in analysis of decomposition kinetics. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60(3):747–66.
Mamleev V, Bourbigot S, Le Bras M, Yvon J, Lefebvre J. Model-free method for evaluation of activation energies in modulated thermogravimetry and analysis of cellulose decomposition. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61(4):1276–92.
Chen T, Wu C, Liu R, Fei W, Liu S. Effect of hot vapor filtration on the characterization of bio-oil from rice husks with fast pyrolysis in a fluidized-bed reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(10):6178–85.
Chen T, Deng C, Liu R. Effect of selective condensation on the characterization of bio-oil from pine sawdust fast pyrolysis using a fluidized-bed reactor. Energy Fuels. 2010;24(12):6616–23.
Chen T, Zhang J, Wu J. Kinetic and energy production analysis of pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass using a three-parallel Gaussian reaction model. Bioresour Technol. 2016;211:502–8.
Chen T, Wu J, Zhang J, Wu J, Sun L. Gasification kinetic analysis of the three pseudocomponents of biomass-cellulose, semicellulose and lignin. Bioresour Technol. 2014;153:223–9.
Cai J, Wu W, Liu R, Huber GW. A distributed activation energy model for the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 2013;15(5):1331–40.
Mamleev V, Bourbigot S. Calculation of activation energies using the sinusoidally modulated temperature. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2002;70:565–79.
Cai J, Han D, Chen C, Chen S. Application of the golden section search algorithm in the nonlinear isoconversional calculations to the determination of the activation energy from nonisothermal kinetic conversion data. Solid State Sci. 2010;12(5):829–33.
Ranzi E, Cuoci A, Faravelli T, Frassoldati A, Migliavacca G, Pierucci S, et al. Chemical kinetics of biomass pyrolysis. Energy Fuels. 2008;22(6):4292–300.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51406220) and Shanxi Province Coal-based Key Technology Research and Development Program (Project No. MD 2014-03) is greatly acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, T., Li, L., Zhao, R. et al. Pyrolysis kinetic analysis of the three pseudocomponents of biomass–cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J Therm Anal Calorim 128, 1825–1832 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-6040-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-6040-3