Abstract
A sample consisting of woody biomass and bituminous coal was pyrolyzed in a lab-scale furnace in a nitrogen atmosphere with the temperature increasing by different heating rates of 5, 10, and 50 °C min−1 until the furnace wall temperature reached 900 °C. Five blending ratios (BRs) of coal–biomass were tested. For each BR, the mass loss of the sample and mole fractions of the gaseous species evolved from the sample were measured using a thermogravimetry (TG) and a real-time gas analyzer (GA). Reactivity, product yield, and activation energy were considered as index parameters to co-pyrolysis. While synergy (the difference between the experimental data and calculated results obtained using an additive model) of the reactivity of co-pyrolysis was observed only at specific temperatures, the TG results showed synergy at temperatures between 450 and 500 °C compared to between 450 and 600 °C seen with the GA method for all pyrolyzed gases, and especially between 350 and 650 °C for H2. While there was no synergy in the char yield of the co-pyrolysis, the liquid and total gas exhibited synergy for all three BRs. The pre-exponential factors and the activation energies of BRs of 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 were obtained using a kinetic study of co-pyrolysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stiegel GJ, Maxwell RC. Gasification technologies: the path to clean, affordable energy in the 21st century. Fuel Process Technol. 2001;71:79–97.
Franco A, Diaz AR. The future challenges for clean coal technologies: joining efficiency increase and pollutant emission control. Energy. 2009;34:348–54.
Yuan S, Dai Z, Zhou Z, Chen X, Yu G, Wang F. Rapid co-pyrolysis of rice straw and a bituminous coal in a high-frequency furnace and gasification of the residual char. Bioresour Technol. 2012;109:188–97.
Gao C, Vejahati F, Katalambula H, Gupta R. Co-gasification of biomass with coal and oil sand coke in a drop tube furnace. Energy Fuels. 2010;24:232–40.
Fermoso J, Gil MV, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F. Kinetic models comparison for non-isothermal steam gasification of coal-biomass blend chars. Chem Eng J. 2010;161:276–84.
Long HA, Wang LT. Case studies for biomass/coal co-gasification in IGCC applications. Proceeding of ASME Turbo Expo 2011.
Jones JM, Kubacki M, Kubica K, Ross AB, Williams A. Devolatilisation characteristics of coal and biomass blends. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2005;74:502–11.
Zhang L, Xu S, Zhao W, Liu S. Co-pyrolysis of biomass and coal in a free fall reactor. Fuel. 2007;86:353–9.
Haykiri-Acma H, Yaman S. Synergy in devolatilization characteristics of lignite and hazelnut shell during co-pyrolysis. Fuel. 2007;86:373–80.
Ulloa CA, Gordon AL, Garcia XA. Thermogravimetric study of interactions in the pyrolysis of blends of coal with radiata pine sawdust. Fuel Process Technol. 2009;90:583–90.
Park DK, Kim SD, Lee SH, Lee JG. Co-pyrolysis characteristics of sawdust and coal blend in TGA and a fixed bed reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:6151–6.
Quan C, Xu S, An Y, Liu X. Co-pyrolysis of biomass and coal blend by TG and in a free fall reactor. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:817–23.
Messri C, Moghtaderi B. Lack of synergetic effects in the pyrolytic characteristics of woody biomass/coal blends under low and high heating rate regimes. Biomass Bioenerg. 2002;23:55–66.
Kastanaki E, Vamvuka D, Grammelis P, Kakaras E. Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of lignite–biomass blends during devolatilization. Fuel Process Technol. 2002;77–78:159–66.
Vuthaluru HB. Investigation into the pyrolytic behavior of coal/biomass blends using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2004;92:187–95.
Sutcu H. Pyrolysis by thermogravimetric analysis of blends of peat with coals of different characteristics and biomass. J Chin Inst Chem Eng. 2007;38:245–9.
Sadhukhan AK, Gupta P, Goyal T, Saha RK. Modelling of pyrolysis of coal–biomass blends using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:8022–6.
Masnadi MS, Habibi R, Kopyscinski J, Hill JM, Bi X, Lim CJ, Ellis N, Grace JR. Fuel characterization and co-pyrolysis kinetics of biomass and fossil fuels. Fuel. 2014;117:1204–14.
Guo Z, Bai Z, Bai J, Wang Z, Li W. Synergistic effects during co-pyrolysis and liquefaction of biomass and lignite under syngas. J Therm Anal Calorim: DOI; 2015. doi:10.1007/s10973-014-4277-2.
Han B, Chen Y, Wu Y, Hua D, Chen Z, Feng W, Yang M, Xie Q. Copyrolysis behaviors and kinetics of plastics-biomass blends through thermogravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;115:227–35.
Aboulkas A, Harfi KE. Co-pyrolysis of olive residue with poly (vinyl chloride) using thermogravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;95:1007–13.
Aboulkas A, Harfi KE, Bouadili AE, Nadifiyine M. Study on the pyrolysis of Moroccan oil shale with poly (ethylene terephthalate). J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;100:323–30.
Holstein A, Bassilakis R, Wojtowicz MA, Serio MA. Kinetics of methane and tar evolution during coal pyrolysis. Proc Combust Inst. 2005;30:2177–85.
Doyle CD. Kinetic analysis of thermogravimetric data. J Appl Polym Sci. 1961;5:285–92.
Seo DK, Park SS, Hwang J, Yu TU. Study of the pyrolysis of biomass using thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and concentration measurements of the evolved species. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2010;89:66–73.
Seo DK, Park SS, Kim YT, Hwang J, Yu TU. Study of coal pyrolysis by thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and concentration measurements of the evolved species. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2011;92:209–16.
Perry SW, Chilton CN. Chemical engineers handbook. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1973.
Asuero AG, Gonzalez G. Fitting straight lines with replicated observations by linear regression. III. Weighting data. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2007;37:143–72.
Senneca O. Kinetics of pyrolysis, combustion and gasification of three biomass fuels. Fuel Process Technol. 2007;88:87–97.
Borah D, Barua M, Baruah MK. Dependence of pyrite concentration on kinetics and thermodynamics of coal pyrolysis in non-isothermal systems. Fuel Process Technol. 2005;86:977–93.
Otero M, Calvo LF, Gil MV, Garcia AI, Moran A. Co-combustion of different sewage sludge and coal: a non-isothermal thermogravimetric kinetic analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2008;9:6311–9.
Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Criado JM, Perez-Maqueda LA, Popescu C, Sbirrazzuoli N. ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochim Acta. 2011;520:1–19.
Blazej A, Kosik M. Phytomass: a raw material for chemistry and biotechnology. Bratislava: Ellis Horwood, series; 1993.
Smith LH, Smoot LD, Fletcher TH. The structure and reaction process of coal. New York: Plenum Press; 1994.
Solomon PR, Fletcher TH, Pugmire RJ. Progress in coal pyrolysis. Fuel. 1993;72:587–97.
Li C, Suzuki K. Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification—an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2009;13:594–604.
Li CZ, Sathe C, Kershaw JR, Pang Y. Fates and roles of alkali and alkaline earth metals during the pyrolysis of a Victorian brown coal. Fuel. 2000;79:427–38.
Shenqi X, Zhijie Z, Jie X, Guangsuo Y, Fuchen W. Effects of alkaline metal on coal gasification at pyrolysis and gasification phases. Fuel. 2011;90:1723–30.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Converged Energy Materials Research Center (CEMRC) of the Republic of Korea. The authors gratefully acknowledge this support (NE-31).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeong, H.J., Seo, D.K., Park, S.S. et al. A comprehensive study on co-pyrolysis of bituminous coal and pine sawdust using TG . J Therm Anal Calorim 120, 1867–1875 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4470-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4470-y