Abstract
This article presents a comparative thermodynamic analysis based on numerical methods for a hybrid refrigeration system suitable to operate as vapour absorption system (VA), vapour compression–absorption system (VCA) and vapour compression system (VC). The working fluid employed for the first two systems is ammonia–water and it is pure ammonia in case of the third system. The system is being powered by waste energy and conventional energy depending on the mode of operation. The effect on performance parameters like COP and exergy efficiency during all modes of operation has been evaluated by keeping the uniform parametric conditions like condenser temperature (40 °C) and evaporator temperature (5 °C) for all the modes of operation. The effect of ambient temperature on the exergy loss in each component of the different modes of operation have also been evaluated and discussed. The results obtained indicate that COP and exergy efficiency for VCA mode initially increases and then decreases whereas for VA and VC mode the COP and exergy efficiency decreases with condenser temperature. The analysis also reveals that with the variation in evaporator temperature the COP and exergy efficiency for VC mode increases whilst for VA and VCA mode the COP shows a slight increase whereas exergy efficiency decreases. The variation of exergy efficiency and exergy loss in different components with condenser and evaporator temperature shows that exergy efficiency is found to be the highest in VC mode whereas the lowest in VCA mode for both the temperature variations. The variation of compressor work and exergy loss in compressors with evaporator and condenser temperature shows that compressor work and exergy loss is lesser for VCA mode when compared to VC mode.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \( \dot{m} \) :
-
Mass flow rate (kg s−1)
- h :
-
Enthalpy (kJ kg−1)
- s :
-
Entropy (kJ kg−1 K−1)
- \( \dot{Q} \) :
-
Heat flow (kJ s−1)
- p :
-
Pressure (bar)
- T :
-
Temperature (°C or K)
- \( \dot{W} \) :
-
Power consumption (kJ s−1)
- Ex:
-
Exergy (kJ s−1)
- 1–12:
-
Different state points in a system
- PR-valve:
-
Pressure reducing valve
- EES:
-
Engineering equation solver
- COP:
-
Coefficient of performance
- VA:
-
Vapour absorption refrigeration system
- VCA:
-
Vapour compression–absorption refrigeration system
- VC:
-
Vapour compression refrigeration system
- Є:
-
Effectiveness of heat exchanger
- η :
-
Efficiency/dimensionless
- A:
-
Absorber
- C:
-
Condenser
- G:
-
Generator
- E:
-
Evaporator
- p:
-
Pump
- c:
-
Compressor
- i, in:
-
Inside
- o, out:
-
Ambient, outside
- Ex:
-
Exergy (kJ s−1)
- η :
-
Efficiency
- c, VA:
-
Compressor in vapour absorption refrigeration system
- c, VCA:
-
Compressor in vapour compression–absorption refrigeration system
- c, VC:
-
Compressor in vapour compression refrigeration system
References
Sanjuan C, Soutullo S, Heras MR. Optimization of a solar cooling system with interior energy storage. Sol Energy. 2010;84:1244–54.
Abdullah MO, Hien TC. Comparative analysis of performance and techno-economics for a H2O–NH3–H2 absorption refrigerator driven by different energy sources. Appl Energy. 2011;87:1535–45.
Anand S, Gupta A, Tyagi SK. Renewable energy powered evacuated tube collector refrigerator system. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2013. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9461-3.
Baik YJ, Park SR, Chang KC, Ra HS. Korean J Air Cond Refrig Eng. 2004;16:1117.
Shah RK, Sekulic DP. Fundamentals of heat exchangers design. New York: Wiley; 2003.
Groll EA, Radermacher R. Vapor compression cycle with solution circuit and desorber/absorber heat exchanger. ASHRAE Trans. 1994;100:73.
Ahlby L, Hedgett D, Berntsson T. Optimization study of compression/absorption cycles. Int J Refrig. 1991;14:16.
Li YW, Wang RZ, Wu JY, Xu YX. Experimental performance analysis on a direct-expansion solar-assisted heat pump water heater. Appl Therm Eng. 2007;27:2858–68.
Berlitz T, Cerkvenik B, Hellmann HM, Ziegler F. A basis for the energetic assessment of the hybrid compression sorption systems. Proceedings of the international sorption heat pump conference (ISHPC), 1999.
Kim B, Park J. Dynamic simulation of a single-effect ammonia water absorption chiller. Int J Refrig. 2007;30:535–45.
Bulgan AT. Use of low temperature energy sources in aqua-ammonia absorption refrigeration systems. Energy Convers Manag. 1997;38:1431–8.
Pilatowsky I, Rivera W, Romero RJ. Thermodynamic analysis of monomethylamine–water solution in a single stage solar absorption refrigeration cycle at low generator temperatures. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2001;70:287–300.
Le Lostec B, Galanis N, Millette J. Experimental study of an ammonia–water absorption chiller. Int J Refrig. 2012;35:2275–86.
Ravikumar TS, Suganthi L, Samuel AA. Exergy analysis of a solar assisted double effect absorption refrigeration system. Renew Energy. 1998;14:55–9.
Adewusi SA, Zubair SM. Second law based thermodynamic analysis of ammonia–water vapor absorption refrigeration system. Energy Convers Manag. 2004;45:2355–69.
Ezzine NB, Barhoumi M, Mejbri K, Chemkhi S, Bellagi A. Solar cooling with the absorption principle: first and second law analysis of an ammonia–water double-generator absorption chiller. Desalination. 2004;168:137–44.
Kim DS, Infante Ferreira CA. Solar refrigeration options—a state-of-the-art review. Int J Refrig. 2008;31:3–15.
Anand S, Gupta A, Tyagi SK. Simulation studies of refrigeration cycles: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;17:260–77.
Mazloumi M, Naghashzadegan M, Javaherdeh K. Simulation of solar lithium–bromide water absorption cooling system with parabolic trough collector. Energy Convers Manag. 2008;49:2820–32.
El Fadar A, Mimet A, Perez Garcia M. Modeling and performance study of a continuous adsorption refrigeration system driven by parabolic trough collector. Sol Energy. 2009;83:850–61.
Vargas JVC, Ordonez JC, Dilay E, Parise JAR. Modeling, simulation and optimization of a solar collector driven water heating and absorption-cooling plant. Sol Energy. 2009;83:1232–44.
Ozgoren M, Bilgili M, Babayigit O. Hourly performance prediction of ammonia–water solar absorption refrigeration system. Appl Therm Eng. 2012;40:80–90.
Dornates R, Estrada CA, Pilatowsky I. Mathematical simulation of a solar-ejector-compression refrigeration system. Appl Therm Eng. 1995;16:669–75.
Arora A, Kaushik SC. Theoretical analysis of a vapor compression refrigeration system with R502, R404A and R507A. Int J Refrig. 2008;31:998–1005.
Qureshi BA, Zubair SM. Performance degradation of a vapor compression refrigeration system under fouled conditions. Int J Refrig. 2011;34:1016–27.
Anand S, Tyagi SK. Exergy analysis and experimental investigation of a vapor compression refrigeration cycle. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;110:961–71.
Zhao L, Cai WJ, Ding X, Chang W. Decentralized optimization for vapor compression refrigeration cycle. Appl Therm Eng. 2013;51:753–63.
Kairouani L, Nehdi E. Cooling performance and energy saving of a compression–absorption refrigeration system assisted by geothermal energy. Appl Therm Eng. 2006;26:288–94.
Ayala R, Heard CL, Holland FA. Ammonia/lithium nitrate absorption/compression refrigeration cycle: part I: simulation. Appl Therm Eng. 1997;17:223–33.
Ayala R, Heard CL, Holland FA. Ammonia/lithium nitrate absorption/compression refrigeration cycle: part II: experimental. Appl Therm Eng. 1998;18:661–70.
Santayo-Gutierrez S, Siqueiros J, Heard CL, Santoyo E, Holland FA. An experimental integrated absorption heat pump effluent purification system: part I: operating on water/lithium bromide solutions. Appl Therm Eng. 1999;19:461–75.
Goktun S. Optimal performance of an irreversible heat engine driven combined vapor compression and absorption refrigerator. Appl Energy. 1999;62:67–79.
Syed MT, Siddiqui MA. Performance and economic study of the combined absorption/compression heat pump. Energy Convers Manag. 1999;40:575–91.
Chinnappa JCV, Crees MR, Srinivasa Murthy G, Srinivasan K. Solar-assisted vapor compression/absorption cascaded air-conditioning systems. Sol Energy. 1993;50:453–8.
Kececiler A, Acar HI, Dogan A. Thermodynamic analysis of the absorption refrigeration system with geothermal energy: an experimental study. Energy Convers Manag. 2000;41:37–48.
Fernandez-Seara J, Sieresd J, Vazquez M. Compression absorption cascade refrigeration system. Appl Therm Eng. 2006;26:502–12.
Satapathy PK, Gopal MR, Arora RC. A comparative study of R22-E181 and R134a-E181 working pairs for a compression–absorption system for simultaneous heating and cooling applications. J Food Eng. 2007;80:939–46.
Pratihar AK, Kaushik SC, Agarwal RS. Simulation of an ammonia–water compression–absorption refrigeration system for water chilling application. Int J Refrig. 2010;33:1386–94.
Garimella Srinivas, Brown AM, Nagavarapu AK. Waste heat driven absorption/vapor-compression cascade refrigeration system for megawatt scale, high-flux, low-temperature cooling. Int J Refrig. 2011;34:1776–85.
Dopazo JA, Fernandez-Seara J. Experimental evaluation of a cascade refrigeration system prototype with CO2 and NH3 for freezing process applications. Int J Refrig. 2011;34:257–67.
Kim J, Park S-R, Baik Y-J, Chang K-C, Ra H-S, Kim M, Kim Y. Experimental study of operating characteristics of compression/absorption high-temperature hybrid heat pump using waste heat. Renew Energy. 2013;54:13.
ASHRAE. Fundamentals handbook. SI ed. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers; 1997.
Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. New York: Wiley; 1995.
Klein SA, Alvarado F. Engineering equation solver, Version 9.083, F-Chart Software, Middleton, WI; 2012.
Acknowledgements
The financial assistance under Project No. 22/541/10-EMR-II from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India for this study is highly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anand, S., Gupta, A. & Tyagi, S.K. Comparative thermodynamic analysis of a hybrid refrigeration system for promotion of cleaner technologies. J Therm Anal Calorim 117, 1453–1468 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-3889-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-3889-x