Skip to main content
Log in

The use of DMTA for predicting standard mechanical properties of developmental polyolefins

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The correlation of linear data from dynamic-mechanical testing (DMTA) to nonlinear data from standard mechanical testing was attempted for a number of quite different polypropylene-based compositions. For limited composition ranges, correlations between storage modulus and stiffness as well as between loss angle integrals and impact strength could be achieved. Challenges in trying to correlate DMTA tests to standard mechanics clearly result from morphology effects at different scales, both in crystallinity and flow-induced superstructures (orientation) and in multiphase impact copolymers or composites. While a relative scaling turned out to be easy, absolute prediction is difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoogenboom R, Meier MAR, Schubert US. Combinatorial methods, automated synthesis and high-throughput screening in polymer research: past and present. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2003;24:15–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tuchbreiter A, Muehlhaupt RA. The polyolefin challenges: catalyst and process design, tailor-made materials, high-throughput development and data mining. Macromol Symp. 2001;173:1–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arriola DJ, Carnahan EM, Hustad PD, Kuhlman RL, Wenzel TT. Catalytic production of olefin block copolymers via chain shuttling polymerization. Science. 2006;312:714–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen M, Wan C, Shou W, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang R. Effects of interfacial adhesion on properties of polypropylene/wollastonite composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2008;107:1718–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fiebig J, Gahleitner M, Paulik C, Wolfschwenger. Ageing of polypropylene: processes and consequences. J Polym Test. 1999;18:257–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gahleitner M, Fiebig J, Wolfschwenger J, Dreiling G, Paulik C. Post-crystallization and physical ageing of polypropylene: material and processing effects. J Macromol Sci Phys. 2002;B41:833–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng Y, Zhang Q, Du R, Fu Q. Crystallization kinetics and tensile modulus of blends of metallocene short-chain branched polyethylene with conventional polyolefins. J Appl Polym Sci. 2005;96:1816–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang R, Li GX, Yang Q. Effects of blending sequence on properties of ternary polyolefin blends. Plast Rubb Comp. 2007;36:314–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grein C, Bernreitner K, Gahleitner M. Potential and limits of dynamic mechanical analysis as a tool for fracture resistance evaluation of isotactic polypropylenes and their polyolefin blends. J Appl Polym Sci. 2004;93:1854–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aarnio M. Structure property relationships of heterophasic ethylene-propylene copolymers. MSc Thesis, Helsinki Universito of Technology, December 2007.

  11. Jancar J, DiAnselmo A, DiBenedetto AT, Kucera J. Failure mechanics in elastomer toughened polypropylene. Polymer. 1993;34:1684–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tranchida D, Piccarolo S, Soliman M. Nanoscale mechanical characterization of polymers by AFM nanoindentations: critical approach to the elastic characterization. Macromolecules. 2006;39:4547–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Labour T, Ferry L, Gauthier C, Hajji P, Vigier G. α- and β-crystalline forms of isotactic polypropylene investigated by nanoindentation. J Appl Polym Sci. 1999;74:195–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reichelt N, Pham T, Gahleitner M. EP 1589070 A1. Polymer composition with improved stiffness and impact strength. Borealis Technology Oy; 2000.

  15. Poelt P, Ingolic E, Gahleitner M, Bernreitner K, Geymayer W. Characterization of modified polypropylene by scanning electron microscopy. J Appl Polym Sci. 2000;78:1152–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grein C, Bernreitner K, Hauer A, Gahleitner M, Neissl W. Impact modified isotatic polypropylene with controlled rubber intrinsic viscosities: some new aspects about morphology and fracture. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;87:1702–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grein C, Gahleitner M, Knogler B, Nestelberger S. Melt viscosity effects in ethylene-propylene copolymers. Rheol Acta. 2007;46:1435–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Molnàr S, Pukànszky B, Hammer CO, Maurer FHJ. Impact fracture study of multicomponent polypropylene composites. Polymer. 2000;41:1529–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thio YS, Argon AS, Cohen RE, Weinberg M. Toughening of isotactic polypropylene with CaCO3 particles. Polymer. 2002;43:3661–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gahleitner M, Grein C, Hauer A. Motha K. Application of dynamic-mechanical analysis for prediction of mechanical performance of polypropylene composites. Procceedings of PPS Europe-Africa conference 2003, Athens, Greece, Lecture 11-A1-O (CD-ROM).

  21. Zia Q, Mileva D, Androsch R. Rigid amorphous fraction in isotactic polypropylene. Macromolecules. 2008;41:8095–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grein C, Gahleitner M. On the influence of nucleation on the toughness of iPP/EPR blends with different rubber molecular architectures. Express Polym Lett. 2008;6:392–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Gahleitner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gahleitner, M., Grein, C., Bernreitner, K. et al. The use of DMTA for predicting standard mechanical properties of developmental polyolefins. J Therm Anal Calorim 98, 623–628 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0506-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0506-5

Keywords

Navigation